The UK Babe Channels Forum

Any news on the website?

(08-07-2015 09:51 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Ree looks a bit silly saying nothing was wrong yet not having a job for awhile. She was having a go at us but we were right the channel was and is in trouble. All her protesting that all was well has been shown to be wrong. Another no show night show proves all is not well as they don't have the girls to do the shows. Sin mark 2 is as poor as the first attempt but I am sure at least one contributor here will not see it.

ree wasn't having a go at the forum, she was laughing at some of the comments/speculation that some forum members were posting. there is a difference.

I will agree sintv don't have a big enough roster to do the shows because of all their babes that left over the past few weeks. They do need to bring in babes asap to boost the roster to avoid situations lile last night when they had no cover available to cover a cancelled show. Signing Beth Bennett from bs is a brilliant start and they need to bring in more babes like beth

Regarding "sin mark 2" being as poor as sin mark 1. disagree because sin mark 1 for most of it's time was very good, they had a very good roster of babes who were overall doing very good shows but were being let down by a lack of organisation etc from the sintv bosses/management which eventually caused sin tv to go off air for a few days.

sin tv mark 2 isn't as good as sin mark 1 because of a lack of babes and no website, but in time it can be if they have learnt their lessons.

over to you sin, don't waste this 2nd chance

I want to see Karina on the web show giving Beth a good chugging

(08-07-2015 13:55 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Regarding "sin mark 2" being as poor as sin mark 1. disagree because sin mark 1 for most of it's time was very good

Sorry, the 3-in-a-bed shows were crap, irrespective of who the babes were.
Although I never really watched the 3-in-a-bed shows so maybe I shouldn't judge.
Or maybe not watching them is judgement in itself.......

agree soc that's one show I'd like to see on the x-stream when the website is back, Karina & Beth being very filthy with each other.

hope it does happen

thesilentmajority agree about 3 babes on one set, im not a fan either as ive already said, but overall for most of the time sin mark 1 was very good. at the moment seems it will be 1 or 2 babes on sky. hope this stays the same when sintv bring in more babes and any other babes go on the xstreams so eventually it will be 1 or 2 babes on sky with another 1 or 2 babes on x-stream

There's no apologies or explanation on their twitter for last night's lack of show. If it was a no-show, that means they only had one girl booked for the whole night, which is poor.
I think, due to their pretending nothing happened (although nothing literally did happen), it is just as likely that they decided that Tuesday nights are too quiet to waste paying anyone to come in, and deliberately had no show.
Funny that they are back to tweeting away again now that they have the day-girls on, keeping us informed.

^Never apologize, never explain

There is no way of knowing exactly what is going on at SinTV right now, ok, so they appear to have paid the girls now (or most of them), some girls have fled the nest and gone elsewhere, so now what are SinTV up to? The website, well, it's clearly offline and that message is just a cover for the fact they have not paid their provider yet, so i'm assuming they have put plans in place to sort this out, HOWEVER, with the website down, and many of us who don't have SKY using it to watch the girls and call, it MUST be hitting them in the pocket still? Ree Petra was on yesterday - no website, cannot watch her show. Wouldn't anyway (after her Twitter posts CLEARLY aimed at us on here), i stand by my stance of NOT watching/screencapping or calling Ree EVER AGAIN. Still pretty pissed off about Ree and other girls comments about forum users a while back. SinTV's silence and trying to save face by not looking inferior and given the famous tag of 'couldnt run a piss up in a brewery' just makes them look amatuer at best. This problem has been caused by over excited management overspending the budget on wages and not paying attention to the facts. Yes, you can have the biggest pool of talent on your roster, but if people are not calling, this is what happens. Bye Bye SinTV, or nearly bye bye SinTV. Is it a matter of time before they close permanently, or is it a case of they are going to rise frorm the ashes and actually be the channel they had the potential to be? What about call costs? I've heard it's much more expensive now, is that wise? Given the circumstances, probably yes, they need to make money, but that is risky, if calls are too expensive the callers go elsewhere to get their kicks. That means less money. Hmmm... this is a tough debate. SinTV could do themselves a favour by at least being honest, the silence only throws fuel on the fires of rumour. To save SinTV, they must re-structure the whole organisation, from management to models, sack the lot of the old crew and models and start again witha fresh approach. Get the basics up and running first. Sort out the finances, re-build and prep the website for a return (with more live streams, web and TV), re-build the potential SIN (Mark1) had, but this time, now they know the mistakes made, get it right!

(08-07-2015 13:55 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]ree wasn't having a go at the forum, she was laughing at some of the comments/speculation that some forum members were posting. there is a difference.

I disagree Rammy - without meaning to be rude, your opinions change like the great British weather, Ree's comment, WAS having a go, be it at the forum, or be it at the comments, it's still having a go. Our comments were about SinTV, not Ree, but, like Lilly did, she made it personal. Fans won't accept that, it is chat and discussion about SinTV, their sudden disappearance and stories of not being paid sprung into the limelight, the discussion was naturally going to go in that direction, and understandably, like myself, some fans have turned off watching her after her comments, and rightly so. I have seen your posts on Twitter to Ree and other models and as far as i'm concerned, your opinions cannot be trusted because i believe your actually being very bias towards them - basically, they can do no wrong in your eyes. I have defended you when Bronco was having a go, but i will admit, your post above certainly stinks of defending someone who had a go at people who DID NOT have a go at her when all this started.

I am very sorry for this post, i did not want to say these things, but i had to. Rammy, i am sorry if you are offended, I don't like being like this, but i needed to put my point across. Your a nice guy, I like reading your posts, i like your screencaps and pics you put up, but on this one post above that i've quoted, i just had to pull you up on it (again, i am sorry)

(08-07-2015 14:11 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-07-2015 13:55 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Regarding "sin mark 2" being as poor as sin mark 1. disagree because sin mark 1 for most of it's time was very good

Sorry, the 3-in-a-bed shows were crap, irrespective of who the babes were.
Although I never really watched the 3-in-a-bed shows so maybe I shouldn't judge.
Or maybe not watching them is judgement in itself.......

3 girls on screen is crap... period

I've said it a few times, it does not work. One camera, three girls, potentially three callers, who no doubt want the girls to interact withthe camera in some way or form, but they cannot get this because there are other girls on set too with callers who want the same thing, so the camera operator has no choce but to just give the occasional zoom in, quick peek at the girl, then zoom back out again to show all three girls. It just doesn't work. Yes, i know there are the 3-girls-on-screen fanboys who love it, but i don't. It doesn't work in my opinion. I really hate it that much. Better off having those three girls on a single set, two or three added streams to the website and let fans enjoy it more 1-2-1 on sacreen when calling. No harm in doing a 2-4-1 during the night with one of the other girls, or mix it up a bit trying to find a winning formula, but three on screen, well, everyone pretty much knows my thoguhts on it now