The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
Just to clear a few things up, broadcasters/licencees do need to provide Ofcom with full company details including shareholder and director info and company accounts including the latest accounts available, they need to do this when first applying for a licence and again when providing Ofcom with their annual company report and renewing their existing licence .

The company behind Sin TV is a new company, so wouldn't be able to give much company account details, although they would still need to give Ofcom all company details Ofcom require
Ofcom has a duty to ensure prospective company's applying for a broadcasting license are fit and proper to hold a licence, new company's that can't provide accounts will i assume need to assure Ofcom that they have finances required to be able to broadcast TV programs and hold a licence .

I read a article somewhere that Ofcom were supposedly going to be more diligent and doing more checks concerning the finances of company's applying for new licences (or something like that) as they didn't want company's setting up new channels with limited finances running out of money, resulting in various other company's needed to broadcast TV programs not getting paid, i think that was the jist of it anyway .

So if the girls/staff not getting paid is due to the company behind Sin TV running out of money, then Ofcom has granted a licence to a company that after a very short time has no money left in the Kitty, so maybe that could be a concern for Ofcom ? .


Concerning what i posted about broadcast licencees having their licences revoked for reasons other than what is broadcast on screen etc, i was talking about all broadcasters/licencees in general, not specifically about babe channel broadcasters .

Just to clarify, as far as i'm aware the babe channels that so far have had their licenses revoked for various reasons are : Babe Star, Bang Babes, Babeworld, House Of Fun, The Other Side, Live 960 .

All were separate licencees on paper a believe, Ofcom revoked the licences of channels named, Babeworld, The House Of Fun and The Other Side, because in Ofcom's view they had lost control of what was being broadcast on those channels, (or something like that) .
A contributing factor to Live 960 having it's licence revoked, was i believe that they repeatedly failed to give the updated director details to Ofcom (or something like that)
^ I would expect they've already been trying to do that presumably without success.
(18-07-2015 12:34 )kevin symons Wrote: [ -> ]A lot of people are claiming that Sin TV is finished and about to fold, but I don't think that's certain (not yet anyway).

Seems certain enough Smile

[Image: image-0465_55AA3D58.jpg]
Thats now Beth and Ally confirming Sin TV has closed that for me confirms 100%. They must of got that information from the producers themselves. Also the Sin TV Twitter account is favoriting farewell tweets...

[Image: image-2F2B_55AA40F7.jpg]
^ Quite. It was laughable to suggest they could be resurrected Lazarus-like for a second time!
(18-07-2015 12:39 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]So if the girls/staff not getting paid is due to the company behind Sin TV running out of money, then Ofcom has granted a licence to a company that after a very short time has no money left in the Kitty, so maybe that could be a concern for Ofcom ? .

No, absolutely not. Ofcom have never withdrawn a broadcasting license for those reasons. Insolvent companies have often been allowed to continue broadcasting.
(18-07-2015 13:05 )retah-rotaredom Wrote: [ -> ]^ Quite. It was laughable to suggest they could be resurrected Lazarus-like for a second time!

They were never resurrected a first time.

In order to be resurrected a first time they would have had to resolve their financial problems, which they never did.
It's odd that they are still broadcasting.
Hmmn.

Kara is now saying that one of the people behind this was done for embezzlement. His assets are frozen so there is zilch chance of anyone getting money out of this.

My boxset for tonight is 'Chancer'
(18-07-2015 13:20 )elgar1uk Wrote: [ -> ]It's odd that they are still broadcasting.

If you call transmiting a continuous loop from an internet feed "Broadcasting"

If the feed bill goes unpaid then that will soon stop.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
Reference URL's