(03-07-2015 18:53 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ]Only recently noticed this post, anyway iv'e done a bit of checking and Sin TV does have a Digital Terrestrial TV Licence, but it is not a regular freeview TV licence, it's a licence for broadcasting on TV via the internet, info here http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/radiolice...7sintv.htm
The company that holds the Sin TV DTAS freeview licence is different to the company that holds the Sin TV Sky/Satellite TV licence .
Interesting.
Maybe the backers of the freeview side pulled out of the association at the last minute causing some of the flap that we have seen over the last week or so.
There is bound to be some stuff we know nothing about in all this.
According to the website of the company holding that license, they put channels onto FreeviewHD, so the plan is/was to launch an HD channel, not just a normal channel.
3 girls in the room could work if the production was willing to put another cam in there. preferably manned so it can get more than just static shots.
(03-07-2015 21:14 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]3 girls in the room could work if the production was willing to put another cam in there. preferably manned so it can get more than just static shots.
Excellent post, but you have to look at it from two perspectives. Three girls on screen, one camera, that's bad, but, even two cameras are bad. Would need 4, one static camera for full shots, three others focusing on the girls. A caller may just want a hot sexy chat and not worry about what is on the screen, indeed, they may even have the number on speedial on their phone, but the main issue is for those that actually want to camera to interact with one of the girls, that requires the camera operator to use the camera to give the caller what they want... ok, with one it's possible, with tho callers, it's impossible, even worse if it's three callers wanting the same thing (rare odds, but it can happen). Now we have a camera operator that does not know what to do, where to point the camera. It's one of the reasons why i hate the 3 girls on screen so much. You just don't get anything form it. Ree Petra on her own was magnificent, put her in the room with two other girls and i felt that she wasn't interested. Maybe its was just me, i dunno, but three girls on screen isn't worth it. Better to have extra streams on the website (although at this poresent time i'm pretty sure that will never ever happen), and there is your solution
If your watching on the web stream with the three girls on set, keep the tv feed with all three, and have independant freehand cameras for the girls doing close ups etc for their callers. A web stream for each would justify that and at least those that do watch online are getting more for their money.
Well, that's my thoughts on this anyway, but let me say again, your post is an excellent idea
(03-07-2015 21:14 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]3 girls in the room could work if the production was willing to put another cam in there. preferably manned so it can get more than just static shots.
Well that's never gonna happen, this is sin TV after all. I think there's more chance of Rammy and scottishbloke agreeing about something
(03-07-2015 13:12 )ILoveBrunettes Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2015 13:07 )Roger Patterson Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2015 12:03 )ILoveBrunettes Wrote: [ -> ]is it live on TV? I don't know
Yes it's live on TV now. AllyLou and another girl I don't recognise. Coming over loud and clear - a bit too loud actually, they should turn the mic down.
I don't have SKY so would not know unfortunately, website is still down too for a *ahem* rather long time of 'maintenance' 
Go to rampant tv and watch there
After a brief look at Sin /Sky TV tonight I changed channels to Babestation
Also I don't know why but the some of girls always seemed reluctant to put on a show when on the webstream , Dionne who has been on Babestation unleashed , ree and Kerry who used to do porn. not one web show I've seen from them felt webstream worthy, don't get me wrong they were decent shows but it always disappointing to see something advertised as x-stream or xxx and then get something you could have seen on TV a few years ago
(30-06-2015 14:36 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ]
Just seen this
This lot might have the business acumen of a goldfish, but I don't think I've seen anyone mention they've been ripped off by them, yet.
Maybe that's where they've been going wrong, eh?
Get your own house in order, then you can come over here and gloat
After a brief look at Sin TV then all the other babe channels tonight I just laughed heartily at the same old tedium across the board and switched over to the BBC News channel.
Perfect night for a thunderstorm to wreck the TV picture and force me to go to bed