(22-04-2015 18:36 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ][T]he channels last night [...] all equally bored the arse off me.
In order not get jaded, I limit my viewing. These shows work best as a 'treat.' If you watch any of them for hours-on-end, day after day, week after week, their effectiveness is bound to lessen (it's like an increasing tolerance to drugs, innit). This has nothing to do with Sin's team of babes, which is, as some have already pointed out, a very strong one.
I'm not having a dig at any of the members but this channel seems to be getting a lot of over the top praise. Mellie thanks for coming on this forum and reading all the feedback but I'll treat this channel with the same objectivity that I do with the rest.
I know that you probably don't like to read criticism but apart from the X Streams and a few fleeting moments on the TV feed (IE Jada naked in oil) the only thing that Sin TV has offered me is an additional babe channel. As I said in my previous post it would be rather unfair of me to single this channel out as none of them were good last night in my opinion.
Once again I wish this channel all the best in the long term but in the short term I've yet to be won over but what I've seen so far.
I don't think I'm being over the top overall with my praise of sintv. Yes I did go ott when Louise Porter went naked for the first time during her 6yrs on the babeshows to date, but overall think my comments about sintv as a whole haven't been ott and still think it's done very well in its short time in existence (about a month) and in the long term will do very well if it keeps going like it is so far
Wishing to appear diplomatic, Mellie (but do prove me wrong) is not doing this on her own initiative. Channels do not usually like staff 'mixing it'. Best to make hay while the sun shines in this respect. It will not last that long.
Rammy please don't try and kid yourself on, you're fooling nobody. Back in 2010 when Bluebird TV launched you were also one of those who posted criticism and the same with the short lived ETV and now we have Sin TV.
Out of those 3 channels only one of them has an active channel rep poster. All I'm saying is would you be heaping the same amount of praise on Sin TV if Mellie wasn't a regular log in channel babe and rep. Seems rather convenient don't you think
Rammy I'd go as far to say that if Lori Buckby were to suddenly start also logging into this forum too that you'd be straight onto her thread praising her for all that its worth. Its just one thing that I've noticed with yourself Rammy that as soon as we have a girl in pink contribute to this forum then all objectivity you might have had goes out the window.
I wonder why............Hm............
Disagree with both points your making db83 I think mellie d is doing this on her own initiative, coming here asking for our comments and opinions on sintv and then taking them to the sintv bosses. also disagree with you saying sintv won't last that long. Everything that Sintv has done so far, the babes they've signed, the sets, the website etc all indicate to me they want to be in it for the long term and I think they will be. Won't be a short term thing like your hinting at db83
Sb what I post on here is not influenced in anyway by anyone or anything. They are my own unbiased, honest comments, just like you keep insisting your posts are, I would have posted the same comments about sintv even if mellie d hadn't joined. If Lori buckby joined the forum I would not go on her thread praising her for all its worth. As I've said for ages and ages and ages and ages now, Lori buckby does nothing for me, so why would I comment in babeshow babe's thread like lori's if I don't like her, it's pointless
I'm not kidding myself at all and know I'm not fooling anyone because of what I've just said
Rammy.
You read me wrong.
All I say is that the feedback with Mellie will not last long.
This is a free forum so by all means post as you think fit just as I will do. Others will judge you by your comments as they will by mine.
Rammy I've said my peace and you've said yours. I see no point whatever entering into another long winded battle with yourself.
You responded to my comments about some members going OTT despite me not singling your name out but you felt compelled to post nonetheless.
I noticed since day 1 that Sin TV would now be the channel you would defend no matter what for reasons which I have already given.
Your signature even now says I'm A Sinner, lets just leave it at that I think.
(22-04-2015 20:12 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Disagree with both points your making db83 I think mellie d is doing this on her own initiative, coming here asking for our comments and opinions on sintv and then taking them to the sintv bosses. also disagree with you saying sintv won't last that long. Everything that Sintv has done so far, the babes they've signed, the sets, the website etc all indicate to me they want to be in it for the long term and I think they will be. Won't be a short term thing like your hinting at db83
Sb what I post on here is not influenced in anyway by anyone or anything. They are my own unbiased, honest comments, just like you keep insisting your posts are, I would have posted the same comments about sintv even if mellie d hadn't joined. If Lori buckby joined the forum I would not go on her thread praising her for all its worth. As I've said for ages and ages and ages and ages now, Lori buckby does nothing for me, so why would I comment in babeshow babe's thread like lori's if I don't like her, it's pointless
I'm not kidding myself at all and know I'm not fooling anyone because of what I've just said
Sorry to hijack the discussion but I think Scottishbloke has a valid point - there are many posts from you in the Elite threads where you praise Lori to the hilt. Don't think there are so many in her Babestation thread though....wonder why?!
(22-04-2015 18:03 )bazzae123 Wrote: [ -> ]Can somebody please let me know all this is happening? I watched until circa 12:30pm and didn't see much at all, just Lacy waving a phone around and looking pretty bored!
The xstreams are indeed a different kettle of fish. They are all too often still in desperate need of finding their audience. Or more accurately of their audience finding them. Only time will tell if the casual viewers are prepared to catch up with this advance. Is the message not out there enough yet or are Sin experiencing 'customer resistance'? They need to do more to solve that one for sure.
They could definitely do with a second TV channel too.
As for last night, I too gave up around 12.30 when it looked like Lacey wasn't going to get a sniff after being busy with calls on her TV stint. To be fair though looking at a recording of her stream session she did get several calls after that point. Probably not enough of 'em still.
(22-04-2015 19:35 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]...I'll treat this channel with the same objectivity that I do with the rest...
I doubt anyone of us (definitely not me) can be truly objective about the babe shows. Surely it's all subjective - style, performance, attractiveness. Your "over the top" praise reflects another man's exact cup of tea.
We all what different things from the babe shows; some of us
very specific things. All round, the most that can be hoped for is a pleasing standard that offers what the majority are looking for - to expect anything more than that would be foolhardy. Is anyone's views of what a babe show should have in it the right one? Offering opinions about it on here is one thing, expecting everyone to think the same as you is another. (Not having a go at you with this specifically SB, just the tone of some posts on this board in general sometimes give off this vibe.)
(22-04-2015 19:55 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]Wishing to appear diplomatic, Mellie (but do prove me wrong) is not doing this on her own initiative...
You're trying to say she is channel promoting? Well I don't think anyone has said otherwise... I'd still rather have her here than not.