The UK Babe Channels Forum

(21-02-2017 10:20 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]They all use autocue it's no big deal except for Wackawooo who likes to think his guy is more intelligent than anyone else. A bit like himself

At least I'm dumb enough to argue with people I don't disagree with.

To put it in perspective, the way you have been for weeks would be like me abusing silent majority over the autocues at the inaugartion for weeks. That's the level of stupidity we are dealing with when it comes to you, and others on here.

Donald Trump is worth Billions, has been very sucessful in business, we only hear the failings here; bizarrly nominated twices for emmy's and has become the president of the united states of america.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump#Careers

'The Washington Post concluded that "Trump is a mix of braggadocio, business failures, and real success."'

Good and bad, the bloke has lead quite an extrodinary life, something you people are too predjudice to acknowledge. He's achieved more, done more, employed more people than you or I will ever do in a life time. He has this odd negative side, I've certianly not argued with that, just the oopiste, but all those finger waging out rage at him will have too. The same reporters that are crying out rage at his stance on immigration will be the same reports a couple of years ago that was reporting what a problem these immigants are.

So yes, the pair of us are much more intelligent than you.

But enjoy your autocue, even though it still doesn't alter a damn I stated, it just reduces my example by one, becasue he didn't use them at Scotland.

(21-02-2017 13:02 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]interesting peice on sky news about california that they are even contemplating wether to have an idependence vote next year

Unlike scotland California could live without the union lol in fact prob be as rich as the UK. America would Lose Hollywood and Silicon Valley

That wont happen, poeple are getting carried away with this independance thing. UK is a very different animal and never really sat comfortably in the EU as only part of a greater state, domineered with a German/ Franch alliance.

(21-02-2017 04:42 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]But, there deffinatley were none at scotland when he was at his most impressive, and where I first heard of him.

The first time you ever heard of Donald Trump was last June?

(21-02-2017 13:30 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]The first time you ever heard of Donald Trump was last June?

Pretty much, I'd vaugley heard the name but that was more to do with the apprentice, I knew the apprentice was based on a US show which had a Trump in the role of Sugar, even then it was more of a passing thing and the inner Beavis and Butthead at the name Trump; i had no wish nor want to look him up and read his CV.

It means of course I didn't come to him with any baggage or perceived ideas. I hear the negative things people say about him (who am I to argue with those? and I have not), but I've read the positive also.

I'm, not an American, nor wish nor want to go there so i have zero interest in the people who live there, unless it happens to be a TV program or film I am watching, even then I'm not interested who the actors are. This Trump thing though, like Brexit, is pretty world important.

The initial recation to him when I watched that Scotish press conference was how together he was. He was at the PM/Trump conference as well, then he doesn't take the simplest of precutions in getting his facts absolutely right, has this rage at the media, a lot justified, but a lot brought on by himself. Gets into silly twitter spats, seems incapable to take critism and digs his heels in.

He seems a odd mix of intelligent and reasoning with meglomania and narcissism

I'm the type of fella not to judge and give people a fair chance. At the moment he's pushing it, but he still has a chance to pull it around, after all, we know about the headline grabbing policies and press rants, but we don't know what else he is doing.

My biggest concern is if there is a switch in his mind between the reasoning and megalomanic, then we are in the realms of Hussein and PolPot.

But I do think a lot of the outrage at some of his policies to are more to do with using them to beat him with a stick than any genuine outrage about the policies or people themselves (before the kid drowned that time, they were finantial migrants in the press). We hear about the sexism, but lets face it, this site and all the babestation chanels are sexist and objectifying women, (twist it all you like into independant women), that is what this site is mainly for and most of the poeple on this site watch the channels to see mainly very young women get their tits out; so like say who am I to judge.

Don't judge least you be judge.

^Poor Wackawoo your stupidity grows with each passing moment. Getting uptight about crowd size and if people use autocue. You shout a lot but nothing intelligent comes of it.

Earliest time I can remember hearing the name Donald Trump was when he was mentioned in Die Hard With A Vengeance. Saw it again recently, and pretty much the only other celebrity to be mentioned in the script is Hilary Clinton.

With the plot sideline on US presidents, maybe the writer had some sort of minor flash of premonition, lol.

(21-02-2017 17:28 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]Poor Wackawoo your stupidity grows with each passing moment. Getting uptight about crowd size and if people use autocue. You shout a lot but nothing intelligent comes of it.

The time stamp of my post was 16:25, your post was posted at 16:28, you had to click 'view new post', the page load, then read my post which was relatively lengthy, then compost your reply.

All in less than 3 minutes.

It's pretty obvious you didn't read my post other than the member name. It probably explains why your post it has nothing to do with what I have just posted. It also explains your perculiar stance.

That's twice you've fucked up big time. You really should stop trying to pick a none existant splinter from peoples eyes and ignoring the, I would say plank, but forrest is more hap.

I'm not uptight about autocues and what exactly are these crowds i am uptight about?

He was replying to a post you make at 12 :12 today
Who didn't read what now

(21-02-2017 17:45 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]The time stamp of my post was 16:25, your post was posted at 16:28, you had to click 'view new post', the page load, then read my post which was relatively lengthy, then compost your reply.

All in less than 3 minutes.

It's pretty obvious you didn't read my post other than the member name. It probably explains why your post it has nothing to do with what I have just posted. It also explains your perculiar stance.

That's twice you've fucked up big time. You really should stop trying to pick a none existant splinter from peoples eyes and ignoring the, I would say plank, but forrest is more hap.

I'm not uptight about autocues and what exactly are these crowds i am uptight about?

Perhaps it would be best if you left this discussion you just come across as stupid.

(21-02-2017 17:51 )Sm© Wrote: [ -> ]He was replying to a post you make at 12 :12 today
Who didn't read what now

Ah, look, Mr perfects batman and apologist.

Why would I read my own post all over again?

Is there any reason I would assume his post wasn't to the one i had just posted?

We will just have to put it down to a coincidence that perfects post arrived after i posted.

Since you are his spokes person, can you explain the 'crowd size' comments and why he's been attacking my post for weeks when I have not disagreed with a single thing anybody has stated about Trump?

Your name looks very familier, didn't it use to be green, did you us to be a mod?