(24-02-2013 03:34 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ] (24-02-2013 02:23 )RCTV Wrote: [ -> ]great how you guys seem to be jumping on someone who hasn't put any actual evidence down. WELL DONE VERY CLEVER OF YOU!!!!!
Dave you such a BIG MAN pming people with claims about me, why don't you pm them to me, I don't use my real name on that facebook 
You can have dyslexia and get a PhD. a PhD doesn't equal amazing English and Grammar, it means you have a specialist knowledge in a subject area.
Give it up and get help.
awww don't like someone fighting back. poor you, makes me so sad.
You seem to totally ignore that post, as it actually gives reasons that you don't like as it can totally disprove what you said.
This Ofcom thread is going off track, mainly due to the wild and seemingly fraudulent claims by RCTV to have worked for Ofcom and the Babe channels, RCTV has said he/she worked for BS and Bangbabes, RCTV has said he/she was a producer of these shows, RCTV has claimed that he/she worked for Ofcom between 2004 and 2008 (i think), RCTV has even said that he/she managed to get slight changes to the rules, then there is the claims made about running a babe channel in Spain etc and being prevented from broadcasting in the UK by Ofcom . RCTV has been using this so called insider knowledge that he/she claims to have when in debates concerning the channel and Ofcom etc to give weight to what he she is saying, these seemingly fraudulent claims have led people to think that RCTV is actually a Ofcom member come onto this forum to give info concerning how Ofcom actually does things, RCTV has been given a rep for being a Ofcom member prepared to come on here and explain things,.
People are actually believing RCTV's claims to have worked for Ofcom are true and that he/she knows more about how the babe channels and Ofcom are run than the rest of us .
What i will say to RCTV is put up or shut up concerning you're Ofcom and babe channel CV. Seemingly fraudulent claims to have worked for Ofcom and the Babe channels has led to this Ofcom thread going off track and no serious Ofcom debates taking place due to you're claims, you you're self will not be taken seriously until you prove these claims are true, these claims can easily be verified to admin in private, you claim that some of the babe channel girls know you from you're time working on the babe channels, many girls, producers, babe channel staff still work on the channels today that did when you say you worked on the channel, some are members of this forum so should be able to verify who you claim to be, Cellcast will also be able to verify that you were a employee of theirs, admin is in contact with Cellcast and the other channels, so could verify this for you, Jamie from Studio 66 was the main producer of Bangbabes before he joined Studio 66, so presumably he could verify that you worked for Bangbabes . IMO if you want anyone to take seriously anything you say concerning you're knowledge of Ofcom and the babe channels then you need to prove that you're claims aren't fraudulent .
I don't think you're going to get a response
No response has been provided by RCTV since Mr Mystery's post was written over 24 hours ago. All I have seen is the Ofcom discussion being well and truly derailed and shifted down a blind alley of claims which I would consider to be questionable at best.
Of course the claims made by RCTV could be genuine, but my instincts tell me they are not, just too many indescrepencies for me to take what he/she says seriously, and I'd hazard a guess that the same feeling is shared by many on here.
Floor is yours RCTV....prove us wrong.....in your own time........
i agree, need proof that RCTV worked for ofcom. Its too good to be true for my liking, i mean its like me saying I was a producer at bangbabes.
Regardless of whether or not RCTV once worked for Ofcom, the interrogation of her/him was starting get unpleasantly pack-like. Three or four forum members at a time, circling round insisting on explanations isn't particularly good form.
(26-02-2013 00:25 )Addison Wrote: [ -> ]Regardless of whether or not RCTV once worked for Ofcom, the interrogation of her/him was starting get unpleasantly pack-like. Three or four forum members at a time, circling round insisting on explanations isn't particularly good form.
I was thinking that, also find it quite ironic that there is a group of people who claim that someone doesn't work for ofcom when they have no knowledge of ofcom's internal workings. For all we know RCTV could be telling the truth, just he/she (assuming she by her signature) but rather than using official documents, she's using her own memory, far shot, but could be true.
