The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586
I think its time for all channels to grass on one another.
I can see far too many inches of flesh on my screen Rolleyes with some ladies thrusting their tits or arse directly at the camera Rolleyes. And the provocative body language, well its appalling and grossly offensive Rolleyes.
All these ladies should be covered in clothing Rolleyes with at least 4 cardigans on while doing live knitting Rolleyes.
Disgusting behaviourRolleyes annoyed Wink.
(28-11-2012 14:24 )Don Tingley Wrote: [ -> ]
(28-11-2012 14:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]can we stop singling out studio66 for grassing up other babechannels. Yes theyve probably done it

Probably?

I thought it was already proved in the Ofcom Discussion thread that Elite put Bang Babes out of business? Or did I read all of that wrong?
Really? Its the first time I have heard of that, but reading the Ofcom Discussion trend, is anyone surprised by what these channels do anymore?

With these channels just grassing each other up at any opportunity to get the upper hand, well I ask myself and others, why should we feel sorry for them?

If they want to destroy each other by going down this road, well they deserve to have the plug pulled from them?

Studio66 are getting investigated, I hear, but do they deserve our sympathy, when they were happy to use the mortal enemy Ofcom to kill off a competitor themselves?

The stupidity of these antics are embarrassing.

Ofcom may implement the rules, but who is at the root of the problem for them being stricter in the first place?

I can't feel sorry for something that causes its own problems, I know it sounds harsh, but I just can't.

The fact that no channel rep acknowledges these grassing up antics, is also embarrassing.
(29-11-2012 00:06 )dan g 27 Wrote: [ -> ]
(28-11-2012 14:24 )Don Tingley Wrote: [ -> ]Probably?

I thought it was already proved in the Ofcom Discussion thread that Elite put Bang Babes out of business? Or did I read all of that wrong?

Really? Its the first time I have heard of that

My post was a question, not an accusation or statement.
In the end we have what we have because of poor channel management instead of fighting for the industry they fight each other they lose because ofcom stop them doing things we lose as viewers because the shows are poor. No sympathy for the channels.
(29-11-2012 00:10 )Don Tingley Wrote: [ -> ]My post was a question, not an accusation or statement.
Sorry man, read it wrong.
agree dan the babeshow grassing each other up does the industry no good at all. if they stopped and just concentrated on their own shows, the channels overall would be a lot better, but cant see that happening and the channels will carry on grassing each other up, cant see them ever coming clean about it
(28-11-2012 07:08 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]that to me says that she wasn't comfortable getting naked(for all u know the producer could of been pushing her to go naked)

Really...this is the same crew who would leave ashley emma lay on a bed half asleep for the night and all of a sudden their "pushing" clare to get naked Rolleyes

Did you even see what happened?

(28-11-2012 12:59 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]I personally don't believe a babe, in this climate, would be pushed into going naked if she didn't want to.

Your spot on kerravon....2012 of all years is the year for girl to be boring as fuck if she wants and not get stick from a producer for it!!

Fact is,she was all set to do a naked session and was told get dressed,which is fair enough if that was the case with all the girls! But it wasnt and ofcom is not the blame because im sure the naked angles sophia and paige were doing an hour later were far more raunchy than clare cover herself with a towel lol
(28-11-2012 11:19 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]this is probably my main annoyance on the forum, forum members posting that it was a poor night unless there is nudity. what complete and total rubbish. there is more to a show/night than nudity. going naked can restrict what a babe does as they usually stay in 1 or 2 positions. for me nudity is the icing on the cake of a show from a babe not a requirement. there was several good non nudity shows last night on the shows. Kandi kay & jennifer jade on rlc along with clare richards, paige turnah, sophia lares and sophia cooke on studio66tv and the icing on the cake was the nudity from lori buckby, studio66 (sophia cooke went naked as did paige turnah) and jemma jey on storm. also ex rlc and now babestation babe lexi lowe has said going naked has killed her shows and one of her quietest nights on rlc call wise was when she went naked. regarding this clare richards non nudity incident, for me it was probably the other way round. the producers wanted clare to go naked and clare refused. i cant remember clare ever going naked on studio66. i dont think there is a leniency towards certain babes going naked either. some babes are happy going naked and some others arent

also all the babechannels are a shadow of their former selves NOT JUST STUDIO66/ELITETV. does annoy me that studio66 gets this comment the most and its hardly commented on regarding the other channels

Fuck me are you an a retainer for making positive comments for these girls. Lets be clear here the channels all of them not just the one mentioned in this thread are a shadow of their former selves. I think a lot of people are just a little of bored of it now and its nothing to do with whether they are naked or not its just fucking boring. Lack of variety, limits to what they can do and overcensorship and the same old faces time and again I rather watch an old film which I am doing now( Animal House on Sky Movies)
^ Fright Night (The original) for me, though I am having a peek at three women every once and again Big Grin
(28-11-2012 11:19 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]regarding this clare richards non nudity incident, for me it was probably the other way round. the producers wanted clare to go naked and clare refused.

How do you work that one out? I admit I didn't see the incident, but from what I understand, Clare stripped and placed a garment between her legs. Seconds later the logo popped up and when the feed came back she was dressed again.

That sounds pretty conclusive and I don't see how it can be seen as anything other than her being told to put her clothes back on by the producer.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586
Reference URL's