Hate the 3 girls on screen at once
Actually 2 girls onscreen at once is pretty rubbish too!!
Think I've made my point clear!!
You won't enjoy the Beth ' Aruba Jasmine & Tina Kay video then.
I'm sure I'll put up with it!! Ha ha! 3 girls onscreen at once "interacting" (you know what I mean!! Lol) I love!!! 3 girls cramped onto a set designed for 1 pretending they're the only ones there and desperately shaking their phones I dislike intensely.
(26-06-2015 00:07 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ] (25-06-2015 22:38 )ILoveBrunettes Wrote: [ -> ]...What if you are on a call to one of the girls, your watching, and the camera zooms to another girl? Hell, that would piss me right off.... Each time i watched the three girls on screen when i was watching Ree Petra, the camera operator really did not know where to go with the camera. I know it's popular with many the three on one screen, but for me, i hate it...
Good post but I have to pull you up on 3-in-1s being "popular"?! Really? With whom? I've not seen them anything but slated on here really. I can't imagine anyone (casual viewer or fan) who's not a channel operator finding any reason to favour them really! Tolerate, yes, I can see that; if you thought 'your' girl (of the night or favourite) might not be on screen otherwise or something. But is that popular?
Anyhow, sorry to quibble but they are a little bugbear of mine too...
The current multi girl sessions are (IMO rightly) derided - mostly for the exact reason you enumerate. They don't allow the caller/viewer to focus on the object of their affection. No-one can really fantasise about three babes consecutively in this format! (At least not unless they are writhing in an orgasmic mass! :-D Hardly likely under the current rules.) A guy's focus is always going to favour one girl and be disappointed by the inevitable distractions from that focus as you say.
(The pole has been used by Sin girls in the past btw. It is practical. At least, it was.)
to be honest, i was trying to be a bit polite with that - when i said that there are many that enjoy the three girls on screen - it really is offputting for all the reasons i mentioned. No need to apologise about the quibble, seems we are on the same page about the 3-girls-on-screen set up. It's horrible, i hate it.
Sin TV needs to make money and having 2+ girls on together will make more money than having just one.
For a while I've been seeing posts on here about how the channel will be gone by the end of the year (mainly because they're bitter about Sin having more than one babe) but the awful Xpanded TV has lasted around 3 years and they often have 2/3 babes per night.
(26-06-2015 12:59 )trax Wrote: [ -> ]Sin TV needs to make money and having 2+ girls on together will make more money than having just one.
For a while I've been seeing posts on here about how the channel will be gone by the end of the year (mainly because they're bitter about Sin having more than one babe) but the awful Xpanded TV has lasted around 3 years and they often have 2/3 babes per night.
SinTV would make more money by adding more streams to their website, it's as simple as that. Yes, there may be costs involved in doing that, but with time, these costs will pay for themselves. The present set up of one channel on TV and the same channel on their web stream does not work. The web stream they have is never on, when it is, they shut it off after a short while and it's ages before it's back on. They do the same with the streams. IF they had more streams, it wouldn't be so bad. They could cut down the 3 girls on screen and use the 2-4-1 offers to entice callers. So lets say they have 4 babes on one night, using the live TV stream and the web stream, they have no choice but to have three girls on screen and one on the web stream. They may rotate it, but it doesn't work if your only tuning in to watch and call your favourite babe. When calling your fave babe when it's 3 girls on screen, it's awful, because there are the possibility of two other callers, the camera operator can do nothing. So, if you want close-ups, your out of luck, because your then pissing off the other two potential callers who also want to see their fave babe get close up and fun with the camera. That's why 3 girls on screen does not work. No, the simple solution is the addition of the web streams. Most other channels who have websites have more than just the two streams. SinTV are a young production, they have a lot to learn, this is the first step. By keeping it as it is, callers will only be around for a short while, take the girl yo uwant to watch and call off screen like that currently do, people turn off, or they go elsewhere. More streams = more choice for viewers which means more chance of making more money. Am i thinking too far ahead? No, i don't think so. The sets they have seem decent enough, maybe just a small improvement here and there, but they seem fine. It's the website and the streams that they need to look at. That is where to start.
^ That's fine in theory and obviously what Sin thought before launch and is basically what they tried to do.
Unfortunately they couldn't persuade enough people to find them online. What they were/are offering on there was/is not different enough to their TV output and they are hampered by not being able to advertise the streams directly on the TV. (I see they now advertise their twitter on mic on TV.)
So yes more swapping of the girls might help. (Most seemingly now fear going on the xstreams due to the lack of calls.) More perserverence and stronger content certainly would but that requires the right babes. Their voyeur cam was instigated in a totally counter-productive fashion and completely put people off. A strictly limited but hard and fast published rota would now look to be the best way forward for the xstreams and yes with as much babe interaction as they can muster! (Have all the current babes forgetten or foresworn this art!) But such a longterm plan seems to be beyond their management.
Basically, Plan A failed and they have floundered to find an effienct alternative online. A bigger and more renowned operation on TV may be another answer. From there they could start again online.
Any revovery just seems such a long way off atm for Sin that it's hard to see.
People have short memories.
The current call is to have more web-streams. But they already tried that and it failed. And it failed due to lack of information that they existed. Even now with one extra stream that lack still exists or the channel simply lacks the will or confidence (a bit of both I suspect) to make it work.
It could be made to work if they followed the current 'unleashed' model whereby the caller takes the on-screen girl off for a little more fun. But many of their girls would not go to that level.
As for Xpanded, I suspect their longevity is down to constant cheap-rate calls so they make their money by volume. Sin have flirted with cheaper calls before the sat launch yet have not done anything like that since.
Will they survive as they currently are ? Who really knows. They have been on the tv for nearly two months now so have had to weather the storm of low (possibly lower than they anticipated) income returns. But they would not have received that low income during that period anyway. It is only now that the telecoms company will be paying them for those months. So, effectively, they have another two months live on that previously earned income. If in this period call volumes do not reach expectations, their future prospects do not look good.
Good post here shady, agree with you here. Plan a has failed and so far they haven't got a plan b. they need to come up with one soon otherwise the end of SinTV will be sooner rather than later
