The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Liverpool FC
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585
Superb stuff from Rodgers at the presser earlier. Proud he's our manager.

"First time I've ever known an independent committee dictated to by so many people."

Well said lad.
(25-04-2013 15:26 )malicious fan Wrote: [ -> ]
(25-04-2013 14:34 )Master Yoda Wrote: [ -> ]The ban he received in Holland, by the laws the fa themselves have in place, should not have been permitted to be considered in this case. However, his previous record in England was allowed to be taken into context as he had been warned about his future conduct. Even still, the 10 match ban is a disgrace when you see some of the incidents that have gone unpunished or dealt with leniantly this season and in previous seasons.

As for fans of other clubs saying he should be booted out of the english game..... pull the other one. There have been players like Roy Keane, Eric Cantona, John Terry, Lee Bowyer and Jonathon Woodgate, Been Thatcher, Wayne Rooney, Patrick Viera, El-Hadji Diouf etc, (the list goes on) who have been involved in incidents as bad or worse than this. Were any of those booted out of English football? No... They took their punishments and returned to play as they were entitled to. Suarez will do likewise - much to the chagrin of the FA, the British media and fans of other football clubs. That is unless Suarez decides he's had enough of the corrupt FA and their agenda and decides he wants to go to another country. What a loss of talent that'd be for the Premier League.

YNWA Luis.

no yoda none of them were booted out of English football and neither has luis suarez and I don't think he will be. I think he will take the ban like you say and come back and if he keeps out of trouble then he has nothing to worry about. he cant go in front of the f.a. if he just keeps concentrates on playing his football. we all know when he comes back hes going to have to put up with players having little digs and winding him up on the pitch as do other players. he is a great player even with my knowledge I know that, and he will prob come back better than ever, but I don't think he will ever do anything daft on a football pitch again after this ban cos he loves to play football. and yes I do think the f.a. are corrupt, stupid and a lot of other things as well when u see this stupid rule come in to play about action after the game cant be taken cos the ref dealt with it there and then wtf!!!

I agree it will be a loss of talent to the Premier League, but I think there has to be a point where Liverpool will have to say 'enough is enough' and I wonder how many fans are getting fed up with reading about Suarez on the back pages.
Also how did the hearing go regarding Hillsboorough? If they have agreed to restart the process into the events of that awful day, then I truly believe finally the full shocking truth will come out and 96 families can at least get the justice they have deserved for so long. And those who served in Thatcher's cabinet should be made to appear in court to listen and also put on record on what they really knew, and be made to make a full public government apology.
(25-04-2013 17:52 )groundnpound Wrote: [ -> ]Superb stuff from Rodgers at the presser earlier. Proud he's our manager.

"First time I've ever known an independent committee dictated to by so many people."

Rodgers was wrong. The comments of the FA were exactly the same as in the case of Eden Hazard earlier this season. In that hearing the independent committee threw the case against Hazard out, showing that contrary to what Rodgers says the independent disciplinary committees are genuinely independent.
The news today is Liverpoool FC say that no appeal will be made against the 10 match ban for Suarez.
Im bored of this story now, the FA have it in for him, appealing would be pointless.
(26-04-2013 12:38 )William H Bonney Wrote: [ -> ]Rodgers was wrong. The comments of the FA were exactly the same as in the case of Eden Hazard earlier this season. In that hearing the independent committee threw the case against Hazard out, showing that contrary to what Rodgers says the independent disciplinary committees are genuinely independent.

Pull the other one.

They were dictated to by David Cameron, FA and Media.

Rodgers was spot on.
Statement from Luis.

[Image: image.jpg]
(26-04-2013 16:18 )groundnpound Wrote: [ -> ]Pull the other one.

They were dictated to by David Cameron, FA and Media.

You must be paying attention to different media to me then. A lot of the media comment I saw regarded the 10 match ban as harsh.
(26-04-2013 16:32 )groundnpound Wrote: [ -> ]Statement from Luis.

[Image: image.jpg]
right, thats where he gets some respect back from some people. i know alot of liverpool fans and other fans dont agree with the 10 game ban or possibly a ban at all but hes got one, and he looks like he wants to just take the punishment and then come back. wether people are pissed off with him for accepting it then thats up to them but respect to him from me for accepting he did wrong!
He should have got a 7 game ban like he did for Ajax.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585
Reference URL's