(06-07-2013 19:53 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]In 2015 if we are all calling for a return to how the shows used to be in 2013 then that will be the final nail in the coffin for the babe channels as far as I'm concerned.
Here you go SB, pick yourself a winner
![[Image: 8aa240404415819.jpg]](http://thumbnails105.imagebam.com/40442/8aa240404415819.jpg)
^ I pick the nail third from the left.
After all the shows need to go on a downward SPIRAL before the final nail can go in the coffin.
Hmmmmm. I'll get my coat
.
(18-04-2015 04:38 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]What if Louise Porter also did an open leg nude show, I'd dread to think what kind of state of alarm Rammy would end up in seeing that he near enough had a heart attack the other night when she showed a wee bit of bare arse 
Louise went naked on Thursday
if Louise did open leg nude show I'd be wearing a pair of angel wings and a halo
Q: What's the difference between third nail on the left and most babe shows atm?
A: Third nail has a point.
^ The old ones are always the best
.
^ That's what I keep telling the wife.
copyright Les Dawson, 1975.
Well I started to record about 3 streams tonight but then I went fuck it as each potential good session turned to dust very quickly it left me pondering the question just who the fuck are these shows supposed to be aimed at now because nothing has done it for me tonight or in fucking ages.
I was looking through some of the caps and videos the other day on the forum from the 2010 and 2011 era. Now they were proper shows. The channels made an attempt to give you as adult a show within the ofcom rules which BTW haven't changed. The only thing that has changed now is the policy in which the channels interpret the ofcom rules.
In the space of a few years the shows have gone from brilliant to the current horseshit being fed to us now. I suppose in hindsight that Babestation were eventually going to also tame their shows too seeing that nobody else was giving a fuck about pushing the boundaries.
On the positive side, plenty of phone waving tonight, may as many calls dry up as possible across the whole board of channels as its the only way they might even begin to make some attempt of giving us something closer to the above mentioned era.
I wonder if the sort of shows SB referred to back in 2010 & 2011 are now a thing of the past. Just How can they justify that current output can be classed as adult viewing guys?
(22-04-2015 02:55 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]I was looking through some of the caps and videos the other day on the forum from the 2010 and 2011 era. Now they were proper shows. The channels made an attempt to give you as adult a show within the ofcom rules which BTW haven't changed. The only thing that has changed now is the policy in which the channels interpret the ofcom rules.
the rules have not changed much but ofcoms interpretation of them has, things that are quite ok to do by the letter of the rule book are not done because ofcom has made it clear to the channels they don't like them and don't want to see them, the hand thong is a good example,
this has created a situation where the channels are now second guessing what is allowed and making tamer shows, the irony is when a channel dose try something interesting hardly ever is there a problem from ofcom,
