The UK Babe Channels Forum

(02-08-2017 22:13 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]^ Catsuit?

Make it happen Even if we have to forgo the reading part , and just have the catsuit and heels, pleeaase make it happen.

At this point I should say one thing specifically for the attention of Regenerated. It is, as always interesting to exchange opinions on subjects such as these. Despite a seemingly fundamental disagreement on various matters and differing perspectives that help form our opinions expressed I have to say I always appreciate the way you articulate your views even if I sometimes strongly disagree as in this instance. I perhaps see things in a more cynical and hard nosed way but that is not unique to babeshows. It's reflective of my world view generally I'm afraid.

Finally I should also say apologies to all for the length of my earlier post.
I have just tried reading it again and nodded off half way through .
The unerring ability to bore oneself.
Got it down to a fine art .
Doh .

spoke too soon!!
Lucy's stream has just gone for me!!

(02-08-2017 23:05 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Even if we have to forgo the reading part

But that's the best bit .

Who am I trying to kid?

^ I was going to say that 'we'll have to agree to disagree on that one', but I see that you quickly 'came to your senses'.

(02-08-2017 01:42 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]SNIP

I'm expecting nothing less than full-on, hardcore filth when they 'return' in their new postions.

So, instead of the expected hardcore filthfest , we've lost a channel (technically three, I assume)!

(02-08-2017 23:05 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 22:13 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]^ Catsuit?

Make it happen Even if we have to forgo the reading part , and just have the catsuit and heels, pleeaase make it happen.

the persistence is admirable, but I fear evidence from the passage of time is against it....

(03-12-2015 23:37 )M-L-L Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-12-2015 21:15 )bigfatpiggyporker Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-12-2015 21:14 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]A catsuit would be interesting .

And highly arousing!

..what?..this little ol' thing ?...

Every channel should be doing their utmost to make their presenters look as beautiful as possible.

Despite all the advances in technology in the past decade, the production values of all the channels is still terrible.

Bit of a weird one this!

The babeshows have often born comparisions with the world top flight football on this forum. In the same mind, cheekily, I thought the focus of the following piece might benefit recruitment on the shows. What do you guys think?

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40671838

The babeshows being communication based and performance ranked, in theory the system described should be help babes who relate better to their customers to get on to the benefit of everyone.

I suppose though that in reality the pool of babes is too small and well known to everyone doing the hiring. Then, the reasons for wanting to do well as a babe are perhaps too singular to bare much analysis or division. Thirdly, is there even a care about "bringing the game into disrepute" at any level?

I was dying to see Jessie Jensen and Anastasia Harris' arses this evening but they've both been sitting in office chairs all day due to bloody pervecam.

The producers of both of their shows should be sacked for not encouraging them to bend over their desks and shake their cracking arses to the TV cameras as a way to entice callers.