The UK Babe Channels Forum

Well they certainly have the girls now, just need to get the tech right now.

(17-04-2015 23:52 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]Tonight I pretend I have stumbled across this new venture for the first time on Sky after the day-long 'launch' advertisement.

So I looked in at 9 pm and thought "That aint much of a launch"

Then at 10 pm there was another 'launch'. But not wishing to sound disrespectful, that came across like the greeting you would probably get from third-rate cat-house. Now I know that the girls are quite attractive (I have seen this before) but that, in my eyes, was not very pretty at all.

Now. I only know what I see. Where are all these other girls that are talked about on here. Since 9 pm I see just one option to phone so, if I knew no better, that is all I could get from this.

In other words, the internet thingy simply does not exist tonight for all those who just watch on Sky. But reading the above, Sky viewers are missing little since it seems that they have over-stretched themselves by trying to be just a little too clever.

Don't shoot the messenger. This is just my opinion.

don't shot the messenger, but then, maybe the messenger should just relax a bit, and give them a bit of a break?

the web side of things hasn't gone well so far, but in fairness, there is only so much prep you can do. You can test as much as possible but there's no testing for the real launch, when you can get swamped with viewers or other issues can occur without notice.

my own view is that they should use tonight and the rest of the weekend to tune the offerings now that they have measurement of the volume of demand.
Many sites and many organisations of many sizes, including some far bigger, have had worse starts despite preparation, so lets all relax a bit, and see how it develops.
its not like we are paying for it, its free so we cant moan that much, in fairness.

Just look at the fiasco that's BSX, its a farce most weeks, and that's just one channel.

lets be patient, I'm sure it will be sorted soon

im sure that will happen in time saviour123. always going to be teething problems/technical problems as sintv goes fully operational with their launch on sky. once they've got the sky launch out of the way, im sure sintv will look at what needs to be done and get things sorted.

overall I think it's been a good launch show tonight, the only disappointing thing for me is Louise Porter hasn't been on yet. hopefully she'll be on soon

but none the less a good launch show tonight

For future nights is it possible to drop the 12.45am preview section now the channel is active?

When I do get a picture, it just loops the last 10 secs again and again.

Sadly unwatchable atm.

Back to Ree? What happened to the rotation? 2 dom shows in a row shows lack of ideas

Only topless sessions tonight for the SKY channels?

I must say I'm very impressed with the picture quality on 942. It looks like HD (is it?)

The lighting is also excellent, and very flattering for the performers.

I too was very impressed with Thai's nippleodeons, you know what they say: Big Nips, Big Lips. (and I ain't talking laughing gear!)

Would appreciate an opportunity to see whether big nips do mean big lips, Sin TV, so you know what you have to do!

Labia Man

(18-04-2015 01:54 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Only topless sessions tonight for the SKY channels?

Yes I agree that is a disappointment but what they haven't done on the telly they've managed to more than do on the webshow so I can't be overally harsh on Sin TV.

It would be nice to see them lighten up a bit on the telly so if I was to judge this channel purely on its SKY output then I'd have to say it's just far far too censored.

(18-04-2015 01:52 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Back to Ree? What happened to the rotation? 2 dom shows in a row shows lack of ideas

most of the girls went home at 2am