(18-06-2016 23:40 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]So today the Times declared they were supporting staying in.
Next day the Sunday Times announces it wants out.
Is that what you call hedging your bets?
Are you sure? I can't see anything in the Sunday Times about wanting out.
(19-06-2016 00:06 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ] (18-06-2016 23:40 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]So today the Times declared they were supporting staying in.
Next day the Sunday Times announces it wants out.
Is that what you call hedging your bets?
The Sun has declared for out so that's 2-1 out in the Murdoch camp. Only surprise is it was not 3-0. I expect a new editor to be appointed at The Times imminently 
other way round tonight mail on sunday supports brexit preety obv which side daily mail is on lol
Guessing Financial times is also for staying in
to be honest you only buy a paper if your likely to vote that way so it wont sway people
(19-06-2016 00:32 )elgar1uk Wrote: [ -> ]Are you sure? I can't see anything in the Sunday Times about wanting out.
It's in the editorial apparently. Not the front page or anything like that.
(18-06-2016 20:02 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ] (18-06-2016 18:26 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]Does it say the trade agreement would not involve tariffs?
That's were it gets complex; but you yourself said some will and some wont, plus, your 20% tariff example is an invention of yours, which may or may not be valid.
You're just bullshitting now. Of course 20% is an invention of mine. It was just an attempt to explain to you how tariffs work, ffs
(19-06-2016 00:21 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ] (18-06-2016 20:09 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]You thought wrong.
wackawoo posting false information... who'd have thought it?
Good God, not another one. Will you people STOP being selective, I posted nothng on the lisbon treaty
Are you actually becoming senile?
(18-06-2016 16:04 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Moreover, the Lisbon Treaty stipulates that the EU must make a trade agreement with a country which leaves the EU.
Thought there must be some law or other somewhere.
every treaty has to be made into law by each country thats why there has been votes in house of commons on every treaty change so and act of parlimant goes with it
to be honest its shocking the amount of stuff we dont know about how the Eu works getting the feeling the goverment of the day of each flavour delibrately kept us stupid or they make it so difficult that we just give up and say do whatever you want
doesnt help having to wade neck deep in bull. had sevreel freinds of mine all very educated people saying why did they give us this referendum isnt that what we pay politicians to make these decisions
Gove today says there wont even be a recession if we leave
so we are trust him on the economy when he studied English at Oxford no economics
mind you boris studied fucking Ancient Greek and Ancient roman is something called Literae Humaniores how did these clowns get anywhere near office lol
Still it will all be over on friday one way or another.
one ay or another we'll probably will have to vote again on this as it is possible they will finish level. I can see leave building up a strong led but I think remain might pick up votes late and if it does end up level I'll do the hokey cokey naked!!
(18-06-2016 20:05 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ] (18-06-2016 18:26 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]The myth that ALL EU regulationgine how that could be multiplied across industry in the event of Brexit).
Could the UK it's self introduce OR keep existing bennefitial legislation and regulations?
Why would leavng suddenly mean these will stop?
Because they will be illegal, obviously! They will refer to a sets of agreements which we have just voted to come out of!
Just as when your credit history changes if you become bankrupt!
