The UK Babe Channels Forum

(03-07-2015 13:48 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-07-2015 13:37 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]the way i have heard it the going off air was a result of sin restructuring the wages they pay

What's that Biblical reference about "The wages of sin.."
It nearly did lead to their death as a channel.

It still might because that sort of history does not look good to girls who might consider going there. If they really have enticed girls to leave existing jobs with promises of more money and then reneged on that then I for one would be delighted if they closed immediately. It would be different if they used agreed contract notice periods to reduce rates at a future date but to try and reduce it for work already done is despicable.

All this sounds to me as though their business plan was way off track and they had some very twitchy bankers. Bankers don't relax in these circumstances very quickly so at the first sign of further trouble I'd expect more problems. Its all very well thinking that you can reduce costs and increase prices and all will be rosy but they have pissed off their key resource and their customers at the same time. They may have been able to keep some girls but it does make you wonder if they thought their prospects elsewhere were minimal and I've commented before that latest recruits are not exactly premier league.

All very sad

The management might have taken advantage here in the knowledge that many of the girls who do this sort of work are not the sharpest tools in the box.

The recent 'quiz a model' at the start of a bs program:-

Q. What is the capital of Spain ? A. Just a vacant stare from the girl
Q. Pedicure or facial ? A. (Need you guess ?)

But if this 'back-dating' has happened, a clause in a contract can be challenged by a smart lawyer. The girls just need to get together and pool their resources. If such legal action brought the channel down it is no more than they deserve.

(03-07-2015 13:43 )HEX!T Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-07-2015 12:17 )derekdas Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-07-2015 00:26 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]what complete rubbish youre saying here Justin-Dabath. I don't spend all or 90% my time on here at all. for a start I have a care worker who comes to see me 3-4 mornings a week and we do various things including walking my dog. I also regularly attend an autism centre and do various activites with them including day trips out to various places, art group, holdays and pub nights. also I spend a lot of time helping my dad out in general. also I'm a huge ice hockey fan and that takes up a lot of my time throught the year, especially between September and April when the season is on. even more so this season as Manchester Phoenix will be playing their home games in Deeside (north wales) this upcoming season as we build a new permanent home in Manchester city centre. so with all this going on, I don't crave at all a rt or reply from babes, that's up to whoever im tweeting

don't have a go at me like this unless you know me as a person which you don't

All this on benefits no doubt.

actually pal thats fucking low. rammy has issues day to day that you and i dont have to deal with. so if he has to live off state benefits or gets some extra help with living expenses then so be it.
dont come here with your ideological bullshit having a go at the more vulnerable members of our society. just because there offered a little extra from the state.
i may not agree with rammys postings but having a go at him because he's differently able is actually fucking sad and says more about you than him...

Thanks hexit and everyone who thanked hexit's post very much appreciated. That's all I'm going to say in response on that

Agree with winsaw, it's not fair on the girls what sin are doing especially that sin want to backdate the cut to shifts the sin babes did that they haven't been paid yet for, they should get those shifts at the wage sin said they would pay them when they joined sintv

Maybe they will now settle as a channel and be more realistic in their aims and we may get some fresh new faces in the near future as they have hinted at.

If they had been more realistic in their ambitions and pay scale right from the start, then they probably wouldn't be in the mess they're in now.

(03-07-2015 14:28 )Danzig Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe they will now settle as a channel and be more realistic in their aims and we may get some fresh new faces in the near future as they have hinted at.

I'm hoping this as well Danzig. Lets see how sin do from now on

Is the Sin-TV HD stream not playing for anyone else with VLC?

hd 1 stream has been off for a while mate. i guess because its the highest demand they decided to use the sd stream as the main feed to save bandwidth and reduce server side stutter.
seems to have worked. it went off about a week after they time they started streaming to rampant. i have posted and updated link in the live stream thread. just follow my sig.

(01-07-2015 20:54 )dave34 Wrote: [ -> ]going by digital UK'S website you should from today get sintv in your channel lineup. On freeview but I can't see this happen now that the channel has close

Only recently noticed this post, anyway iv'e done a bit of checking and Sin TV does have a Digital Terrestrial TV Licence, but it is not a regular freeview TV licence, it's a licence for broadcasting on TV via the internet, info here http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/radiolice...7sintv.htm

The company that holds the Sin TV DTAS freeview licence is different to the company that holds the Sin TV Sky/Satellite TV licence .

Quote:I'm not saying Rammy doesn't deserve some of the flak he gets, but you've been here 2 days. You don't look at all like some cunt jumping on a bandwagon........

PML well said

I know Rammy has made quite a number of controversial posts, and a few have taken exception, but really, is it the end of the world, no.
so some on the forum disagree, that's good, it sparks debate. a bit of banter is good.
And no, I'm not taking one side or the other, I'll just say, everyone lighten up a bit.
and as for Justin, I think the silent majority called it pretty well

and as for SinTV, I don't really bother myself so this is just one idea. but maybe the girls weren't bringing in enough to cover their own wages, and SIN decided to just get rid of them, shut down and properly sort out the tech side, relaunch in stages, keep a couple on new terms, and then get some more girls in on better terms.
Personally, I didn't see anything special about the girls that have left, so maybe we'll get some better selections now? If SINTV keeps going.

also, as for the sardine syndrome. theres a few sites/channels that have more than 3 girls in the same room, so it can work well, if done well.
keep multiple girls in the same room for the TV, after all, they cant do much else, and the webfeed would be ideal for single girls in rooms, getting up to the good stuff

but hey, what will be , will be, relax, don't bust a blood vessel, we're talking about fantasy, not reality. chill a bit