(12-07-2012 23:32 )dan g 27 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-07-2012 23:29 )shan_123 Wrote: [ -> ]You would have thought clubs would be keen on that 7 mill release clause on ba's contract but still there is nothing which is strange, I mean the spuds I think have only got 1 recognised striker on their books and here is a bargain being handed to them on a plate.
I guess the comforting thing for Newcastle fans is that clause is only valid until the end of this month lol
I was actually concerned he may leave, but he said he wants to stay
Yh but if a club does come in he will probably consider it strongly and move plus due to the emergence of cisse and the fact he is playing in his position.
The thing with de Jong is he wants a move to that German side but then in a few years time he will want to move again to a bigger club so really it is pointless moving, I would advise him to stay at twente, remember it wasnt too long ago that gladbach were fighting relegation so whose to say they won't slip back down again.
You only have to look at the Leeds team of 1998-2002 who were challenging at the top end but then were relegated
(12-07-2012 23:15 )shan_123 Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta commend QPR aswell they have done sensible and decent business so far in the market and now it looks like hoilett is in their sights aswell.
Now what they should have done is get rid of Barton completely but the chose to go down another route.
Trouble is I hope you realise how much it would have cost us if we did sack hiim. I'm glad he was stripped of the captaincy. I hope that losing that makes him realise it's time he grew up football wise and let his football do the talking for him. If anything, I'd pin my hopes on a mid table finish this coming season and a good cup run would be nice.
jt not guilty of racial abuse.
now the fa restart their investigation like the saurez and evra investigation. saurez got 8game ban if jt is found guitly by the fa he should get the same punishment.
(13-07-2012 10:19 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-07-2012 23:15 )shan_123 Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta commend QPR aswell they have done sensible and decent business so far in the market and now it looks like hoilett is in their sights aswell.
Now what they should have done is get rid of Barton completely but the chose to go down another route.
Trouble is I hope you realise how much it would have cost us if we did sack hiim. I'm glad he was stripped of the captaincy. I hope that losing that makes him realise it's time he grew up football wise and let his football do the talking for him. If anything, I'd pin my hopes on a mid table finish this coming season and a good cup run would be nice.
I mean if u look back to the last game at man city u were leading and then he goes and does that, anyone can wind up Barton and do it to full use, u talk about a decent cup run well with him onboard he could easily end up contibute to knocking you guys out.
Best scenario is when he comes back just bench him and let park do the rest lol.
The muppet even claimed we were interested in getting him but only for it to fall through due to the gervinho incident. Yh like I really would believe that
(13-07-2012 14:29 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]jt not guilty of racial abuse.
now the fa restart their investigation like the saurez and evra investigation. saurez got 8game ban if jt is found guitly by the fa he should get the same punishment.
hmmm intersting what happens with the FA cant really ban him if he has been cleared by the court. Suarez said he actually said the N word Terry denies saying it and was merely repeated it could get him for the language but surely would also have to do ferdinand as well
(13-07-2012 15:05 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ] (13-07-2012 14:29 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]jt not guilty of racial abuse.
now the fa restart their investigation like the saurez and evra investigation. saurez got 8game ban if jt is found guitly by the fa he should get the same punishment.
hmmm intersting what happens with the FA cant really ban him if he has been cleared by the court. Suarez said he actually said the N word Terry denies saying it and was merely repeated it could get him for the language but surely would also have to do ferdinand as well
the fa tribunal is not a law court, he can be banned if he is found guilty even in the eyes of the law he is not guilty. in the saurez case it was the statement of evra since there was no video evidence of what saurez actually said. the evidence was circumstantial it showed suarez turning around saying something to evra but there was no clear picture of what he was saying. in a court of law saurez could have been found not guilty has there is a doubt in the evidence.
(13-07-2012 18:47 )bigguy01 Wrote: [ -> ]the fa tribunal is not a law court, he can be banned if he is found guilty even in the eyes of the law he is not guilty. in the saurez case it was the statement of evra since there was no video evidence of what saurez actually said. the evidence was circumstantial it showed suarez turning around saying something to evra but there was no clear picture of what he was saying. in a court of law saurez could have been found not guilty has there is a doubt in the evidence.
I hope there are grounds for an appeal for Ferdinand.