The UK Babe Channels Forum

Agreed

(13-11-2016 13:16 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]Pure speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if the producers on all channels make exceptions for some hosts with awful call stats.

For example I really think Caty Cole, Becky Roberts, Cara Brett, Mikaela Witt, Anastasia Harris, Fernanda Ferrari and Sophia Lares were more deserving of a week of celebration before Mikayla Bayliss.

Do agree, there are more babes who have been at s66 a lot longer than Mikayla who should have had a week devoted to them. For me either Sophia Lares who is s66's longest serving babe or Caty Cole is who is retiring from the babeshows fairly soon.

Yes probably are exceptions for some babes with awful call stats, but still think call stats do largely determine most babes shifts etc on the shows. The shows do have to make money most of all

^ completely agree that call stats does have some baring on most presenters employment.

I'm still gutted that Caitlyn Wynters left S66 due to low call stats, she is so beautiful and has a very witty personality.

It'll never happen, but I'd love to see all the channels release their call stats.

We'd all still debate who is the "best" though, like Messi vs Ronaldo.

Also it'd be interesting to see how Mikayla Bayliss' celebration week affected her call stats before, during and after it.

I may be wrong, but I don't think anyone won her signed poster.

I'll be sad to see Caty Cole leave the industry, her 2-4-1 shows in the golden era were so awesome.

(13-11-2016 13:58 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]there are more babes who have been at s66 a lot longer than Mikayla who should have had a week devoted to them. For me either Sophia Lares who is s66's longest serving babe or Caty Cole is who is retiring from the babeshows fairly soon.

There would be no point in doing a promotion on Caty Cole if she's leaving soon.

With the glamour modelling industry being pretty much finished after the death of the lads mags.

Also with their now being only 3 channels, which I fear won't exist after 2020.

I'd be interested to see where all the presenters will end up career wise afterwards.

Most will probably marry businessmen, entertainers or athletes.

I hope the majority stay within the adult entertainment industry and become strippers, escorts, webcam models or pornstars.

If not, they'll hopefully go on to running their own makeup, fashion or beauty businesses.

(13-11-2016 12:34 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ](e.g. laid on their stomach on a bed or sitting in a chair) for 8 hours playing with their phone.

Yeeees. callcenters66/bsn: and that means that they must not move oh ffs!

Hope someday it will die and be reborn in something new, but... And please can anyone break all bed and chairs thanks

(13-11-2016 15:58 )7 stars of the orient Wrote: [ -> ]There would be no point in doing a promotion on Caty Cole if she's leaving soon.

How long has Caty been retiring now? Must be nearly as long as Sophia Knight?

(13-11-2016 02:28 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]The shows are too predictable now unfortunately.
There is painfully little to visually stimulate.

It isn't merely just same old babes in the same old outfits in the same old boring sets doing the same old moves time and again although all that by itself is enough to leave me utterly disheartened and bored senseless.

It is also that channels have become too predictable with running orders and pecking orders.
The same tired routines played out remorselessly.

The shows have become riddled with ridiculously high call costs, gimmicks, unimaginative camerawork, poor lighting, lack of ambition and pervcam getting in the way of television nightshow product being as effective as it could and arguably should be.

The quality of visual product is at all time low.
The cost of interaction with the babes in whatever form is at an all time high as is the capacity and desire to rip off punters left, right and centre.
To cap it all the impression I get is that callers are seen as sad lonely perverts with nothing better to spend their time or money on while non callers are designated as freeloaders. What a thoroughly miserable situation.

If the babeshows are that bad maybe we should scrap the babe of the year awards?

(13-11-2016 10:22 )Rake Wrote: [ -> ]Jay1 - I think there are some on here who are unemployed and on benefits, or are wealthy, and have odd interests, so fill their time analysing every show.

Having said that even for a casual onanist, there is merit in discussing the quality of the material on offer to us to wank over.

I have noticed that it has got boring and stale in the last month or 2 across the channels. Things were looking good for the first 6 months of the year, but for some reason have never recovered from the summer schoool holiday crackdown. Some key points:

- same repetitive rosters of often identikit girls; S66 are the worst for this, having many long stints when, for example, there are 3 or even 4 blondes all dressed similarly.The same old, same old girls.
- unimaginative poses and lack of movement, especially on days. Don't tell me the rules cause this, most of what I see is sheer laziness. Girls laying front down, tits buried in the duvet, texting on their mobiles for hours.
- unimaginative outfits

I am sure someone will be along shortly to say all is well because they must be making the call stats or they wouldn't be doing this.

I agree with much of what you say .

To be honest to improve things they should get rid of all those with injected lips as they look like weird clones of each other , it's like watching a whole family of sisters .

I'd also stipulate that any NEW girls should have to be natural so no more boring fake boobs as they're a complete turnoff for so many of us .

(13-11-2016 22:11 )TitoTata Wrote: [ -> ]I'd also stipulate that any NEW girls should have to be natural so no more boring fake boobs as they're a complete turnoff for so many of us .

Not as boring as you saying you hate enhanced boobs in every post you make