(26-03-2014 08:47 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]if Billy finds a girl ugly subjectively, he has a right to express that.
If someone feels the need to express dissatisfaction with the look of a girl, there are perhaps more diplomatic ways of putting it.
Some people definitely don't know the difference between fair comment and the bile of frenzied abuse.
Been reading some of the recent posts here with interest,while I am not going to resort to abuse,it's a simple fact that the line up's on nights of these shows is no where near what it was,everyone has different tastes but its plain to see that the standard of girls is certainly no where near say, 4 years ago.For what ever reason there is a lack of the more beautiful young glamour type of girls on nights,thinking back to then most nights of the week there was always 3/4 girls on each night that you could say,whow she is stunning,shame it's not like that now.
(26-03-2014 13:23 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ] (26-03-2014 08:47 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]if Billy finds a girl ugly subjectively, he has a right to express that.
If someone feels the need to express dissatisfaction with the look of a girl, there are perhaps more diplomatic ways of putting it.
Billy never mentioned any single girl by name - merely bemoaned the dropping standards. I agree it would be ungentlemanly to to name a specific girl and say she is ugly, but he hasn't done that!
This place is like a totalitarian regime - no criticism is allowed of the beloved babes.
(26-03-2014 15:59 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]Some people definitely don't know the difference between fair comment and the bile of frenzied abuse.
Where is the frenzied abuse and bile? Can't see it myself...
(26-03-2014 18:18 )Lotuseater Wrote: [ -> ]This place is like a totalitarian regime - no criticism is allowed of the beloved babes.
and yet the above posts remain. hmm.....
I presume Lotus was referring to the attitudes of a majority of posters. Not a critique of the mods.
criticism is allowed, even encouraged. this forum is independent of any channels and is not answerable to them. but if criticism strays into personal insults then that's when posts start getting removed. it can be tricky sometimes because one persons personal insult is another's strong criticism and inevitably, someone ends up feeling hard done by. it's a fine line but we try to air on the side of nobody, either model or forum user, getting their feelings hurt or feeling insulted.
Exactly Terence, criticism is ok, but when it gets into personal insults of babeshow babes (often when a babeshow babe has a boob job or gets a tattoo) that isn't ok and the posts should be removed and the forum member who did the personal insult should apologise.
Thankfully most forum members do criticise babeshow babes in a way that is respectful to the babeshow babe they are criticising. A minority of forum members don't do this and really cross the line into personal attacks on babes and it's no wonder some babeshow babes are so negative about the forum and don't go on it and tell other babeshow babes not to go on here
(26-03-2014 19:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]and the forum member who did the personal insult should apologise.
apologise to who, you or terence?