The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Ofcom Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
the problem is if ofcom relaxed the rules completely a lot of our fav girls would no longer want to work on these channels and we would only have the porn girls that we can see on plenty of websites now.i would just like to see the rules relaxed back to 2010 when we had the occasional slip.it was the anticipation of waiting just in case,whereas now we know there is no chance
(08-05-2012 09:56 )oldboy1047 Wrote: [ -> ]the problem is if ofcom relaxed the rules completely a lot of our fav girls would no longer want to work on these channels and we would only have the porn girls that we can see on plenty of websites now.i would just like to see the rules relaxed back to 2010 when we had the occasional slip.it was the anticipation of waiting just in case,whereas now we know there is no chance

thats not entirely true, b/s extreme has models on it that dont go the whole hog, lori for one ,a mix of both x rated and soft core would be the answer to everyones prayers, if only
(08-05-2012 09:56 )oldboy1047 Wrote: [ -> ]the problem is if ofcom relaxed the rules completely a lot of our fav girls would no longer want to work on these channels and we would only have the porn girls that we can see on plenty of websites now.i would just like to see the rules relaxed back to 2010 when we had the occasional slip.it was the anticipation of waiting just in case,whereas now we know there is no chance

that's how i want the babeshow rules to be, back to how they were in 2010 when the babeshows were at their best
i'm not asking to see pussy, just what film and mainstream tv can show. from what i've seen of 2010, they had it spot on. no pussy, no sex, but anything else goes
A bit off topic, but here is a latest Ofcom investigation that I came across on Google, regarding the new film Prometheus.

Ofcom wastes so much time on non issues Rolleyes

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may...s-exlusive

Did a studio exec reach through the TV, strangle someone and force them to buy a ticket? NO!!! Just another example of Ofcom assuming the people of England aren't capable of thinking for themselves Rolleyes
(08-05-2012 10:09 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]that's how i want the babeshow rules to be, back to how they were in 2010 when the babeshows were at their best

2010? You'd have to go back further than that for them to be back at their best in my opinion.
Yes I'd agree try 2006 when we had babestar tv and sexstation tv both FTA showing full nudity aswell as the use of sex toys night after night, but also agree that 2010 was a very good year, it came a close second in my opinion in terms of the babe shows in their greatness so I'd be more than happy if we could at least see now what we were only 2 years ago, with the exception of Babestation the rest are just too tame now and the rules need relaxing to make them once more enjoyable viewing.
And with the Government now set to monitor your Internet thats pretty much it now Sad
Three words: F**KIN NANNY STATEImportantannoyedannoyed
Sexual content is the only area where the limits are different for encrypted and clear content, and the only area where limits differ from DVDs and cinema. Why? Is it uniquely harmful? Uniquely offensive? Of course not.
Reference URL's