^ And tonight seems the same only this time with the extra irritation of babes demanding calls when the quality of performance fails to merit them
Always a bugbear of mine that
You want calls ladies?
In that case put on a stimulating display worthy of their cost and stop behaving like a bunch of spoilt divas
.
Honestly it is beyond embarrassing
.
No visual stimulation = no calls deserved.
£1.53/£1.80/£2.00 per minute? I think not.
Even 60p per minute? Er no.
I feel as though I should be being paid £1000 per minute for being witness to such drivel
.
^ I don't think this article has been linked on the forum to date.
It's only partly about the shows. The relevant bit has the usual words from Porchia Watson and Lucy-Anne about fans and why they do what they do. Interview is from Sexpo event in November last year. Lucy-Anne does confirm that she was picking up between £1,000 and £1,600 (over £2.20 per minute) per TV session at the time. The perve cams presumably hiking the figure to those rates.
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/what-i-l...-sexpo-630
Can we have some proper babe shows instead of just channels hiring babes for their own pleasure.. Eg cameras statically zoomed into the babes face after u see them hiking theirs skirts up to show their arse to the people in the room as the camera pans in which is obviously not for the viewers benefit an also other channels just blatantly advertising their ability of being able to stream with babes on the telly covered by on-screen graphics but showing a webcam between the babes legs
It's a complete joke some if the channels an its only a handful of decent babes to watch
Not in looks but actually doing a TV show which is what this websites suppose to be about
Hence the name !!!!
Some if it is as lame as ....
I only say it coz the camera zoomed into a babes face but ye just seen her as her lower body went out of veiw
She hiked her skirt up for the people she's working with and another channel is a nice babe in a nice dress covered in graphics an as ye got a little peak of panties full graphics were displayed till she obviously fixed the bottom of her dress
The same babe clearly has a webcam between her legs
Some other just sit there and only a few get saucy being sexy sensually flaunting
Big busty chicks braless in skimpy outfits seems to be wrong in this day an age
Bring back the good old days
Party people lads lounge babe station the pad elite TV channel 960 paradise house babe ani
^they're hiking their skirts up for the pervcam mate, not the staff.
(03-03-2016 19:17 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]^they're hiking their skirts up for the pervcam mate, not the staff.
Oh no, you've ruined another mrmann fantasy.
(03-03-2016 23:23 )Pixel Wrote: [ -> ] (03-03-2016 19:17 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]^they're hiking their skirts up for the pervcam mate, not the staff.
Oh no, you've ruined another mrmann fantasy.
Nah, I'd agree with this. I'd say 90% for the perv cam, 10% for the touchy feely producers like Afroman and some others
Just a quick question for those more experienced posters and those who have been viewing the shows for a bit longer.
It seems that back in the day content was bit more explicit or certainly more risque and varied.
Has the content of the intros changed at all?
I was viewing some of the wonderful 'flash the gash' clips earlier and wondered if as well as more adult content on show, did the girls ever use stronger language during their intros or little monologues to camera??
I have heard the odd lass make an amusing slip of the tongue (loved it when Electra Morgan announced "I'm feeling[/align] so fucking horny!" once
)
But just wondered if this kind of language was ever allowed back in the day?
Is anyone else having trouble getting the babechannels on their mobile device? As of yesterday, I can't get any from rampant, babestation, etc. Thanks.
rampant still works for me but I use the Dolphin browser to view it on.
