To Quote Kara's twitter page 30mins ago
Miss de la Hoyde ✌
@Miss_Delahoyde
Guess what?!? I'm comming home to @S66TV. and not got to wait long il be back @ 3 tomorrow
(30-06-2015 15:13 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ] (30-06-2015 15:10 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure I'd call making a post lurking!
Would 'gloating' be a better description? 
Yep and not on in that case as it shows a lack of class and respect to those at sintv who by look of things will be out of work soon and haven't been paid for at least a month.
I also feel bad for sintv as it looks like they are going out of business, hope everyone owed money gets that money and as many sintv babes as possible get new channels.
Agree it's sintv management/owners that's to blame for the soon to be exctinct sintv. Spending way too much money on babes etc and not getting enough calls to get that money back.
Expecting a flurry of tweets etc from sin babes announcing moves to other shows
No reason to dis-believe the earlier comment about the higher wages but that kinda sums up the mentality of those behind this.
Just consider all the extra phone minutes they have to generate to cover that. I suppose their thinking was that the webstreams would cover that but then they compounded the issue by having streams that were un-sustainable at server level.
Lose the confidence of your core audience and you have lost the plot.
The 'big fish' was little more than a sardine.
(30-06-2015 15:59 )Kenny76 Wrote: [ -> ]To Quote Kara's twitter page 30mins ago
Miss de la Hoyde ✌
@Miss_Delahoyde
Guess what?!? I'm comming home to @S66TV. and not got to wait long il be back @ 3 tomorrow
A fortunate girl indeed. Guess there is a large plate of humble pie just waiting for her.
(might be doing the 'at home'/webcam that is being trialled by Cara as I write this)
(30-06-2015 16:08 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]No reason to dis-believe the earlier comment about the higher wages but that kinda sums up the mentality of those behind this.
Just consider all the extra phone minutes they have to generate to cover that. I suppose their thinking was that the webstreams would cover that but then they compounded the issue by having streams that were un-sustainable at server level.
Lose the confidence of your core audience and you have lost the plot.
The 'big fish' was little more than a sardine.
I was an avid critic of SinTV's streams and what they offered - I was never happy watching for 30mins and then the team cutting the feed for an hour at least then putting it back on after i got fed up and went to bed. The number of girls they had in on one night compared to the webstreams, three girls on screen etc, it did not work. SinTV did not listen to their core viewers who were talking about this, and it just got worse, now models not being paid and as Rammy said, it's a management error. They sign the girls, they negotiate the contracts, they agree the wages - too much money going out, not enogh coming in. this is what happens when fans are unhappy with what they see, they turn off, and this is what happens. So, we have a channel that had so much potential, now potentially gone from the air permanently.
Bex has said on her Twitter to someone she won't be back on SinTV (just saw it although this may already known by all of you)
.
(30-06-2015 16:11 )Erimus Wrote: [ -> ]
The plot thickens......
Rather ironic if, indeed, that happens. At least I then get to, as promised, mis-quote Mark Twain.
So, in anticipation of that, I wonder if, in an attempt to save their skins (assuming of course there is money in the bank to pay those prepared to gamble by showing up) they cut out the loss-making day-shows and just concentrate on the loss-making night-shows.
I wonder how much grovelling and apologising has been done today....