(27-06-2016 12:52 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ]So Wackawoo I'll say my final point on this and then we can agree to disagree.
Let me tell you a bit about myself secretAgent, it might explain why people misunderstand what I write, I accept some, if not a lot, is my problem; more than likely it will be met with lies, lies, all is lies
When I was at university (yes i DO have science degree in biology and chemistry,) in the year 1996 I had a dyslexia test. This test was made up of two things, it was the dyslexia test, but also an IQ test, the IQ test was further split in to two, one called verbal reasoning and the other was governing reading and writing and so on. I obviously can't show a pic of the results since this is a personal medical document.
The results, wont suprise you in one part, but it may suprise you in another (I know it did me).
It was found that my overal IQ was 124, this in it's self is in the top 15% of the country
But this is were it gets interesting, as said earlier, the IQ bit was split in two, verbal and the writen bit.
The writian bit was found to be 117, wereas this is quite average, with one thing or another it was found that I had the literacey of around a 14 year old (I was 27 at the time), this you will not be suprise to here
My verbal reasoning however was 131, this is actually in the top 2% of the country
The difference between the two means i am dyslexic (and an extra 15 mins in exams
), I have a few other things but I wont go into them.
What this means in practicle terms is I can understand and see things that a lot of other people miss or don't see BUT I cannot explain or express myself all that well (which is a bastard I can tell you). I also have an habit of not using the the absolute correct words all the time, but words that to me suit very well and 'I know what I mean' type of thing, an example recently has been my use of 'loophole'
I understand how you might be a bit confuzzled about what I mean, I have had to put up with it all my life and is the reason I don't get overly angry about people trying to make me out as stupid or argumentative (unless it's post after post), i know it's me not quite putting across very well what I mean, I apologise to you for the confusion.
In this instance for example a vote as just been won by people wanting out, the libs are wanting a to win with a manifesto on in, I don't think they will get more votes than those who voted out overall even if they did get into power - hence why I called it a vote against democracey.