think you should gunnar, especially as tickets start from just £12.50
if SinTv does have a stand, please can Louise Porter be one of the sintv babes attending as well as mellie and bex. she lives in Liverpool which is only about an hour from Event City
I wonder, will the women be allowed to go nude on the basic SKY channels, or is full nudity only being kept for the web streams? I don't mean uncensored content on SKY, just full nudity like most of the channels have, or used to have
(19-04-2015 20:06 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ] (19-04-2015 19:55 )gunnar Wrote: [ -> ]
how long will it be before I get accused of being a sintv fanboy 
when you post on Tori's and Lacey's thread saying they had a good night
(19-04-2015 20:08 )Mellie D Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for your feedback Scottishbloke. However, constructive by definition would be useful and saying that the channels are poor for using OFCOM as an excuse is not useful. The fines and consequences of breaking the rules that OFCOM put in place are massive. No girl or producer wants to lose their job for breaking the rules nor do they want to be responsible for all the other members of their team to be out of a job should a fine be imposed and/or channel taken off air. The rules frustrate the girls and producers more than the viewers. I have been all three, so I can speak from actual experience
So no, your comments are not constructive. Try suggesting something that can actually be done to enhance the callers' experience.
Well I'm sorry that you never viewed my comments as constructive. Yes I understand the implications that breaking ofcom rules can have on the channel.
However Ofcom does permit nudity after 11PM but the babes on the SKY show seem to be wearing 2 pairs of panties most of the time. I used to call RLC in the past when the oiled up Lucy Summers was on and it was money well spent.
Sorry to say it but I can only have a good callers experience if there is something visual that can entice me to do so as its not cheap having also once racked up a massive phone bill before when I spoke to Bailey Cream for 45 minutes.
I am a would be caller to the show but not until such point in the future where you decide to ease off a bit on the self censorship which to me goes beyond what the actual rules suggest having already read the rules myself.
Keep up the good work on the webshows Mellie as I might give them a bell at some point in the future.
Wasn't Louise Porter naked on Sky the other night? As I said before, if you want a girl to do something that YOU find exciting, you are more likely to get it if you CALL and INTERACT with the babe
Simples
xxx
(19-04-2015 20:29 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ] (19-04-2015 20:08 )Mellie D Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for your feedback Scottishbloke. However, constructive by definition would be useful and saying that the channels are poor for using OFCOM as an excuse is not useful. The fines and consequences of breaking the rules that OFCOM put in place are massive. No girl or producer wants to lose their job for breaking the rules nor do they want to be responsible for all the other members of their team to be out of a job should a fine be imposed and/or channel taken off air. The rules frustrate the girls and producers more than the viewers. I have been all three, so I can speak from actual experience
So no, your comments are not constructive. Try suggesting something that can actually be done to enhance the callers' experience.
Well I'm sorry that you never viewed my comments as constructive. Yes I understand the implications that breaking ofcom rules can have on the channel.
However Ofcom does permit nudity after 11PM but the babes on the SKY show seem to be wearing 2 pairs of panties most of the time. I used to call RLC in the past when the oiled up Lucy Summers was on and it was money well spent.
Sorry to say it but I can only have a good callers experience if there is something visual that can entice me to do so as its not cheap having also once racked up a massive phone bill before when I spoke to Bailey Cream for 45 minutes.
I am a would be caller to the show but not until such point in the future where you decide to ease off a bit on the self censorship which to me goes beyond what the actual rules suggest having already read the rules myself.
Keep up the good work on the webshows Mellie as I might give them a bell at some point in the future.
As far as i know ofcom dont enforce a double knickers rule,which is what ive mostly seen from the women on sky.Sin is doing poor shows by ofcom standard's and theres no two ways about it!! Last time i watched storm there were two women on screen completely naked for hours....is that allowed or are they breaking rules?
The webshows and the actual babe channel are two completely different things,the webshows might be good i wouldnt know,but the sin sky channel is most certainly not.
Hope it improves
(19-04-2015 20:08 )Mellie D Wrote: [ -> ]Try suggesting something that can actually be done to enhance the callers' experience.
Lower call charges and get rid of the connection fee completely.
(19-04-2015 20:36 )Mellie D Wrote: [ -> ]Wasn't Louise Porter naked on Sky the other night?
Eh..........I don't know how to say this but not really, she showed a wee bit of bum but when I mean naked I mean proper naked, like Lori and Lucy do on BS for example. I need more than that to entice me to pick up the phone, you have a shower set why don't you bring that out to play on the SKY show. Bluebird did
(19-04-2015 19:43 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]...I just feel that the we can't push things too much reason has been used as a rather convenient scapegoat. I address this issue to all the channels and not just Sin TV 
Although I've agreed with all of what welshken has had to say on this thread today, I think SB also has a point with the above.
Some channels and girls have used the Ofcom defence to suit them in self-censoring their shows beyond what is strictly necessary for the regulations - as it, presumably, suits the content levels they are prepared to work to. Ofcom has been a convenient excuse for some babes I don't think there is any denying that.
Only, as yet, I have to see any real justification or evidence for levelling this claim at Sin's night shows. IMO, Sin TV's feed would be foolish to lower their general content levels to the depths to which some of it's rivals have sunk in recent months. They have potentially lucrative web-streams to promote. Why would a viewer of their TV channels think that their web streams would be worth paying for if they did not at least
hint at the goodies to be seen there. Whilst they have the average Joe's attention with their TV shows they need to aim for more than one drunken phone call.
Sin must know they have to be that little bit above the rest on TV if they are to convince the masses they mean business online.
Everyone of us is a potential caller and paying customer.