(17-05-2015 10:34 )grantorino Wrote: [ -> ]you can't buy empty slots on sky like 944, but could buy 945 from babestation as they hardly make use of it? doubt they have resources to buy TVX though
^ They don't need to buy TVX surely, they just rent the space (and epg slot on Sky) that TVX are vacating. No?
^ Would it be vacant? If they're trying to sell TVX as a going concern, would that not include the epg slot?
^ For now. Are there that many porn providers with a spare £4mil that would want the whole thing do you think? This forum lists five Sky slots in their control. Do you not see at least one of those becoming available? It's not like anyone outside the 900's would want them.
(17-05-2015 10:16 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ].
Also can I say no need for the attacks on me when disagreeing with me. Fair enough you disagree with what I'm saying but no need for insults
The forum is about having opinions and debating them, not to attack other forum members like I've had to deal with. Show some respect.
You show other members of this forum zero respect!! You constantly insult everybody's intelligence with your posts, disagreeing with everybody and anybody as soon as they give an opinion which is not bland but construed as 'negative' by you . Where is the respect there? If you show respect you will get it back!!
just to clarify, i removed some content that strayed over the line. rammyrascals above comment was made before it was removed. his post was also edited.
(17-05-2015 11:54 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]It's not like anyone outside the 900's would want them.
That's surely not correct. Because anyone who buys an EPG slot can ask to have it transferred (or find it transferred) to another category. Wasn't Babestation originally broadcast in a different category until Sky changed the EPG number and moved it into adult?
(17-05-2015 12:40 )Whynot Wrote: [ -> ] (17-05-2015 10:16 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ].
Also can I say no need for the attacks on me when disagreeing with me. Fair enough you disagree with what I'm saying but no need for insults
The forum is about having opinions and debating them, not to attack other forum members like I've had to deal with. Show some respect.
You show other members of this forum zero respect!! You constantly insult everybody's intelligence with your posts, disagreeing with everybody and anybody as soon as they give an opinion which is not bland but construed as 'negative' by you . Where is the respect there? If you show respect you will get it back!!
Totally agree. Why is he over-protected by the 'moderator'??????
^overprotected! lol! have you read the last 20 or so pages of this thread? strange way to overprotect someone!
you personally insulted him. this was removed. end of story.
phew, glad that's that sorted! it's now safe for you to remove your tinfoil hat.
(17-05-2015 01:53 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]not counting Stevie-Louise myself as she never officially joined sintv as far as im concerned she only appeared once I think on a sintv web only test show.
Don't talk rubbish Rammy, Stevie was a Sin TV girl as far as Sin TV were concerned , she was being paid by Sin TV, she was shown in their list of girls .
Sin TV were heavenly promoting Stevie and her shows via Twitter and posting caps of her shows on their twitter account.
She did shows on different dates, she did solo shows and shows with other girls, Sin TV even re tweeted one of winsaw's tweets were he said she was a good signing for them .
The shows that Stevie was doing at that time were live phone in shows, Stevie was working for Sin TV and doing the same job as girls such as Louise Porter Tori Lee, Kerry Louise were at that time . ie taking live phone calls, it wasn't just testing .
Below are some of your posts made in Stevie's Sin thread when she was a Sin TV girl (according to you lol)
(25-03-2015 16:52 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]I think stevie's a good signing. been on the babeshows for many years and will have a big fanbase to bring with her who will call her
Yes Rammy, i thought she was a good signing for Sin tv as well
(29-04-2015 21:11 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Stevie-lou's moved channels again, she's on stormtv tonight. Does this mean she's been on all the current active babeshows, stevie-lou been on bs, s66/elitetv, sintv and now storm.
Yes Rammy, Stevie has left Sin tv, and has moved to Storm like you say . .
(29-04-2015 21:42 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Think stevie-lou did appear on 942, not 100% sure though
Ill take you word for it but not sure either .
(17-05-2015 13:11 )Doc Holliday Wrote: [ -> ] (17-05-2015 11:54 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ]It's not like anyone outside the 900's would want them.
That's surely not correct. Because anyone who buys an EPG slot can ask to have it transferred (or find it transferred) to another category. Wasn't Babestation originally broadcast in a different category until Sky changed the EPG number and moved it into adult?
Yep my poor rational there. Don't suppose there's anything to stop anyone renting the epg/frequency asking for a move. Babestation was moved into the Adult Section on Sky when the section was created I believe.