^ Agreed but this is not BS related - it’s OnlyFans which I recall advertised itself as messaging directly with the girls. BS of course pull the same trick with their Babecall picture service which claims you are messaging an individual girl when you are not at all.
(13-07-2018 21:50 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ] (13-07-2018 20:32 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]SNIP
that might well happen but i would miss the live in your face occasional pussy slip,seeing it in your face constantly becomes a bit of a bore on perv or private , not as exiting
Live shows should still exist on a babechannel version of netflix or youtube.
Pussy and nip slips are great and I don't want to lose them either.
(13-07-2018 22:57 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ] (13-07-2018 22:31 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ]Oh and for those of you who think you are interacting directly with girls on Onlyfans you are not in many cases as some guy is doing updates for them and replying to messages.
Nothing new with that either. That crap goes all the way back to circa 2010, with the 'private text the girls when they're behind the scenes' service they used to push 
Spot on SecretAgent, I remember Dionne Mendez telling me years ago that if you texted a babe behind the scenes it would actually be one of the behind the scenes crew
the Paul Raymond awards nominations are out today and there are a lot of babeshow girls in them,
always find it interesting how some of the girls who dont get much love on her sometimes can pick up a lot of awards in things like this chose by people in the business
listed the girls who are on the shows at the moment plus who have been on this year
Mayfair girl of the year - Dannii Harwood, Mia Middleton, Olivia Paige
Club girl of the year - Michelle Moist, plus Penny Lee and Chloe Toy
Men Only girl of the year - Brooke Little, LDM, plus Amber Jayne , Chessie Kay
Escort girl of the year - Dani Maye, Lucy Zara plus Tasha Holz, Sophia Delane
Razzle girl of the year - Beth
newcomer of the year - Alexxa Vice, Mia Middleton, Rhiannon Ryder
MILF of year - Lucy Zara, Lynda Leigh, Rebecca More
GG of the year - Alexxa Vice & Ava Austen, Amber Jayne & Georgie Lyall, Candy Sexton & Tasha Holz, Lucy Summers & Charlie Monico, Penny Lee & Dani Maye
Paul Raymond girl of the year - Beth, Dani Maye,
Female of the year - Amber Jayne, Ava Austin, Chessie Kay, Georgie Lyall
The difference between which presenters are popular on the forum, on TV and in the magazines is always interesting.
I don't think any of those nominated hosts have won any of the recent forum awards.
Maybe their business relationships are better with the magazines than they are with the channels or us.
Lucy Zara and Rebecca More are in the Milf category but won't appear on S66 Cougars.
I have recently been watching these channels more out of concern after reading here than being titlated, my concern is the way the girls are directed and in some cases pushed, the proof of my arguement I note that the younger girls are excluded from the exposure of TV onto the web if they do not for want of better phrase - go all the way -
The case in point is Chloe, IMO she was pushed into removing her panties evident in the way she used her hand to cover her embarrassment when obviously forcefully requested to do the POV fully naked a week or so ago, she hasn't had much TV work since and not performed anything other than glamour, which of course these girls are, just glamour models.
I don't know whether it is a top down decision to get the girls to become semi pornographic or the production staff being dirty old men to see as much as they can themselves because it certainly isn't the poor viewer and payer who sees anything, personally if the drift is away from just a topless phone in, then it shoud be a closed set with a female crew, the young girls must be so embarrassed with the male crew leering at their private parts, I don't care what you say, a man is a man.
Recently is has been rowed back from the days when Dannii overtly says she is going to have sex with the crew which was obviously just fake, but never the less it was implyed that if the punter shelled out he or she could see the full monty, recently she has purported that if you are a fan and pay £150 you can see her in action in a video where no faces are shown?
lets hope common sense prevails and the shows are as they are licenced for - a topless phone in, because I fear that the lure of TV exposure, fame and money could see new young hopefuls cruelly exploited and damaged before their careers in glamour and modelling has even got off the ground.
If the spiral toward a porn channel is the way then it will be even more of a rip off with sub fees to pay on top of phone charges, perv cam, shadow play etc etc............and what will the punter see - nothing, what will the crew see - everything, there will be a list a mile long of male applicants for a job at Babestation.
It is all geared to extract as much cash from the viewer as possible with very little to show for the exorbitant cost.
^^Sounds to me more like Babestation turned your job application down then
(20-07-2018 10:14 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ]^^Sounds to me more like Babestation turned your job application down then
As a retired photographer and knowing the industry inside out I am astounded at your ingnorance.
(20-07-2018 09:52 )The Realist Wrote: [ -> ]I have recently been watching these channels more out of concern after reading here than being titlated, my concern is the way the girls are directed and in some cases pushed, the proof of my arguement I note that the younger girls are excluded from the exposure of TV onto the web if they do not for want of better phrase - go all the way -
The case in point is Chloe, IMO she was pushed into removing her panties evident in the way she used her hand to cover her embarrassment when obviously forcefully requested to do the POV fully naked a week or so ago, she hasn't had much TV work since and not performed anything other than glamour, which of course these girls are, just glamour models.
I don't know whether it is a top down decision to get the girls to become semi pornographic or the production staff being dirty old men to see as much as they can themselves because it certainly isn't the poor viewer and payer who sees anything, personally if the drift is away from just a topless phone in, then it shoud be a closed set with a female crew, the young girls must be so embarrassed with the male crew leering at their private parts, I don't care what you say, a man is a man.
Recently is has been rowed back from the days when Dannii overtly says she is going to have sex with the crew which was obviously just fake, but never the less it was implyed that if the punter shelled out he or she could see the full monty, recently she has purported that if you are a fan and pay £150 you can see her in action in a video where no faces are shown?
lets hope common sense prevails and the shows are as they are licenced for - a topless phone in, because I fear that the lure of TV exposure, fame and money could see new young hopefuls cruelly exploited and damaged before their careers in glamour and modelling has even got off the ground.
It's a myth that women do what they do to please or to gratify the gaze of men, or to receive their "validation". We sometimes do stuff for money, I grant you, but that's our choice. Otherwise we dress or undress to please ourselves. We wear short skirts to please ourselves. We wear so-called "revealing" tops to please ourselves. We sunbathe topless to please ourselves. We go naked on the beach to please ourselves. Sometimes I just feel like being naked! It's best not to make too many assumptions about our "victimhood". Yes, the patriarchy affects us, as the #meetoo movement shows, but not so much in this context.
All the channels should be getting their presenters to create photoshoots, videoshoots, TV, webcam content on a regular basis.
Fernanda Ferrari & Sophia Lares haven't do any photos or videos for S66 in eons.