The UK Babe Channels Forum

Just how much power do they want to give Ofcom. Independent my arse!

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/ap...-regulator

I wouldn't for one even trust Boris!! Let alone bloody vote for him the hairy numpty!! at the present time I am not voting because the parties have shafted us all in one way or another over OFCOM (I actually believe it is OFCOM's words coming out of Cameron's mouth sometimes! and it is OFCOM who are actually running our Government & Westminster) but until one party says it will abolish OFCOM then I for one will waste my vote on an independent candidate on May 8

Ofcom considers deregulation of TV and telecoms sectors

From the FT home of good journalism

Quote:Ofcom is eyeing deregulation of the television and telecoms industry to reflect radical shifts in how people watch, read and talk over the past decade.

In her first interview since taking over as head of the UK media regulator, Sharon White said Ofcom needed to examine how competition from US internet groups such as YouTube and Facebook was changing the British media and telecoms markets.

“One of the big issues in my in-tray is going to be the internet” she said. “[The regulatory response] is something we are going to have to look closely at.

“We will certainly look at whether there is scope for a lighter approach given the entry of newer players and technology that we wouldn’t have dreamt of a few years ago.”

Ms White, a former Treasury official who oversaw Whitehall spending cuts, has joined Ofcom as it faces meaty challenges given the shift to digital platforms.

The regulator has begun its first review of the communications market for a decade, to take into account the growing power of internet services.

Ofcom will look at whether market definitions, and regulations, need to be redrawn in the TV and telecoms sectors given BT’s aggressive push into sports broadcasting and Sky’s strong position in broadband. BT’s ownership of Openreach, the national fixed line network, will also be reviewed, Ms White confirmed.

“Convergence has started to happen in a very rapid timeframe, be it fixed and mobile [telecoms] or the blurring [of] the distinctions between the traditional telco and traditional media company,” the Ofcom chief executive said.

“[We will] see if there are ways to promote competition. Are there areas we can deregulate? But with the consumer at the centre of it all.”

Ms White said Ofcom could also consider the pay-TV market, which had also changed dramatically over the past decade with the arrival of video streaming services such as Netflix.

The question of whether the pay-TV world needs a fundamental rethink is an issue I will come to, probably after the [Premier League] investigation,” she said, referring to work by the regulator’s response to Virgin Media’s request to investigate the spiralling cost of football rights.

Ofcom said after the interview: “If pay-TV issues come up as part of our digital communications review then we will consider them but we are not planning a fundamental review of pay-TV”.

Ms White’s job is one of Britain’s most high-profile regulatory roles and takes in the looming battle over BBC licence fee renewal, transformational mergers in mobile telecoms, and other consumer flashpoints such as rural broadband, contract switching and nuisance calls.

And, of course, there are more salacious matters such as complaints about the BBC’s sacking of Jeremy Clarkson or bias in general election coverage. The first two TV election debates had attracted over 500 complaints, she said, mostly about impartiality.

“[Communications and media] is the second biggest sector of economy,” she said. “It’s about how regulation supports the sector. It is 10 years since the last review. The last time we looked at telecoms only. This time it’s the broad market.”

One area that Ofcom is not seeking extra powers over is the BBC, Ms White said, responding to chancellor George Osborne’s suggestion this week that the regulator could assume the work of the BBC Trust.

Ms White, who worked with the chancellor during her time at the Treasury, said: “We will look at it closely and make our best fist of it” if a new Conservative government followed up Mr Osborne’s idea.

Mr White will not herself be drawn into the political debate. The respected economist and career civil servant has never declared a political allegiance having worked under Tony Blair at Downing Street but then in Treasury with the Conservative-led government. At Ofcom she will be renewing relations with culture secretary Sajid Javid, her former Treasury boss.

The regulator’s new head is prepared for a high level of political, and public, scrutiny and knows she will be pilloried for any mistakes.

Ms White said she relishes the chance to move from key back office roles at Treasury to the spotlight as regulator of an industry that loves to write about itself.

As the first female head of the media regulator — and the wife of Robert Chote, head of the Office for Budget Responsibility — Ms White is aware of the attention she could attract.

But the regulator said she aims to enjoy her new role as much as possible. “It was one of the attractions of moving out of Whitehall. It’s important we get the public scrutiny and there is personal accountability that I feel strongly about. You can’t take the criticism too personally and you have to have a sense of humour.”

Press could face threat of statutory regulation by Ofcom under Labour government

Quote:Labour’s pledge to enforce the Leveson report recommendations could ultimately see the UK press threatened with regulation by Ofcom.

The party said in its manifesto launch yesterday: “We expect the industry to establish a mechanism for independent self-regulation, which delivers proper redress for individuals, as set out in the Royal Charter, and agreed by all parties in Parliament.

“We made a promise to victims of the phone hacking scandal. We stand by that promise and will keep it.”

The Leveson report was published in November 2012, but so far no newspaper has signed up with a Leveson-compliant regulator.

Most national newspapers have signed up to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (its chair, Sir Alan Moses, has said it is not compliant with Leveson).

IPSO falls down on Leveson's recommendations chiefly because it is not fully independent of the journalism industry.

More at PressGazette

George Osborne backs Ofcom to take over from BBC Trust as regulator

Quote:The chancellor signals that he favours handing BBC oversight to independent watchdog as well as reforming corporation further after election

George Osborne has signalled that he favours the handover of BBC regulation from the BBC Trust to independent watchdog Ofcom.

The chancellor also indicated he may seek changes during the renegotiation of the BBC’s royal charter which will follow the 7 May general election, to prevent the corporation stifling other local news providers with the volume of its output.

The BBC Trust was established in 2007, taking on the responsibilities formerly exercised by the board of governors for setting a strategic direction for the BBC and exercising oversight of its work in the interests of licence-fee payers.

But the trust’s chair, Rona Fairhead, said last month that it should be abolished and replaced by a new external regulator and a stronger board.

Speaking to the Radio Times, Osborne said: “The trust arrangement has never really worked. I’ve never understood why the BBC is so frightened of regulation by Ofcom.

“It’s not as if ITV is poorly regulated. Ofcom has proved itself to be a robust regulator.”

More at Guardian

Bloody hell if OFCOM get gold of the BBC there is no chance for Top Gear ever returning, they'll turn Eastenders into a shadow of what it is already, probably ban football and rugby programmes as they would be deemed too violent!! There is only one person to blame for this....

Mary bloody Whitehouse!!! I bet if she was still with us the old bint she'd bloody happy seeing all this regulation!!

(15-04-2015 18:16 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]Just how much power do they want to give Ofcom. Independent my arse!

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/ap...-regulator

Apologies to Shandyhand who posted the BBC-George Osborne story earlier.

^ Ofcom changes to how 09 numbers (amongst others) are charged from this summer:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/ne...e-ins.html

Presumably, this is another reason why BS are, apparently, dropping their cheap 9-10pm intro rate for nights.

Interesting News article aired prior to the General Election as Murdoch calls ofcom to be scrapped saying they are biased towards his news group.



http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/list...17164.html

^
just from watching that i get the impression that ca(moron) is in murdocks pocket.
the bbc is pretty much his only real competition world wide as far as news broadcasting goes so if he starts his bias and the bbc rebukes it you can see why he's getting pissed and paying politicians to try and get rid of it.

i aint a fan of the bbc by any means but it is independent and needs to stay that way.