Are thery trying to outdo BS in the boredom stakes? Whoever is running this channel needs to read this :-
YOU ARE NOT AT BS ANY MORE!! WE EXPECTED SIN TV TO BE A TOTALLY FRESH NEW INNOVATIVE BABE CHANNEL AND FOR A FEW WEEKS IT WAS NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO OUT DO BS BY BEING MORE BORING THAN THEY ARE!! JUST LET THE BABES LOOSE AND LET THEM DO WAHT THEY WANT, OTHERWISE YOU ARE WASTING MONEY!! AND USING CHANNELS THAT EXISTING BABE SHOWS WOULD BE BETTER OFF OPERATING ON!!
SORT THI MESS OUT ASAP
THANK YOU!!
It's too expensive for a new channel.
They can't expect to charge the same rates as some of the more established channels.
Perhaps they wouldn't need to remain at 60p/min like Xpanded because they offer a better service, but to get things rolling it might have been a better plan to come in that bit cheaper.
They're still a relatively unknown quantity, people are more economical with their money these days and rightly so.
(11-05-2015 07:16 )Count von Scharnhorst Wrote: [ -> ]You almost get the impression the channel doesn't give a monkeys about pulling calls in.
I'm wondering if my theory of a behind the scenes bust up is starting to ring true...
(11-05-2015 01:33 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ] (11-05-2015 00:36 )James Petros Wrote: [ -> ]Looking at Bex Shiners Twitter, seems like if they don't get enough calls, they are pulled from the stint they're doing
Just had a look at her twitter, quite sad to see a girl begging for calls like that, don't paint sin in a good light,
By the look of it she did not get any calls on the xstream and was very happy to get on tv, makes me wonder if that's the norm for all girls,
Could be the girls don't want to go on their as it hurts the overall minutes for the night
So what you are saying is that you believe the girls are paid pro-rata for on-screen time ?
And, yes, I have seen many examples of girls literally begging for calls and being pulled off after 20/30 mins.
But if, as has been stated, the people behind he scenes are ex Bs then how do you expect them to work ?. That is what they are used to.
last night was pretty dire imo... tuned in at 9 to see 4 girls on the streams and tv.
tuned in about 10:30 and every 1 had gone. tuned in a couple more times and didnt see any other girls apart from the 1 on tv.
i think they may be struggling to get callers because they arnt advertising the streams to there tv audience.
its all well and good telling the tv viewer you have 4 more options but it would be better if they were told the options were viewable and present when they turned up and use the site. they can advertise the site and its contents after 9pm but all you see is a little logo... the girls should be shouting go to sintv for live chat and streams. as they wont have to worry about atvod as long as they can successfully argue that there content is not tv like (the bbc recently did this with there online content) and R18 content isnt allowed on tv so its defiantly not TV like...
streams:
i love the idea of girls doing more on the streams but if the girls arent present they arent gonna get calls, are they?...
in reality if they want the streams to be a success then there gonna have to take the hit and put the girls on full shifts doing 1-2 hour sessions with a 15 min break for the whole night. anything less is just a pointless effort. added to that, im starting to think there getting paranoid about the amount of people watching but not calling, so are cutting sessions short to stop in there eyes "freeloading"...
if thats the case they may as well cut the web streams all together and just go with 1-2 girls per shift. as the lack of output is gonna cause the guys watching to go elsewhere and if they like what they see spend there money on the competition.
They need a schedule to show when the girls are on and what stream. and stick to it.
Drop the connection charge, put it something simple like 10p, get the girls talking to callers, build a regular fanbase.
simple.
(10-05-2015 01:40 )darren73 Wrote: [ -> ]What is the point of them having 4 xstreams when they only use 1or 2 a night can't see the point of having them at the moment no one is on them
Because when they started they were ridiculously optimistic, thinking that they could run 4 streams and it would be a success. But now reality has set in and it's started to dawn on them that running these streams is basically just a way of losing money, so they are therefore cutting their losses by not using the streams very much. They haven't given up on the streams completely, so they are obviously still hoping that they can find a way to make them work, but it looks like an uphill struggle.
If they give us phone lines that work the calls will improve
"as they wont have to worry about atvod as long as they can successfully argue that there content is not tv like (the bbc recently did this with there online content) and R18 content isnt allowed on tv so its defiantly not TV like..."
Tell that to Shebang who got reported to Ofcom by AtVOD because it was, in their opinion 'Tv Like'. The BBC has clever lawyers, and can afford them. so would often win their arguments. Babe Channels etc. can not afford these and just take the hit.
They have already tried to advertise the webstreams in a discreet way and appear thwarted on every move.
I thought it was Ofcom regulations which were the problem, not ATVOD.