The UK Babe Channels Forum

(23-02-2017 00:00 )gooner bob Wrote: [ -> ]approval ratings dipped again after the rally was held.

(23-02-2017 00:00 )gooner bob Wrote: [ -> ]

(19-02-2017 01:57 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]So the people just paid $3 million to hear this clown repeat some election promises.

They should insist he stays in Washington and gets on with the job.

Trump getting on with the job is what some people fear the most though.

Holding rallies is better, as it doesn't do any harm to anyone, except possibly Trump himself whose approval ratings dipped again after the rally was held.

The President is not supposed to waste tax payers money

Ye gads that anybody should be seen to be offending the LGBT community, but this is absolutely right.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/tru...li=BBoPWjQ

Can't these people see how this could be miss used?

It even says:

Quote:The decision would be a reversal of an Obama-era directive issued in May. It required public schools to grant toilet access even if student records differ or others are uncomfortable.

So under Obama, if a bloke claiming to be transgender, but is still physically a man with all the acutriments, they could walk right into a female toilet and not give too hoots if any female in there is uncomfortable with it, I assume they have no rights.

Yet this article is presented as Trump predjudice

Quote:The reversal would be a major setback for transgender rights, which had been urging Mr Trump to keep the safeguards in place.

(23-02-2017 05:13 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]... a bloke claiming to be transgender, but is still physically a man with all the acutriments ...

I suggest you look up the definition of transgender.

Mexico will not accept Trumps immigration plans : -
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/f...-videgaray

Looks likely that wall isn't going to last long if anything nasty happens

(23-02-2017 06:36 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ]

(23-02-2017 05:13 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]... a bloke claiming to be transgender, but is still physically a man with all the acutriments ...

I suggest you look up the definition of transgender.

Why would i need to, what is my degree in?

My sister had her first girlfriends in the early 80's, long before LGBT became to upmost in trend, this has only happened in the past ten years or so; I'm very well aware of the LGBT. Back then, by far the majority of people in the country were incredibly hostile to LGBT community.

But knowing the deffinition of what a transgender is, it isn't, suprise suprise, what my post was about.

It was about the a law change that is clearly being used as ammunition agaisnt Trump in the 'fair media' over an issue that is an grey area that COULD be abuse of it BY HETEROSEXUAL men.

That article clearly states it applies to men pre op, not women post op. It also clearly states that women using those toilets who are umcomfortable with pre op people using the same toilet as them is a complete irrelavance, that in it self is totally wrong.

IF they (the transgenders) suddenly had a great big massive complex about going in to mail toilets, or if they are living life fully as a woman and dressed as a woman (and there a lot of heterosexual transvestites out there) then they can use the alternative of the disabled toilets which are normally unisex and normally very little used so they would have all the privacey in the world.

This is nothing to do with being transgender, there are clear alternatives, this is more to to with pcism gone crazy and ism people demanding everything they wont; but in this case it could be open to misuse.

There really can't be that many transgenders in the world in any one place at any one time to warrent such laws; how many TRUE transgenders do you think is going ot be in any given school, colledge or university at any given time?

Whatevers going on in the mind/soul/spirit of a TG, pre op they are biologically males, have Y chromosome, cock and balls, and I'd have thought biological woman feeling uncomfortable with that should be taken into account.

Mod Edit: You have been told not to bring the mods into your arguement so I've removed the dig - Charle

First of all LGBT is not a trend

You and your twisted logic, nightmare, you said ''a bloke claiming to be transgender'', when at its core this is about children (school age teens) who live as/identify as trans, big difference to what you're implying. This is about both sexes identifying as the other, not male creeps trying to con people so they can perve on girls in showers and bogs, these people should be treated with respect and need protected from the kind of people who try to force them into being the gender they were born, rather than the one they feel/identify as.

Brock the captain of the football team came out as trans, he wasn't really, but said it so he could shower with the girls, whether they liked it or not. This is what the media (certain media) are trying to push as a reason against it, when in fact the only issue is the facilities. If a school has a trans student, they will know if it's legit or not, it is obvious and easily fact checked with family and a doctor. Toilets have stalls with doors, shower times can be arranged, it's not difficult. Using the disabled toilet is disrespectful as being transgender isn't a disability and it's not a life style choice, it's who they are.

It's not men in drag!

If you don't want your views challenged, stop posting here, or at least proof read your posts and think about how others will react.
Oh and I and the other moderators will thank any post we want, as we are allowed to have an opinion. We are members as well as mods.

In the the election campaign Trump was explicitly asked if Caitlyn Jenner (Bruce Jenner) would be allowed to use any toilet in Trump Tower. He said yes. He also repeatedly said he backed LGBT rights. Of course that was when he wanted their votes.

The man is a liar.

Politicians flip flop depending on what will get the votes.

he doesnt give a shit either way bet this is a way to keep the bible bashers happy so they support on stuff he cares about such as budget and other financial stuff

remember one of th southern states tried to do something similar and gave in because a lot of the big companies from the state were saying they would pull out of the state