I love on Twitter how anyone slightly critical of a model is a no life saddo.
The fawning sycophants who chip in to agree obviously go through life like Roger Moore's James Bond. Globe trotting and constantly shagging. Just taking 20 mins away from this glamour to call a babechannel
^
.
Life according to SOME babeshow babes
.
Callers = Sad perverts with nothing better to spend their time or money on. Or drunks
.
Have you seen my wishlist?
Non callers = Saddos and freeloaders who don't understand what a hard life it is being a babeshow babe
How dare you say something remotely critical about me.
Automatic block on Twitter
.
Seen it all before.
Heard it all before.
If babeshows were a department store they should be called Divas r us.
Utterly cringeworthy really.
(25-10-2015 10:47 )Raider007 Wrote: [ -> ]I love on Twitter how anyone slightly critical of a model is a no life saddo.
The fawning sycophants who chip in to agree obviously go through life like Roger Moore's James Bond. Globe trotting and constantly shagging. Just taking 20 mins away from this glamour to call a babechannel
I am wearing my safari suit at this very moment.
how much would each forum member have to chip in to make it a worthwhile proposition? or could we hack talk talk and borrow some of their profits?
Make sure you think up a good name, with a sensible URL to go with it.
PS Roger Moore is the best James Bond
(25-10-2015 17:08 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ].
PS Roger Moore is the best James Bond
Connery all day, then Dalton (seriously underrated). Moore is too cringe-worthy especially in A view to a kill where he is 57 and hes flirting and shagging 20 year olds. Although his earlier Bonds are good.
Just to make it relevant to the thread topic; Unleashed has been doing some really good stuff recently. Full on Girl-Girl 2-4-1s, new faces and Amelia last night. Its the only channel to me that the girls look to be having any fun.
Does anybody have a babe(s) who they simply can't watch, that makes them change channels? Could be for any number of reasons. Interested as we all (the majority) of us put negative posts on here about certain girls for on screen habits, personality or attitude, other dealings outside of the channels, comments made or reported about us the viewers etc. I find some girls attractive but can't watch them as something else has changed my opinion of them? Anybody feel the same?
I do but I make a general point of never naming and shaming
.
There are certain babes who I have had negative experiences with in conversations with them on the phone that I have regarded as an excessive diva like attitude.
Shame really as the babes to whom I refer are rather attractive and easy on the eye.
But attitude is everything and there are some babes whose attitude has appalled me.
Mercifully they are relatively few in number.
But as I say these babes will forever remain nameless
.
surely i can't be "annoyed" ,or even "offended", because a girl, or some girls, or - hypothetically- all of them, thinks that callers are losers, or because they are hypocrital , or something like that...I don't know them personally, and i watch those shows just to enjoy good looking women, who are able
to put on a good show..i mean sexy, exciting shows...as a consequence, the only thing that "bothers" me are girls that spend their nights lying down on a bed, or sitting, doing nearly nothing.. i mean nothing worth of a night show..."attitude"...bah! if the greatest perfomer around (name your favorite), an hypotetical fusion between "prime" jet back and Amanda rendall (
) is a "prima donna", who hates her callers, if she's a haughty and disdainful person..well i'll call her anyway
, without any hard feelings or disdain... their work is put on good/enjoyable shows, not to "like" their callers...so i judge them (and eventually, i could be annoyed by some girls) only for how they work.
PS if a "super-lame" girl is also a super-nice girl, well that's great..If we meet in real life we could build a beautiful friendship.. but surely this is not the reason why I watch these shows