The UK Babe Channels Forum

:Dbs extreme is a waste of money and too expensive.it is the recession after all.rubbish camera work.me thinks it is much better watching sexstation tv instead of this rubbish

Bad camera work, not just bad angles, superbly inconvienient postioning of on-screen numbers, softer than softcore porn film shorts, not to mention dodgy lighting.
All adds up to a low quality / poor quality product (it doesn't need to be) when compared to the free sky channels which don't pretend to be anything other than the tit and arse shows that they are.

I agree Xtreme is utter rubbish.

From what i heard about Michelle's g/g show it was also crap. You get to see more of the girls body when they do solo shows cause the g/g shows have really bad camera work.

Even though Michell's g/g show was boring she thought she was doing a vid for Guess the reason i'm saying that is because she still had her damn clothes on ...

Whatever camera was used for the two Naked Babestation shows last night has either a smudge on the lens, or has burn-in.
There's a circular blob which looks more like a burn-in from a light or something of that nature.
Picture below (within crudely drawn outline) shows the thing I'm mumbling on about... (and no, this is not a mark on Leah's bum)

For those waiting for me to post caps from the last few nights, I'm likely to disappoint.
As they seem unwilling to hear that the OSGs for the telephone number on the Naked Babestation shows needs to be reduced, I seem to be unwilling to post caps.

They ignore the point around OSG on this channel and we all know how awful they are on their other channels. So it's time to take a stand and boycott them.

Yeah, it's probably extremely childish of me but the caps are effectively advertising the product and I'm less inclined to do that given they're not listening to their customers...

(20-03-2011 15:50 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]it's probably extremely childish of me but the caps are effectively advertising the product and I'm less inclined to do that given they're not listening to their customers...

It's not childish after all it's £5 to watch the channel / webstream then it's an extra £1.53 a min for those that call the girls. It's because of the bloody graphics i wont buy another webstream code. The same goes for channels 906, 909 & 910 i don't call them because of their stupid & unwanted graphics...

(20-03-2011 15:50 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, it's probably extremely childish of me but the caps are effectively advertising the product and I'm less inclined to do that given they're not listening to their customers...

It's not too much to ask with the prices they charge to have a clear screen to view what has been paid for - good for you for standing up for your principles

(20-03-2011 15:50 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, it's probably extremely childish of me but the caps are effectively advertising the product and I'm less inclined to do that given they're not listening to their customers...

Totally agree with you. I'm sure the number of caps posted on the forum, not just for this broadcaster but all broadcasters has generated more income for them than they could ever wish for....
What is posted tends to show the best from the shows and is just a snippet of the overall show so to ignore comments from paying customers on possible improvements seems a backward step.
Broadcasters should not underestimate the power of a good cap. As the saying goes, 'A picture is worth a thousand words'.

I wonder if you could fix up another free trial via webstream in the next days. i wanna discover this channel first.