(24-01-2017 17:56 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]Piers Morgan was Quoting stuff from 2010 as well Roman Polanski has yet to be found guilty of any crime. So its ok for Morgan to call Mcgregor a Pedo lover but not okay to point out the close relationship to someone who has been convicted of a string of sex crimes
Unless you think Max Clifford wasnt guilty you seem not to believe anything when it comes to Sex Crimes Wackawoo 
What I tend to be is objective and none emotive in these things.
First of all my thoughts on Morgan, wasn't this the person that fabricated fake abuse of Iraq prisoners by UK? and thereby put UK troops in even more danger? I find him to be irrisponciblem smarmy, condescending, obnoxous, arrogant and one of these people who says things to try and be controversial; I have zero respect for him and have often wondered how he keeps getting jobs; putting personal feelings aside.
Your link was dated 2002, even if he was speaking about him in 2010 it still means another 3 or 4 years till conviction.
As regarding not believing anything when it comes to sex crimes, I believe 100% in evidence, in cases such as this, that means police reports FROM THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT, and more importantly medical reports from examinations. For crimes has serious as this, 'he did this in 1977' isn't enough, EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE.
Now I know full well that some crimes can go unreported, I know somebody who was very severely attack, being kept over night beaten and repeatedly raped. She went to the police to report the assualt and take the perosn to court, and the two FEMALE officers were complete cunts with her and basically bullied her out of going through with the charges, which she would have done. Some time after the attack it drove next to her wound down the window and asked if she wanted a lift, obviously she said no, he said 'you're learning' and drove off.
So yes I am fully aware that these crimes happen and the guilty go unpunished. But I am also aware that the innocent are also convicted or accused.
I have NEVER ONCE claimed anybody was innocent, I don't think JS (note i never spell his name out) is guilty of every little last thing that is claimed for him (there could not possibly be evidence for some of the more fanciful storys) but I never once claimed he or his ilk were innocent either, but merely asked what was the EXACT evidence, ie medical reposts, police reports from the time of the incidence etc. What compensation a victem receives being an indication of evidence they have.
