(20-07-2015 12:27 )ColinRB Wrote: [ -> ] (20-07-2015 12:22 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]... so it must be the bosses of the channels that the girls left to go there?
Yes I think that's right but names are not allowed.
babestations own forum representative logged in, specifically to gloat when things started to go tits up.
Babestation have taken back Beth and Tiffany
(20-07-2015 12:02 )ColinRB Wrote: [ -> ] (19-07-2015 15:28 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]Will the babes be paid all the money they are owed?
I understand some babes need the money they are owed and are having to sell assets (car etc) to pay the mortgage. Not good times for some. Some have been told by photographers don't come for a shoot I cannot sell your pictures at the moment. There is a lot of politics in the babe industry at the moment and unhappy men causing problems.
(20-07-2015 11:33 )southlondonphil Wrote: [ -> ]The latest news on Sin TV is that they have been texting girls today saying that they have a new studio and will be back on air in September.
I believe similar texts have been sent out each week for the last few weeks, that's why some babes were persuaded to work. It's just wait and see, but don't hold your breath!
I'm not holding my break about sin coming back, even if they had the money, would anyone go to work there, I very much doubt it
I doubt the new studio will have the same upmarket central London location as the old one, probably it will be in a run down area where even the Rottweiler's go round in pairs.
I agree with Rammy, noones gonna go back now they've heard they're not paying babes.
(20-07-2015 12:14 )ColinRB Wrote: [ -> ] (20-07-2015 12:10 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]Why would that be?
Some unhappy men in the industry still have some influences!
Or exclusive image contracts still tied up with Sin - not formally ended? Just a thought. May be just spitefulness you suggest.
^^ Girls would be incredibly naïve to sign up to 'exclusive' contracts for images etc. I well recall when I had the good fortune to meet dear Jo (Guest) and she was telling all present that one of her clients was trying to persuade her to do just that. Se had the good sense to refuse.
No. I alluded to something similar way back in the discussion. A classic case of ex-employer revenge for lack of loyalty.
^^ Girls will be equally naïve to go back to them.
But the sad thing is that they will play on the financial vunerability of those girls who really do need the money to pay the bills.
The girls who where at sin who haven't found work at other channels may go back as they have nothing to lose, but it would be a high risk strategy for any of the girls who have found themselves a new channel if they went back to sin.
Good luck to them if they are coming back in September it takes guts and character to come back again having failed before.