m100 Wrote:Have a trip to your local R18 dvd licensed sex shop and have a look for michelle in Harmony's 'Ladies who lust' or 'young harlots foreign exchange' - you'll not feel ripped off then and they won't cost much more than a couple of nights of extreme.
Yep I'm aware that you can see most of the girls in porn movies, the point of ordering BSX for me was because I wanted to see 2 of my faves get it on, on TV, on Babestation (being a regular viewer I've come to know them all), and also something about a so-to-speak 'live show' made it more appealing.
I also wanted to see various scenes featuring other faves , eg Leah Jaye.
Hence Michelle having an orgasm 'live' with Amanda not quite the same as watching one of her dvd's.
I had read negative comments on this thread re: taming down, but I still wanted to see for myself - mostly for my own curiosity since I could compare it to my last BSX experience which wasn't really that long ago, and which I had enjoyed very much as it had been v. explicit.
I didn't mean to come down hard on BS-- just voicing my disappointment is all.
"Ladies who lust" = Michelle + Lolly (+ omar).
I know what you mean about wanting to see them in a slightly less manufactured environment than that of a porn set but, as I've said before, I think we have to come to terms with the fact that all we're going to get is the 'watered down' version of extreme. Maybe it's easier for me and the watcher to let it go as we experienced the loss of party girls. The on the edge of hardcore version of extreme was great while it lasted and it may make a comeback when common sense is finally applied to adult tv viewing in Britain just as it had to happen for porn movies.
Interestingly channel four showed a tit as part of an ad for a us drama called the big c at around 5.15 this afternoon.
As from 1st march all online/website ads will also be monitored by the advertising standards authority so if you're promising hardcore as part of your ad you'd best be delivering.
(24-01-2011 19:01 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ]"Ladies who lust" = Michelle + Lolly (+ omar).
I know what you mean about wanting to see them in a slightly less manufactured environment than that of a porn set but, as I've said before, I think we have to come to terms with the fact that all we're going to get is the 'watered down' version of extreme. Maybe it's easier for me and the watcher to let it go as we experienced the loss of party girls. The on the edge of hardcore version of extreme was great while it lasted and it may make a comeback when common sense is finally applied to adult tv viewing in Britain just as it had to happen for porn movies.
Coming to terms with it right now as we speak
Will just keep fingers crossed for a hardcore comeback.
Anyway, I will prob end up getting that movie you recommend since it also features the inimitable pinnacle of perfection that is Lolly Badcock.
Thanx for the tip.
I still haven't had the chance to watch any of this, and I don't reckon I will either. I would only be remotely interested in explicit shows featuring Karlie Simon, and even then I'd think twice before paying it. These so called "explicit hard" shows aren't exactly living up to the descriptions judging by all accounts in this thread.
(24-01-2011 21:27 )paprika2010 Wrote: [ -> ] (24-01-2011 19:01 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ]"Ladies who lust" = Michelle + Lolly (+ omar).
I know what you mean about wanting to see them in a slightly less manufactured environment than that of a porn set but, as I've said before, I think we have to come to terms with the fact that all we're going to get is the 'watered down' version of extreme. Maybe it's easier for me and the watcher to let it go as we experienced the loss of party girls. The on the edge of hardcore version of extreme was great while it lasted and it may make a comeback when common sense is finally applied to adult tv viewing in Britain just as it had to happen for porn movies.
Coming to terms with it right now as we speak
Will just keep fingers crossed for a hardcore comeback.
Anyway, I will prob end up getting that movie you recommend since it also features the inimitable pinnacle of perfection that is Lolly Badcock.
Thanx for the tip.
Michelle's scene with cate harrington in cunning stunts is worth a look - it's a long scene but it does take a while to get going. I'd avoid her scene with michelle thorne in wicked ones as they have very little contact with one another and resort to solo dildo stuff for the most part.
Always found:
http://www.pulseandcocktails.co.uk
to be relatively cheap although they don't have shops throughout the country so it depends how near.
Regenerated - you'd have enjoyed her scenes with dani and with michelle but her live show with angel long was strangely poor. May have been an early victim of a crackdown. Nowadays, I wouldn't suggest you go near it.
Is the 'live' show actually pre-recorded? Reede and Ree were shown being filmed for bsxtreme at 11pm on freeview 96 on Saturday night. Someone must have pressed the wrong button in the studio, unfortunately noticed after a few seconds and went back to normal show.
(24-01-2011 22:40 )deltic Wrote: [ -> ]Is the 'live' show actually pre-recorded?
It didn't used to be - there were quite a few occasions when dildo penetration could clearly be seen - yes Angel Long you know i'm talking about your shows. I think it probably is now as they are terrified that anything approaching sexual contact might be shown.
(24-01-2011 22:52 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ] (24-01-2011 22:40 )deltic Wrote: [ -> ]Is the 'live' show actually pre-recorded?
It didn't used to be - there were quite a few occasions when dildo penetration could clearly be seen - yes Angel Long you know i'm talking about your shows. I think it probably is now as they are terrified that anything approaching sexual contact might be shown.
Megan was saying on BS last night that the out-takes (not seen before) from a recent "live" show had now been reviewed and after approval would be shown later that night.
The original show could have been live, but maybe they had an extra camera taking a different view to what was transmitted at the time, and this is what they meant by out-takes.
(25-01-2011 11:44 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ] (24-01-2011 22:52 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ] (24-01-2011 22:40 )deltic Wrote: [ -> ]Is the 'live' show actually pre-recorded?
It didn't used to be - there were quite a few occasions when dildo penetration could clearly be seen - yes Angel Long you know i'm talking about your shows. I think it probably is now as they are terrified that anything approaching sexual contact might be shown.
Megan was saying on BS last night that the out-takes (not seen before) from a recent "live" show had now been reviewed and after approval would be shown later that night.
The original show could have been live, but maybe they had an extra camera taking a different view to what was transmitted at the time, and this is what they meant by out-takes.
The things we advertise as 'live shows' on the weekend are fully live, not pre-recorded. I'm not sure what the level of content now is as I don't see it, but they may be filming them differently to show less if they need to.
We do sometimes have films we refer to as 'pre-live show' stuff, where the girls get together before they go live and film a scene, and this is pre-recorded.
I think The Watcher is probably right about the outtakes scene, probably just pre-recorded, unseen footage from a live show. But I don't know for sure.