The UK Babe Channels Forum

Trump continues with his hostility to the media.

(18-02-2017 02:00 )Glenn Miller Wrote: [ -> ]Trump continues with his hostility to the media.

He will make history as the shortest serving president. HR is in constant conflict with the constitution that he took an oath to serve and protect.

(18-02-2017 00:44 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]

(17-02-2017 22:47 )Matt77 Wrote: [ -> ]Nailed it Mr Perfect.

You do realise you are coming across as a bit of a stalker now right?

Bit creepy dude, bit creepy.

Well Wack you stalk profiles your not in a good position to point fingers.

(18-02-2017 02:22 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]He will make history as the shortest serving president. HR is in constant conflict with the constitution that he took an oath to serve and protect.

Trump needs to get a move on then. William Henry Harrison died of pneumonia 31 days into his term.

(18-02-2017 02:23 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]Well Wack you stalk profiles your not in a good position to point fingers.

By responding to you? I've been on both threads not long after the start of them. Only becoming aware of you two when you both constantly started commenting on my posts; this is not stalking.

Do you watch Fox news?

What bit about not disagreeing with anything anybody has said about Trump don't you understand?

You don't seem to have answered these two very simple questions yet.

(18-02-2017 02:24 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: [ -> ]

(18-02-2017 02:22 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]He will make history as the shortest serving president. HR is in constant conflict with the constitution that he took an oath to serve and protect.

Trump needs to get a move on then. William Henry Harrison died of pneumonia 31 days into his term.

thanks for the clarification Tumble Drier so Trump will take the number two spot.

(18-02-2017 02:40 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]

(18-02-2017 02:23 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]Well Wack you stalk profiles your not in a good position to point fingers.

By responding to you? I've been on both threads not long after the start of them. Only becoming aware of you two when you both constantly started commenting on my posts; this is not stalking.

Do you watch Fox news?

What bit about not disagreeing with anything anybody has said about Trump don't you understand?

You don't seem to have answered these two very simple questions yet.

You viewed my rep history comments to try to make a point. As usual you failed. As regard your boring unintelligent questions. If you say your not disagreeing that's your story and no doubt you will stick to it like Trump sticks to his alternative facts and disrespectful attitude to the constitution and the media.

I think anyone who takes an interest in current affairs will look at Fox News from time to time when you need a laugh.

It's not a serious channel

(18-02-2017 02:45 )MR PERFECT Wrote: [ -> ]You viewed my rep history comments to try to make a point. As usual you failed. As regard your boring unintelligent questions. If you say your not disagreeing that's your story and no doubt you will stick to it like Trump sticks to his alternative facts and disrespectful attitude to the constitution and the media.

This also not stalking, it is what rep comments are for. Naturally if some one takes it upon themselves to constantly attack me personally I will have vaguely more of an interest. Sorry to dissapoint you, but your nothing special in my reading reps other than that. The comment was just an happy coincident. I have read that matt77 as well and that does make interesting and believable reading.

To matters

A casual look back over my posting history will confirm I have never disagreed with what anybody has ever stated about Trump. on the contrary. I know your prone to invention but the evidence is there in black and Grey.

Let me put it to you, the reason you are not answering those two questions, is because you know you have checked mated yourself, however you try and wiggle out of it with your inventions and lies, and have finally realised your error when I 'called you out'

You critize people for watching Fox news yet you very clearly watch it yourself.

You have been attacking my posts, attacking me, having to resort to lies and outrageous inventions, with absolutely nothing to back up your claims, for many many pages of post now. All of these attacks and silly inventions have been based on an astronomical mistake on your part - thinking I'm a Trump supporter.

This has always been due your extremist, irrational attitude over Trump. You think if people don't look at it exactly has you do then clearly you must be some form of Trump supporter. Confusing for your tiny mind is my saying things like, he's an odd chap who sounds perfectly reasonable (or did) in interviews, cannot do what he wants, cannot judge a presidential term on a few weeks, pointing to facts about the wall and imigrants, you seem to think these are all in support of him and blinded you to WHAT I WAS ACTUALLY SAYING (to be fair you are far from alone in that).

Never once did I disagree with what anybody said about him and more over, actually agreed, example, I stated, 'he's and odd fellow, seems reasonable in in interviews' the bit your prejudice mind sees, but 'yet he has this EXTREMIST side' which is the bit that doesn't register with you; you are not alone in this either, but you such had a cock sure attitude about you and claims of 'intelligent and thought out', that I couldn't resist a play, like the moggy does with the squeaker.

I knew right from the start what you was, I knew right from the start that you only read what you wanted to read, I also knew from the start that one day you would trip up, and tip up you did, smack on your face. I knew it was just a matter of time.

It is the reason you could not answer my question, because you realsied you was wrong, and every single post, comment, wired invention and insults you have thrown away are all based on you thinking I was a Trump supporter.

this is not and has not ever been the case.

It means every single post you have made to me is completely wrong and completely worthless, much the same as you and your opnions are completely worthless.

At least you are with others of like mind and prejudiced minds. I have toyed with you long enough. You are dismissed, I have nothing more to say to you.

(17-02-2017 19:01 )skully Wrote: [ -> ]

(17-02-2017 18:45 )HannahsPet Wrote: [ -> ]Christ i hope this 100,000 national guard mobilisation to remove illegals is a load of bull can see a civil war in states like california where hispanic neoghbourhoods are prob better armed than our army

Yeah, that is a worrying idea, but I get the feeling they'll go for easy targets rather than criminal gangs.

I guess some could be used to send Mexican illegals back 'over the Wall!'

guessing will be a lot of Soldiers of Hispanic descent anyway