The UK Babe Channels Forum

(19-04-2015 21:03 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Everyone of us is a potential caller and paying customer.

I have to sort of disagree there. I'd say everyone one of us could be a caller, but if we are all truthful, most of us fall into one of two groups
group 1, are the actually callers and spend money on the channel, and therefore have more justification to praise or criticise, to offer ideas or suggestions
group 2, are the ones that will watch the web feed or sky channel but will never actually ring up themselves. they will post lots of comments, whinge or praise, and demand lots, but never actually spending their own money.

Now I'm not saying who is in which group, and anyone that wants to scream out or protest innocence, can blow themselves, because they'll probably be group 2 and wont like being called out like this.

But to my mind, group 1 should certainly comment/suggest/praise/criticise here, but only within acceptable levels.
Telling SinTV which levels to do, or whether they comply with OFCOM rules or not, is just pointless.
SinTV will produce what they produce, they will listen to sensible and rationale argument, but most likely, ignore some of the silly self opinionated comments on this forum.

its the people that spend the money, that influence the most, and the group 2, who wont actually make any difference so don't pay too much attention to them.

who is who? only each one of us will know which one we are

suggestions:
I like the slow sexy strip, maybe have a 5mins striptease 'event' once an hour, where the girl does a striptease to nude or whatever. If its known about, it might just get more watching, and then in the mood to ring up, as opposed to the same thing hour after hour, so to speak.
also:
crotchless underwear

Perhaps somebody can tell me why there is at least a 20-25 second delay between what is shown on the sky channel and the webstream equivalent.

Also It seems one of their producers used to work at Babestation because they've just had a big banner across the screen, several times now, saying 'girl caller listen-in now.'

(19-04-2015 22:52 )welshken Wrote: [ -> ]

(19-04-2015 21:03 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Everyone of us is a potential caller and paying customer.

I have to sort of disagree there. I'd say everyone one of us could be a caller, but if we are all truthful, most of us fall into one of two groups
group 1, are the actually callers and spend money on the channel, and therefore have more justification to praise or criticise, to offer ideas or suggestions
group 2, are the ones that will watch the web feed or sky channel but will never actually ring up themselves. they will post lots of comments, whinge or praise, and demand lots, but never actually spending their own money.

Now I'm not saying who is in which group, and anyone that wants to scream out or protest innocence, can blow themselves, because they'll probably be group 2 and wont like being called out like this.

But to my mind, group 1 should certainly comment/suggest/praise/criticise here, but only within acceptable levels.
Telling SinTV which levels to do, or whether they comply with OFCOM rules or not, is just pointless.
SinTV will produce what they produce, they will listen to sensible and rationale argument, but most likely, ignore some of the silly self opinionated comments on this forum.

its the people that spend the money, that influence the most, and the group 2, who wont actually make any difference so don't pay too much attention to them.

who is who? only each one of us will know which one we are

suggestions:
I like the slow sexy strip, maybe have a 5mins striptease 'event' once an hour, where the girl does a striptease to nude or whatever. If its known about, it might just get more watching, and then in the mood to ring up, as opposed to the same thing hour after hour, so to speak.
also:
crotchless underwear

If you see a girl you like and your curious about phone sex or your a regular caller of a girl you will call. Yes people like to request or moan it's a strange thing if a show is all things to all men

(19-04-2015 22:35 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]Openness to ideas and ability to venture away from the tired output of other channels is important.
A brand new channel can, with the right mentality bring out the best in babes who may not have been achieving full potential at previous channel.
Sin TV above all else has to be proactive, positive and forward thinking. Involve babes, production staff and camera operators in an ongoing process of evaluation of the visual product.
Seek ideas from all parties to make the shows of the best quality to satisfy as many people as possible and encourage the viewer of today to be the caller of tomorrow.
If the babes feel involved at more than just a be in front of the camera level I believe their enthusiasm and enjoyment is increased as well.
The culture of a channel is so important and the culture of the other channels seems defeatist and turgid at present imo.
Sin TV has a golden opportunity to buck the trend and establish itself as a genuine nightshow force.
Don't waste it.

for my two penneth, the rest of the channels have just gone shite! boring mundane, they have all but thrown the towel in.
SinTV could be the fresh breeze that the whole scene needs, so fingers crossed.
Hats off to Mellie for coming on this forum. Too often, I've seen channel reps (for want of a better expression) come onto forums, and at first there is good exchange of comment, but then the trolls and whingers just start being offensive, and the channel reps just stop bothering (understandably)
I hope Mellie will stick at it on this forum, deal with the offenders as needed (so far, looks like she knows how to and have a long and fruitful interchanging future on the forum

Every credit to you Mellie for taking so much of your time to read all this stuff.
The fact that you so obviously care is not lost on any of us and I feel sure the consensus amongst those on this thread is one of gratitude and respect for that.
So thank you.

(19-04-2015 22:52 )welshken Wrote: [ -> ]

(19-04-2015 21:03 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Everyone of us is a potential caller and paying customer.

most of us fall into one of two groups
group 1, are the actually callers and spend money on the channel, and therefore have more justification to praise or criticise, to offer ideas or suggestions
group 2, are the ones that will watch the web feed or sky channel but will never actually ring up themselves. they will post lots of comments, whinge or praise, and demand lots, but never actually spending their own money.

^I think group 1 can be sub-divided into those who ring regularly and those who ring occasionally. By far the larger group is the occasional caller. The channels aim most of their strategy meetings towards this potentially far larger source of revenue.

Oh sweetie, you haven't upset me at all. Frustrate would be a more apt word xxxx

(19-04-2015 22:33 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you Mellie for being on the board today we are lucky to have you, once again you have taken some heat sorry for upsetting you. X

(19-04-2015 22:59 )welshken Wrote: [ -> ]

(19-04-2015 22:35 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]

SinTV could be the fresh breeze that the whole scene needs
Hats off to Mellie for coming on this forum. Too often, I've seen channel reps (for want of a better expression) come onto forums, and at first there is good exchange of comment, but then the trolls and whingers just start being offensive, and the channel reps just stop bothering (understandably)
I hope Mellie will stick at it on this forum, deal with the offenders as needed (so far, looks like she knows how to and have a long and fruitful interchanging future on the forum

^I get the feeling that Mellie can hold her own.

(19-04-2015 23:08 )Mellie D Wrote: [ -> ]Oh sweetie, you haven't upset me at all. Frustrate would be a more apt word xxxx

(19-04-2015 22:33 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you Mellie for being on the board today we are lucky to have you, once again you have taken some heat sorry for upsetting you. X

Sorry I am frustrated too xxx

(19-04-2015 22:52 )gunnar Wrote: [ -> ]Perhaps somebody can tell me why there is at least a 20-25 second delay between what is shown on the sky channel and the webstream equivalent.

Also It seems one of their producers used to work at Babestation because they've just had a big banner across the screen, several times now, saying 'girl caller listen-in now.'

I do know the answer to this, but I'm busy watching an oiled up Lacey on the bed on Sky and therefore my brain has turned to mush