(05-07-2012 09:33 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ]i would like to know how one man can be responsible for all the decisions at ofcom , surely a panel would decide the fate of a channel in breach of their so called rules ?
Hopefully a panel consisting of straight and single men
, otherwise we and the babe channels will continue to get screwed. I can imagine many straight men in relationships, being pro censorship due to their girlfriends/wives giving them a guilt trip, and we've seen so much penis on the TV to make me wonder if many of the employees are gay, or women who are hypocrites.
Did anyone see her flash her lovely pussy early hours this morning? it was amazing, best slip i've ever seen and i've been watching for years!
Can I then propose that a new ofcom panel is formed consisting mainly of us lot of the babe channels forum, I will be challenging CW Pussylover for the chief exec position ofcourse, I promise to allow the babe channels the freedom to do and show as they please so long as they show plenty of pussy, channels that fail to deliver this will be fined accordingly for being too tame
If only
(05-07-2012 20:12 )UntouchableG Wrote: [ -> ]Did anyone see her flash her lovely pussy early hours this morning? it was amazing, best slip i've ever seen and i've been watching for years!
Must have closed my eyes at that moment
, because I saw nothing of the sort.
I saw plenty of uncensored content on Sexcetera though. Quite graphic as well. Maybe some day the actual adult channels will be allowed less censorship.
(05-07-2012 23:21 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]^^ Must have closed my eyes at that moment , because I saw nothing of the sort.
I saw plenty of uncensored content on Sexcetera though. Quite graphic as well. Maybe some day the actual adult channels will be allowed less censorship.
not this thread as well hijacked by the "i hate ofcom" brigade too. this is about teal not ofcom bashing
another good night from teal so far
(05-07-2012 23:56 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]not this thread as well hijacked by the "i hate ofcom" brigade too. this is about teal not ofcom bashing
another good night from teal so far
Maybe you should have a word with Untouchable first
(06-07-2012 00:27 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe you should have a word with Untouchable first
Indeed. These people who post imaginary happenings...it's terrible.
Someone will be along shortly claiming she was cleaning her teeth with the Camerman's cock, or some other deluded rubbish.
(06-07-2012 00:42 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: [ -> ]Indeed. These people who post imaginary happenings...it's terrible.
Someone will be along shortly claiming she was cleaning her teeth with the Camerman's cock, or some other deluded rubbish.
If you say so
It would be nice though if we could refrain from mentioning anything that would get Ofcom to fine these channels. I'm sure you will agree with that, right? Anyone else agree?
(06-07-2012 00:49 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]If you say so
It would be nice though if we could refrain from mentioning anything that would get Ofcom to fine these channels. I'm sure you will agree with that, right? Anyone else agree?
i agree mrmann, i never mention any flashes that i see for that reason
(05-07-2012 20:25 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Can I then propose that a new ofcom panel is formed consisting mainly of us lot of the babe channels forum, I will be challenging CW Pussylover for the chief exec position ofcourse, I promise to allow the babe channels the freedom to do and show as they please so long as they show plenty of pussy, channels that fail to deliver this will be fined accordingly for being too tame If only
Great idea. Content should be decided by a representative panel of ordinary people, not hand picked career civil servants.
Any ideas for a name, apart from "Jury"?