I speak as an admirer of both Kerrie and Lori.
My views on Kerrie are well and recently documented.
With Lori my appreciation for her is to do with her range of position and pose and use of set props.
In the office chair and on the stool set for example.
In the sets with more redeeming features I tend to find Lori makes use of these quite effectively.
The sets with less redeeming features tend not to be to her advantage imo.
I like it when Lori goes for the glamour model poses and she does them reasonably often.
I like it less when things become rather too frenzied and frenetic.
The thing that is missing with Lori is themed outfit striptease.
Catsuit would be the main snookered suggestion.
With Kerrie it is a different ball game.
Kerrie does not necessarily need set props to make things interesting. Kerrie has fluidity of rhythmical movement beyond belief. Her gyration technique is unbelievable.
If Kerrie has room to move this is pretty much all she needs apart from something to slide on
.
Last thing she needs is too much furniture getting in the way
.
She uses her honest enthusiasm and dynamic movement as her major weapon and does it extremely well.
There will always be a whiff of this babe or that babe is too one dimensional in their approach and the counter argument that babes need to play to their strengths.
The truth I suspect lays somewhere in between.
Ideally all babes should look to broaden their nightshow horizons a little and see whether they can take inspiration from different types of performers.
The more babes that do this and the more licence they are given to do it in a sexually enticing fashion the better imo.