(10-07-2010 15:17 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2010 09:18 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]I think if you look through the various early pages of this thread a number of us have suggested this is the way to go. But BS thought lets not do this and put something on that we don't want!!!
although everyone would love for that to happen, we need to have enough girls willing to do it in that format. the live shows we are doing currently are mostly running as a test to find out the interest from the girls etc, and see if it is feasible for us to do.
you wouldn't want us changing it to live and then having the same 2-3 girls on it as they are the only ones willing to do it.
remember the girls have restrictions themselves, as we've said many times before you simply won't get paige doing much more than she already does on BS, sure some of the girls will but there has to be enough of them which will before we can look at a fully live show
Many Thanks for replying to my post. I do understand what you are saying, but I think if you managed to get a few of our favourites to do this (girls like Carmilla, who I am sure would be ok with it), then you could allways top off the roster with models/pornstars. There are literally thousands of girls who work in the industry, and I am sure you have more contacts than most.
After all you are giving apsiring actresses/models the opurtunity to be on television...
I also think you will be surprised at what the majority of us want. Not everyone expects it to be Full on Hardcore Porn, most people here know the regulations you are tied to, and really the most we expect is open legged shots of the girls. As I said before , if we want Hardcore Porn we can get it Free on the Internet.
Anyway, thanks for taking it seriously, and I hope that maybe a move in that direction may be on the cards..... fingers crossed!
(10-07-2010 15:57 )Rogerbee Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, there we have the trouble. If you try it, you'll get accused of wheeling out the same old faces, they can't go as far as a video would allow and you'd never be off OFCOM's radar. The only feasible way would be as a live webcast as there aren't many restrictions, but that's Sexstation anyway.
All one can do is carry on regardless I suppose.
To be honest we all know that OFCOM cant be crossed. I think we realize that the best we can get is what is within their guidelines. As far as I am aware, as long as Babestation extreme use the pay/encryption method, I believe open legged shots and non penetration girl/girl is perfectly legal and acceptable. If they worked within these guildlines I think both OFCOM and us the punters would be happy.
I do understand that for some people this would not be enough, but sadly til the laws and guidelines are challenged, this is a good compromise. All just my opinion obviously
I think that is why harder live content is a bit risky, you get Lolly in the right mood and all bets are off! It's that side to her that has made her so popular though, it's that element of never knowing what you're going to get that really makes a night. It's a pity it's also what gives OFCOM sleepless nights!
Is the Channel worth watching?
Mmmm, depends,
If you like Lolly Badcock, then yes. Other stuff is variable to say the least. Ree and Camilla are good though.
If you want to see the Glamour models eg , Paige, Ella, Stevie and others do not bother they will never do more than what they do know.
If you want to see Camilla, Dani, Lolly, Ree, Michelle, and other porn stars then yes its worth watching.
But best thing is to watch ch96 freeview from 11pm or ch906 before midnight when they let you know who is on and what you will see. Eg if your a Camilla fan and they say she is on then it would be worth it. If you just pay and hope she is on then she may be disappointed if she not on that night.
(10-07-2010 20:20 )malyen777 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2010 15:57 )Rogerbee Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, there we have the trouble. If you try it, you'll get accused of wheeling out the same old faces, they can't go as far as a video would allow and you'd never be off OFCOM's radar. The only feasible way would be as a live webcast as there aren't many restrictions, but that's Sexstation anyway.
All one can do is carry on regardless I suppose.
To be honest we all know that OFCOM cant be crossed. I think we realize that the best we can get is what is within their guidelines. As far as I am aware, as long as Babestation extreme use the pay/encryption method, I believe open legged shots and non penetration girl/girl is perfectly legal and acceptable. If they worked within these guildlines I think both OFCOM and us the punters would be happy.
I do understand that for some people this would not be enough, but sadly til the laws and guidelines are challenged, this is a good compromise. All just my opinion obviously
maylen77, if any of the channels wanted to challenge Ofcom in court they could and, they'd probably win, because Ofcom have no evidence whatsoever to back up their claims to be protecting anyone with their blanket bans and fucked-up contradictory arguments for and against PIN protection.
(10-07-2010 16:01 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]if we want soft porn there is no way you can compete with The Adult Channel and TVX in terms of price and quality
How do you know this? What is the evidence?
(11-07-2010 16:20 )IanG Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2010 20:20 )malyen777 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2010 15:57 )Rogerbee Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, there we have the trouble. If you try it, you'll get accused of wheeling out the same old faces, they can't go as far as a video would allow and you'd never be off OFCOM's radar. The only feasible way would be as a live webcast as there aren't many restrictions, but that's Sexstation anyway.
All one can do is carry on regardless I suppose.
To be honest we all know that OFCOM cant be crossed. I think we realize that the best we can get is what is within their guidelines. As far as I am aware, as long as Babestation extreme use the pay/encryption method, I believe open legged shots and non penetration girl/girl is perfectly legal and acceptable. If they worked within these guildlines I think both OFCOM and us the punters would be happy.
I do understand that for some people this would not be enough, but sadly til the laws and guidelines are challenged, this is a good compromise. All just my opinion obviously
maylen77, if any of the channels wanted to challenge Ofcom in court they could and, they'd probably win, because Ofcom have no evidence whatsoever to back up their claims to be protecting anyone with their blanket bans and fucked-up contradictory arguments for and against PIN protection.
I totally agree with you 100%. I just wish some of the companys would grow some balls and challenge Ofcom.... No arguements from me... My statement was made sadly under the assumption that no one will have the guts to do it... God I so hope I am wrong...
(11-07-2010 21:24 )aldershot1993 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2010 16:01 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]if we want soft porn there is no way you can compete with The Adult Channel and TVX in terms of price and quality
How do you know this? What is the evidence?
It's elementary!They do more of it with the girls we generally want to watch
on more channels for longer at a fraction of the cost!approx a tenner a month as
opposed to a fiver a night!not sure what more evidence you may need