21-06-2017, 17:06
^ I take it this is Xpanded/Playboy from the call costs, two girls on each set, headsets, etc. But she says three channels? I suppose that's the day channel (she says she starts at 8pm) and the two night ones or is she including the FV channel (it's the same bloody content - typical CV type accounting either way from a media type).
Interesting that nearly all their producers are female.
Also the line about callers being fooled by the rubbing... Hmmm, go with it would be nearer the mark I think. These execs always under-estimate a guy's willingness to play along once he's invested. He's hardly gonna stop the babe half way through to complain about her technique. He wants the girl to be into it and having a frig so he ignores the exact positioning of her fingers and concentrates on something else. The babes words most likely whilst pretending her fingers are in the right place.
Whenever producton people are interviewed (even the males) you can always tell they would never go near being on the receiving end of their own product as they invariably stress how deluded the users are. Nothing of the kind in a lot of cases, the correct description is a suspension of disbelief. In other words the act has to be good enough to ignore little descrepancies. It doesn't mean the guy has to believe it all to get off.
The unsubtley of thinking in their descriptions betrays a desire to downcast the guys, and potray them all as mindless dupes.
Interesting that nearly all their producers are female.
Also the line about callers being fooled by the rubbing... Hmmm, go with it would be nearer the mark I think. These execs always under-estimate a guy's willingness to play along once he's invested. He's hardly gonna stop the babe half way through to complain about her technique. He wants the girl to be into it and having a frig so he ignores the exact positioning of her fingers and concentrates on something else. The babes words most likely whilst pretending her fingers are in the right place.
Whenever producton people are interviewed (even the males) you can always tell they would never go near being on the receiving end of their own product as they invariably stress how deluded the users are. Nothing of the kind in a lot of cases, the correct description is a suspension of disbelief. In other words the act has to be good enough to ignore little descrepancies. It doesn't mean the guy has to believe it all to get off.
The unsubtley of thinking in their descriptions betrays a desire to downcast the guys, and potray them all as mindless dupes.
.