(26-06-2012 13:58 )GTIMKV Wrote: [ -> ] (26-06-2012 01:03 )hairbald Wrote: [ -> ]Well Priya just set an all time high for the "I don't want to be on BSX". Showed nothing (and considering her shows previously this is just weird) and was clearly not enjoying the experience.
Why do babestation keep doing this? I didn't expect Lori to show anything but Priya should have been different. I give up
Didn't watch last nights (no) show, but that kind of thing has happened before with both twins. I've asked Preeti about this and.....
...well it's probably more to do with Geri, Lori and what they are prepared to do when they make their "guest" appearances on Xtreme. And BS "management" of course. Not sure what BS stands for here!
Kinda reminds me of when I started working for a certain retailer in IT support and within a week was told to reduce my level of work because a majority of colleagues couldn't measure up and customers were beginning to question why there was such a difference...
I think it's all about "managing expectations". Can't see how it makes any sense if the actual product or service delivered is actually worse.
Surely it's better to bring everyone else up to a higher standard...
Spot on mate, I totally agree with you on the whole working standard. I too had a similar experience when I was working with the NHS IT Network team when I was informed to stop getting too involve with these service providers because they would always ask for me and when I'm not around they clients would expect the same level of service from my colleagues which might backfire on the team.
I don't blame Priya, Preeti or any of the other girls who have stopped being explicit on BSX, I mean if the likes of Lori, Geri and Tiffany aren't showing fuck all and are getting paid the same money or even higher for being tame on BSX then I'm sure the twins don't want to be the mugs who show all when the rest aren't.
(26-06-2012 13:58 )GTIMKV Wrote: [ -> ]Didn't watch last nights (no) show, but that kind of thing has happened before with both twins. I've asked Preeti about this and.....
...well it's probably more to do with Geri, Lori and what they are prepared to do when they make their "guest" appearances on Xtreme. And BS "management" of course. Not sure what BS stands for here!
In other words it is fuck all to do with ofcom's 'rules', they are simply a convenient cloak for babestation to hide their very dodgy sales and marketing practices behind and certain girls are in on it.
How is it a 'mystery' show when they post on the bsx twitter feed that Lacey is going to be on tonite!!!!
They must be struggling if their highlight is 3 new Killergram pieces of drivel......lots of shots of men's bottoms, the ceiling, the cheese plant in the corner etc but no sex. Producers take note we want hard lesbian and solo action from the models who appear on your channels, not some unknowns with blokes on 'roids...a Babe is a woman in case you hadn't worked it out.
Well said, solo girls are the way forward, or at least girl/girl. Whats the point in showing boy/girl when you only see as much as you can on a late night movie for free? Pointless...
(03-07-2012 00:31 )kappa110 Wrote: [ -> ]How is it a 'mystery' show when they post on the bsx twitter feed that Lacey is going to be on tonite!!!!
I don't know, but I subscribed to the show last night for one sole reason that I knew that Lacey was on. I wouldn't have paid to see a mystery show.
I loved her show with Chantelle Fox,any news when she will be on again
Why is Tuesday's night show exactly the same as tonights (Wednesday)?
I hope that Babestation can keep up with posting the Xtreme schedules. It's slipped off the radar a few days recently, but now that they are doing these extended Naked Babestation shows the channel has got more credibility these days, so they do need to keep us informed of the schedules, as nowadays we actually have a good reason to see what's going to be on the channel on any given day.
Am I mistaken, but have they stopped promoting Xtreme on Sky before
11.30 the last few nights? Maybe they realised they were alienating more viewers/potential callers than they were attracting subscribers.