15-07-2015, 12:28
@ snookered147
No offence intended, but why are you so seemingly apologetic about not spending your (presumably) hard-earned money on the babe channels? They are a business, not a charity; they do not have a right to an income.
They have chosen to provide a service, and charge handsomely for it - if you, and many others I suspect, no longer feel that they are providing a service of a quality commensurate with the considerable expenditure that results from using that service, that's their problem, not yours.
In addition, as far as I can see, much of what is wrong with the babe channels these days is as a result of hard-headed business decisions by the babe channels (reduced quality of the product resulting in reduced income, resulting in smaller/crap sets, poor production quality/general incompetence, sardine canning, poor stream/picture quality, ever more D.O.G infested screens, babes who get paid irrespective of whether they sit there and do nothing, or actually attempt to put on an overtly sexual performance (and even if they did attempt the latter, potentially get shut down by the producer, hiding behind 'Ofcon won't allow it', when, in reality, it's a deliberate decision to put vaguely adult content on paid for services rather than FTA... the list goes on).
Bottom line, the only thing they're interested in is making money - Given that there are still a surprising (to me, at least) number of channels broadcasting, they must still be making sufficient income (presumably, a large part of which must be from 'new viewers', who know nothing but the dismally tame rubbish that passes for babe channels these days, and therefore accept it as the norm) - whether that continues to be sustainable, or whether we see a continuing decline, and eventual death of the babe channels, is entirely down to them, IMO; it's certainly not our 'responsibility', so there is no need to feel apologetic or guilty.
No offence intended, but why are you so seemingly apologetic about not spending your (presumably) hard-earned money on the babe channels? They are a business, not a charity; they do not have a right to an income.
They have chosen to provide a service, and charge handsomely for it - if you, and many others I suspect, no longer feel that they are providing a service of a quality commensurate with the considerable expenditure that results from using that service, that's their problem, not yours.
In addition, as far as I can see, much of what is wrong with the babe channels these days is as a result of hard-headed business decisions by the babe channels (reduced quality of the product resulting in reduced income, resulting in smaller/crap sets, poor production quality/general incompetence, sardine canning, poor stream/picture quality, ever more D.O.G infested screens, babes who get paid irrespective of whether they sit there and do nothing, or actually attempt to put on an overtly sexual performance (and even if they did attempt the latter, potentially get shut down by the producer, hiding behind 'Ofcon won't allow it', when, in reality, it's a deliberate decision to put vaguely adult content on paid for services rather than FTA... the list goes on).
Bottom line, the only thing they're interested in is making money - Given that there are still a surprising (to me, at least) number of channels broadcasting, they must still be making sufficient income (presumably, a large part of which must be from 'new viewers', who know nothing but the dismally tame rubbish that passes for babe channels these days, and therefore accept it as the norm) - whether that continues to be sustainable, or whether we see a continuing decline, and eventual death of the babe channels, is entirely down to them, IMO; it's certainly not our 'responsibility', so there is no need to feel apologetic or guilty.
.
