I can't remember all the babes that did Page 3 and lads mags, then went onto working on the channels.
But Caitlin Wynters, Gemma Jane, Gemma Massey, Kitty Lea, Alice Goodwin, Hannah Claydon, Charmaine Sinclair are/were great.
Who's to blame for the dire state of the channels today?
The owners?...... No: they need to make a profit to keep their business viable.
The girls?...... No: they need to earn money - it's their job.
It's the blokes (aka mugs) who spend large sums of money on private shows and the detestable pervcam who are to blame.
As long as these idiots keep chucking credits at the girls, the channels will never improve.
I am also staggered by the lavish compliments these fools pay to girls who would never have got close to an audition for the channels a few years ago when almost all the girls were really attractive and sexy (and tat free!)
Postcript
FTA (I finally worked out what that means, I think - free to air)
Punters that spend obscene amounts on buzzes and calls, are no different than punters that spend obscene amounts on privates and pervcam.
The channels and babes are always going to cater their product and services to the small handful of punters that spend £10,000+ per month.
Rather than the punters that watch FTA online, beg for stuff in the chatbox and barely spend any money. Capitalism makes the world go round.
We've just got to accept the the channels in 2032 will change again and find another gimmick (VR or sex dolls) that punters will pay for.
Just like how they're different from their 2002 (Satellite and calls).
2012 (Freeview, satellite, online, calls and texts).
And 2022 (Freeview, satellite, online, calls, VIP members, Mr P shows, BS merchandise, pervcam, private cam and vibetoys) versions.
The VR part I would say probably could happen before we reach 2032
I think babe channels on Freeview channels will be a thing of the past by the end of 2025
Four girls on tonight across the three channels left broadcasting and all four of them are at least dress size 14 or bigger. What a sad state of affairs. Remember when the babeshow girls were beautiful and had figures you wish your wife or girlfriend had? Well I'm glad my size 10 wife is slimmer than these four. Staying in shape used to be a prerequisite for being a successful glamour model. No longer apparently.
(18-09-2022 22:10 )RyanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]Four girls on tonight across the three channels left broadcasting and all four of them are at least dress size 14 or bigger. What a sad state of affairs. Remember when the babeshow girls were beautiful and had figures you wish your wife or girlfriend had? Well I'm glad my size 10 wife is slimmer than these four. Staying in shape used to be a prerequisite for being a successful glamour model. No longer apparently.
I honestly wouldn't go that low on a night out. 6 pints in or not. These girls aren't fit.
(17-08-2022 12:57 )ryuken Wrote: [ -> ]Mikkaela said in her chatbox that she's finishing her show early.
It must be hard for her seeing punters watching her show for free, but not spending any money.
But the babes forget that the channel that they work for pay them per show its the add ons bonus that these babes want
None of the Valkyries are size 14.
Maybe I'll get them to swoop down on the channels one night and let them "strut their stuff" as they say in Valhalla.
Just one snag: they need to return with the soul of a dead hero.
Any volunteers?
No takers? I thought not.
But that's because you don't know what you're missing.
Okay, you have to fight a battle every day in Valhalla and get killed, sometimes horribly.
But then you get resurrected in the evening and apart from all the feasting and drinking, you get to watch old classic shows from the channels which have been deleted down here on Midgard and, because you're a hero, you can wank yourself silly all night until its time for bed.
Next day - same again!
Although I don't know who were the "Four girls on tonight across the three channels left broadcasting and all four of them are at least dress size 14 or bigger.", referred to in post 5685, from 18/09/2022 at 22:10, it would seem that I'm not alone, in not having a problem as such, with women bigger than size (1)0.
There are plenty of stick-thin fashion models to watch, in catwalk/'runway' shows, if you look for them. But like the character in Goodness Gracious Me, the poster evidently already has "better at home".
However, there is what in philosophical terms is called a category mistake, as one of the ways' distinguishing 'glamour girls' historically, is that they've never necessarily been skinny.
I did link a late blogger's post with a wider definition of glamour, in a forum post earlier in the year, but there are plenty of accounts of models' choosing to do 'glamour', because fashion modelling had such a narrow scope.
Albeit that was before the more recent turn towards purportedly 'body positive' fashion, which actually covers the figures of most women.
Plus, I did write about the bimbofication scene, in one or two of my earliest forum posts, a couple years ago.