i think sin is starting to have an effect across the channels, since they went live on sky there has been a marked improvement to RLC and 66, don't get me wrong they are not hitting it every night but a lot more than they where,
think sins consistency is making the others think about what they are putting out or they could be losing callers,
really hope this is the start of some good times
The channels need more babes who are willing to move about a bit. There are too many who are just content with lying down all night.
I wonder if having a babe covered in body paint would make it more interesting as a nude show?
Gents could I please just make a general observation here to a minority within this forum. If you see any vids you like or shows you like praise them by all means but FFS do not mention slips on an open forum. 2 nights running now, first it was smc and now its my vid that got removed all because of careless talk
Interesting to read the comment about the channels improving since Sin started on tv,personally although there has been a general improvement its a far cry from the shows we used to have in the past and perhaps the saddest part is recent over taming of BS on Sky for no good reason,but to balance it up S66 have definately upped their game recently by actually using nightbabes for nightshows,perhaps the only channel still heading the other way is RLC,their shows have been average at best,partly down to big name departures and partly down to poor production,in summary Sin tv has had a positive effect on their rivals since the tv launch,except BS which is a shadow of what it once was and for me is no longer the top babe channel on Sky.
All I ever ask for is some imagination and some common sense thinking.
What I absolutely cannot stand is babes lying or sitting on beds, desks or platforms all night every night.
Unfortunately the shows are dominated by just that.
They are the most laziness inducing, boring, unstimulating and tedious stints of them all.
Even the naked ones are generally dull because the range of position and pose is minimal imo.
Movement, range of position and pose, horny body language and imaginative use of the set are fundamental in making a stint really work well.
Another no no is just bunging two or three babes together on screen with contrasting outfits neither of which bear any relevance to the set with no interaction.
The scheduling, stint management, set choice and attitude of all concerned have to be right.
It simply is not enough to plonk an attractive lady on screen and hope for the best.
There are reasons why my calls dried up in the first place i.e all of the above
.
I'm sure you can't criticise the girls if they have no say in the design of the sets...
It's on the girls to do a good show, production helps but if the girl is great she can make a great show regardless. The same girls deliver and the same ones fail night after night. Sets are nice but not the deal breaker
To my mind, bad direction from a producer on the night can stop whatever girl giving a good performance but poor sets should not be an excuse for a bad show.
If all else is in place any set should suffice though better ones obviously help. Poor sets simply give a girl an excuse to be lazy. But if she does that then it's still the girl's fault not the sets.