The UK Babe Channels Forum

I'm sitting on the fence on this one, I'm not going to be the forum's real life TMO/VAR - Nigel Owens on this one lol

I will admit I don't like tatoos, fake tits, fake lips or piercings. I like all natural, preferably smaller breasted girls.

However others do like some, or all of those things, so there are girls who fill the fantasies of most people just like there are people in the "real" world that people like or dislike.

If you don't like a particular girl because of tats/plastic/ironwork etc. do what I do, and don't watch them. Don't go online and diss them.

Having said that I am finding that babeshows are now featuring more girls that I can't watch (especially tattoos which actually make me feel nauseous - must be a psychological thing),

I'm not posting a response in relation to any recent contributions in the argument being had on this thread on the subject of an accusation of tattoo shaming. I just wanted to express my own opinion on the prevalence of 'babes' with tattoos. I'm completely ok with small tattoos which don't dominate the surface area of a woman's body, but I do find it off-putting to see the sight of entire arms, legs and torsos covered in dense body-art. A case in point is Paige Turnah on Saturday night. Her arms are now covered in tats (I assume they are permeanent because of the complexity of the design). To me, she has been rendered a 'rock chick', which, while there isn't anything intrinsically wrong with such a characterisation, it does somehow narrow the perception of how I now view her in some indescribable way. Put more simply, to me, it makes her look rougher and less refined in my eyes.

I have to say, I have been quite shocked by the extent to which tattooing has become more and more prevalent. I will freely hold my hands up and say I am one of those people who dislikes the sight of body art on the natural palette of bare skin that in my opinion takes away from what I perceive to be the natural beauty of the human body untarnished

(30-11-2020 03:37 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]

(29-11-2020 21:59 )thor Wrote: [ -> ]Is Rammyrascal always like this? Tattoo shaming? Did he make that up? I don't like tattoos. Am I not supposed to say that? Is it politically incorrect? What is the world coming to?

Too many questions. I need a drink.

As far as I can make out, having read through this shit, Rammy's issue was not that you didn't like tats. I was you calling for those babes to be banned.

Personally I don't like fake tits. Lets ban both and wipe out 95% of all the babes on the channels

NAIL ON THE HEAD!!!!! that’s exactly spot on The Silent Majority. I have no issue with Thor saying he doesn’t like babes with tattoos, that’s absolutely fine, we all don’t like the same babes & find different things with a woman sexy. For example, I find heavily tattooed babes sexy & Thor doesn’t

It was that Thor was saying he wants pretty much all babes that have tattoos to be banned & also saying they had “grungy grisly” tattoos. Both of these comments for me are tattoo shaming the babeshow babes which isn’t ok. Be respectful to those you’re being critical off

Crankshaft’s post is saying the same as Thor’s post, in that he doesn’t like babes who have lots of tattoos, but, he’s done it in a way that doesn’t shame anyone. If Thor had worded his post like crankshaft has, I wouldn’t have reacted like I did.

As PhredE has said. If you don’t like a babe, don’t go online on here or elsewhere and diss them

I think Thor stopped short of personal insults, no issues with the bit about banning them. He can say that. Let the moderators here decide what can & can't be said.

Can I just say I can't believe how many awards Grace Elisabeth is winning i didn't even know who she was until she won these awards i mean some awards ain't the biggest ones but she is still winning them , looks like she is well on her way to win the Ultimate Webshow Babe.

I thought Caty was going to be the only dominator this year but to be fair there does always seem to be 2.

lola throwing a wobbly about her content on a babe forum,wouldnt be this one would it ?

I think women over 70 should be banned from the babeshows whether they've got tattoos or not.

Or is that age shaming?

No, I think your in the clear there.

But only because Patti retired when she did...

(29-11-2020 12:32 )PhredE Wrote: [ -> ]Nowadays any girl starting on Babeshows know that they will have to become, basically, porn performers. However girls who started many years ago, and thought they were just supplementing a career in "glamour"

^ This.

The elephant in the room, I humbly suggest.
Once upon a time there would I assume have been an element of selection about who might be considered to appear on these shows, because they were probably being approached having already appearing across a range of media and established themselves as being stand-out enough to attract the paying customer; not just anyone prepared to sit in a dingy cam site bedroom and to promote themselves on their own subscribers-only web page.

Now it seems a largely self-selecting free-for-all for anyone who cares to film themselves sticking some pink plastic up their chuff.

I dare to suggest this has lowered the bar somewhat.

Err.. what I mean to say is it has introduced a wide and varied selection of types of beauty to the show beyond the narrow patriarchal oppressive "Playboy" mould of physical attractiveness which models were previously forced to adhere to, thereby introducing a glorious new age of equality diversity and relativism that gives all kinds of definitions of beauty a chance to thrive.

Just as long as they film themselves sticking some pink plastic up their chuff.