(11-05-2012 02:51 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Strangely Ofcom are clearly OK about full on sex in its many forms and ejaculation on encrypted channels, provided penetration is not show, or genital contact, or semen leaving a penis (landing on a womans face is OK though)
Seeing their fucked up logic written down like that just highlights even more how ridiculous it all is. Spunk seen shooting from the penis is harmful and/or unacceptable... seeing that same spunk landing on a woman's face is fine, though
Bizarre.
(11-05-2012 13:25 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ] (11-05-2012 02:51 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Strangely Ofcom are clearly OK about full on sex in its many forms and ejaculation on encrypted channels, provided penetration is not show, or genital contact, or semen leaving a penis (landing on a womans face is OK though)
Seeing their fucked up logic written down like that just highlights even more how ridiculous it all is. Spunk seen shooting from the penis is harmful and/or unacceptable... seeing that same spunk landing on a woman's face is fine, though
Bizarre.
They don't mind tiny cameras inside the vagina to watch ejaculation on channel 176 though
We all no Ofcom have been in power since 2003 courtesy of F**kin labour, which means they've been in power for 9yrs. My question is does anyone no how many yrs ofcom have left being in power?
We no that the ITC lost out to labour, hence Ofcom was founded, but I was curios to no if Ofcom have a time limit in power?
(11-05-2012 18:29 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]We all no Ofcom have been in power since 2003 courtesy of F**kin labour, which means they've been in power for 9yrs. My question is does anyone no how many yrs ofcom have left being in power?
We no that the ITC lost out to labour, hence Ofcom was founded, but I was curios to no if Ofcom have a time limit in power?
Why blame Labour? They are not in power now.
The Tories are just as bad.
(11-05-2012 19:28 )blackjaques Wrote: [ -> ] (11-05-2012 18:29 )continental19 Wrote: [ -> ]We all no Ofcom have been in power since 2003 courtesy of F**kin labour, which means they've been in power for 9yrs. My question is does anyone no how many yrs ofcom have left being in power?
We no that the ITC lost out to labour, hence Ofcom was founded, but I was curios to no if Ofcom have a time limit in power?
Why blame Labour? They are not in power now.
The Tories are just as bad.
Point taken you're right, and this coalition has done F**K all
apparantly you can't call someone a blonde bombshell in a text on these shows , as it was edited as blonde ****shell
you can't call them blonde anymore either, due to the negative connotations associated with the word (airheads etc). you have to call them 'funky beige'!
Give it a few years and it will be academic as the various fundamentalists (Christian, Islamic, Bhuddist) will have them all covering their hair. Oh the other hand it will be good for wimple fans.
(12-05-2012 02:49 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Give it a few years and it will be academic as the various fundamentalists (Christian, Islamic, Bhuddist) will have them all covering their hair. Oh the other hand it will be good for wimple fans.
Does religion have to be dragged into this? At the end of the day people are complaining over a minor matter and that is how girls are being treated on a tv screen not girls that u see see physically everyday but girls on tv, if you took this to court the judge will probably laugh at the case or be in disbelief that it managed to make it to the court in the first place.
I ain't gonna lie I like sometimes watching the shows but can't really stand it now overall but the truth of the matter is ofcom has been around since what like 2003 or 04 so it's not like a monster has suddenly now started causing problems for the channels, they have been regulating for years.
Like I said before there never gona go away and if u take them on u will lose, just get over it and accept its never gona change.
The girls are doing it in order for them to get exposure and of course earn decent enough money, I highly doubt they will side with u guys if it ever made it to the courts. They will look out for number 1 and that is themselves, think about it they have the easiest jobs in the world in waving their phones around and taking calls, u really think they will sacrifice that for rebelling against ofcom?
(12-05-2012 08:42 )shan_123 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2012 02:49 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Give it a few years and it will be academic as the various fundamentalists (Christian, Islamic, Bhuddist) will have them all covering their hair. Oh the other hand it will be good for wimple fans.
Does religion have to be dragged into this? At the end of the day people are complaining over a minor matter and that is how girls are being treated on a tv screen not girls that u see see physically everyday but girls on tv, if you took this to court the judge will probably laugh at the case or be in disbelief that it managed to make it to the court in the first place.
I ain't gonna lie I like sometimes watching the shows but can't really stand it now overall but the truth of the matter is ofcom has been around since what like 2003 or 04 so it's not like a monster has suddenly now started causing problems for the channels, they have been regulating for years.
Like I said before there never gona go away and if u take them on u will lose, just get over it and accept its never gona change.
The girls are doing it in order for them to get exposure and of course earn decent enough money, I highly doubt they will side with u guys if it ever made it to the courts. They will look out for number 1 and that is themselves, think about it they have the easiest jobs in the world in waving their phones around and taking calls, u really think they will sacrifice that for rebelling against ofcom?
I think eccles was only being sarcastic when he mentioned the religion stuff , he just gave a example of how censorship in this country could go and the comment was made tongue in cheek and wasn't meant to be taken so seriously .
Yes Ofcom have been around for years , i think someone said 2002/2003 ? , but they never used to endorse the same strict rules as they do today , over time they have brought in new more restrictive rules , when i first had Sky installed in late 2006 the babe channels had much more freedom than today , full frontal nudity was allowed , the sexstation girls up to mid 2007 used to do full frontal strip teases's with every thing on show (not legs wide open) , close up pussy rubbing was allowed (knickers on) on all the channels as well , then Ofcom decided that what they themselves had been allowing for years they would not allow any longer for some reason , so they brought out new rules preventing full frontal nudity pussy rubbing etc .
Then in September 2010 they decided to recategorise the babe channels as Teleshopping services and brought out more restrictive rules , the girls couldn't go topless until after 10pm , quite a few channels used to let the girls go topless at 9.30pm at this time , they also brought out new rules preventing the girls from going naked until after 11pm , some used to go naked after 10pm . Bikini's were also banned on the day shows as well .
So Ofcom are gradually bringing more restrictive rules out as time goes by . What Ofcom had been allowing the girls to do for years they decided in their wisdom that they wouldn't allow it any longer . What they themselves originally thought was OK to be shown and would not cause harm/offence they decided after regulating the channels for years that this material breached generally excepted rules , so banned it .
As for the "just get over it and except it's never gonna to change" comment , well all i can say is thank god there are brave people in this world that don't just except that things can't change , especially when concerning fighting against tierney and dictatorial control freak organisations and governments , sadly i'm not one of them , but some people lay down their life to fight against injustice and censorship .