The UK Babe Channels Forum

So posters want the babe channels to unite against Ofcom, but are complaining about tame shows on Babestation? You've already identified the problem is Ofcom, but all I see is complaints against Babestation.

(04-03-2012 14:35 )blackjaques Wrote: [ -> ]To further highlight these clowns' (Ofcon) position, I have just had a look at the Babestation Extreme thread where viewers post photos / screen captures from this encrypted show.

They are qute explicit shots of naked women and many close ups of female genitalia.

I wonder if Ofcon could tell us why these images ARE suitable for children, but unsuitable for children if one of therse women were to penetrate themselves on this same channel and for thye same audience.

Hurrah for Ofcon; saving our children !!!!

Hate to contradict you, but Ofcom dont claim the shows are suitable for children. They tolerate full fanny nudity only if there are measures in place to protect kids - encryption and time.

What they say is that penetration shots are not suitable for adults.

(05-03-2012 17:41 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]It surely must be blatantly obvious to Ofcom, that rival channels are the ones making the complaints, as no one else would seriously sit through shows nitpicking. Yet they allow the abuse of their system to continue, which makes them as guilty and ridiculous as the complainers.

Ofcom have said before it doesnt matter if the complaint comes from a rival, what matters is if it is valid. Bit like a traffic warden handing out parking tickets based on tips from a rival minicab firm. Except parking rules are abolutes and dont get ramped up because half a dozen people complain.

Its really like turkeys voting for Christmas at times.

Worryingly a wuick look (wuick? quick) at todays Repression Newsletter reveals half a dozen complaints against babe channels classified Protection Of Under 18s. That might mean day shows.

It is no comfort that the complaints were rejected, someone is launching a bunch of complaints and these could just be start of another campaign. Give it time and Ofcom will let some through or the complainer will find a combination of circumstances and magic words that pushes buttons.

children wont be watching the shows after midnight few years offcom use to let some babechannels girls show there pussy for few seconds they should bring that rule back but only show or flash pussies after midnight onwards

(05-03-2012 17:09 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]its well known the babechannels complain against each other, to try and make the channel go tamer than the one doing the complaint and the complainant will benefit. its ridiculous it goes on, the channels should be joining forces against ofcom

this makes me so angry (and disillusioned) and just reinforces the idea that the people running these shows are a bunch of fuckwits.

if i ever win the euros, i'm gonna take over these shows and fire the lot of them. submit your applications via PM.

(06-03-2012 02:06 )derek purcell28 Wrote: [ -> ]children wont be watching the shows after midnight few years offcom use to let some babechannels girls show there pussy for few seconds they should bring that rule back but only show or flash pussies after midnight onwards

The argument has always been the possibility, not whether they do or not.

(06-03-2012 03:54 )cmiller Wrote: [ -> ] this makes me so angry (and disillusioned) and just reinforces the idea that the people running these shows are a bunch of fuckwits.

Rival Companies are always wanting to get the better of each other, that's nothing new.

(06-03-2012 14:59 )ExtremelyCritical Wrote: [ -> ]Rival Companies are always wanting to get the better of each other, that's nothing new.

yes, but when rival companies normally try to get the better of each other, they don't do so by damaging the market! fuckwits.

(06-03-2012 15:29 )cmiller Wrote: [ -> ]yes, but when rival companies normally try to get the better of each other, they don't do so by damaging the market! fuckwits.

You can't really back-up that it really is because if that was the case then they wouldn't do it.

Besides, from what I can see(take into account that I don't approve of it) say if a rival company got another to shut down to financial issues, then they & other would flourish because the consumers have got to go somewhere, they don't evaporate.

If the best is gone, then you go for second-best as that would be the best.

(06-03-2012 03:54 )cmiller Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-03-2012 17:09 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]its well known the babechannels complain against each other, to try and make the channel go tamer than the one doing the complaint and the complainant will benefit. its ridiculous it goes on, the channels should be joining forces against ofcom

this makes me so angry (and disillusioned) and just reinforces the idea that the people running these shows are a bunch of fuckwits.

if i ever win the euros, i'm gonna take over these shows and fire the lot of them. submit your applications via PM.

Something what makes this even worse is, a few weeks ago one of the bs daytimers tweeted about what the elite daytime shows could get away with (not a shot at ofcom but more the producers) that doesn't help at all cause no doubt some of the more obsessed fanboys out there are also complaining about other channels.

^^^ i don't understand fanboys. i have my favourite babes, but i'll happily watch another channel if another babe is putting on a good show. all the channels have their good and bad nights and go further in different areas to each other. while i might watch one channel more, i will never turn against the other channels because i want them all to be as good as they can