(08-07-2010 21:39 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]Could be interesting. The general content could do with being beefed up. However, you still need a babestation emphasis.
never fear, we are still trying our hardest to get as much new babestation content as possible. the new content will be to replace the old skool scenes, something more relevant i hope
What I would really like to see, and I think I speak for lots of others on these forums is the following.
A show very similar to "Babestation", but with full nudity and the girls sometimes playing with each other. I dont mean sets, or movies, but just an interactive 5 hour show on the couch so to speak.....
Just like the Babesation, people could phone in and the girls swap over every half hour or so with the normal channel. Obviously you just would get to see the girls fully nude and occasionally getting a bit saucier.
With the internet, Porn is not an issue.... the reason people would pay the £5 is to see the girls they love from Babestaion going that bit further.
Also it would make sense from a production point of view. No having to make or buy in movies. Just run the camera's exactly like the normal Babestation Channel but nude... Apart from paying the girls slightly more money for showing their bits, the cost to the company would be nothing extra.
Also they would gain more revenue from extra phone calls the proper nude chats would generate...
To be honest I often sit for hours watching the normal Babestaion shows, as I like your girls. If I could watch Camilla, Tiff etc, but with them actually showing more than just their boobs and bums, I would happily pay £5 every night. I dont think I am alone in this....
I am glad to see the owners of Babestation, posting here and speaking to the fans.. and hopefully drawing from the feedback provided. I bet you if tomorrow night they dropped the Randy Spears movies and soft Porn , and just let channel 96 run as normal but with the girls being allowed to open their legs, people would be paying their £5's by the bucket load.
The silly thing is, that everything is set up and ready to go. I am sure the girls that are willing to go full nude, would like the extra money each night, and the set is already made and ready to go. The £5 charge acts as an adult verification, that removes the strict "no pussy" rule that applys to the free babestation channel. Everyone wins.
Also if you get new girls appear on Babestation, you can tempt viewers by saying pay £5 tonight and get to see "x new girl" but fully nude... And the girls could just move between the channels as they do already.
Remember ... due to the harsh UK restrictions, you cant really do Porn... but your girls are special...your main asset, and people will pay to see more of them cause they like them.... If we want Porn we surf the net...
(08-07-2010 22:55 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ] (08-07-2010 21:39 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]Could be interesting. The general content could do with being beefed up. However, you still need a babestation emphasis.
never fear, we are still trying our hardest to get as much new babestation content as possible. the new content will be to replace the old skool scenes, something more relevant i hope
Rather than spending time and money getting new content, most Babestation fans (I include myself), would rather you do the following:
Leave channel 96 broadcasting Babestation, but call it Babestation Extreme, scramble it as normal, unlockable with the £5 charge, but remeove the restriction put on the girls. Let the show run but let the girls show full frontal nudity, and maybe some girl/girl between them.
Your fans love your girls and would like to see more of them live in the studio. We dont want movies or planned sets... keep it live and interative and let the "Babestation Girls" we love really entertain us.....
Save you a lot of money and we would all be happy!
(10-07-2010 09:09 )malyen777 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-07-2010 22:55 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ] (08-07-2010 21:39 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]Could be interesting. The general content could do with being beefed up. However, you still need a babestation emphasis.
never fear, we are still trying our hardest to get as much new babestation content as possible. the new content will be to replace the old skool scenes, something more relevant i hope
Rather than spending time and money getting new content, most Babestation fans (I include myself), would rather you do the following:
Leave channel 96 broadcasting Babestation, but call it Babestation Extreme, scramble it as normal, unlockable with the £5 charge, but remeove the restriction put on the girls. Let the show run but let the girls show full frontal nudity, and maybe some girl/girl between them.
Your fans love your girls and would like to see more of them live in the studio. We dont want movies or planned sets... keep it live and interative and let the "Babestation Girls" we love really entertain us.....
Save you a lot of money and we would all be happy!
I think if you look through the various early pages of this thread a number of us have suggested this is the way to go. But BS thought lets not do this and put something on that we don't want!!!
Yeah, I know, Xtreme turned me against Lolly and I've only just begun appreciating her for the star turn she really is. I will ignore Xtreme in future, but not her.
(10-07-2010 09:18 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]I think if you look through the various early pages of this thread a number of us have suggested this is the way to go. But BS thought lets not do this and put something on that we don't want!!!
although everyone would love for that to happen, we need to have enough girls willing to do it in that format. the live shows we are doing currently are mostly running as a test to find out the interest from the girls etc, and see if it is feasible for us to do.
you wouldn't want us changing it to live and then having the same 2-3 girls on it as they are the only ones willing to do it.
remember the girls have restrictions themselves, as we've said many times before you simply won't get paige doing much more than she already does on BS, sure some of the girls will but there has to be enough of them which will before we can look at a fully live show
Yeah, there we have the trouble. If you try it, you'll get accused of wheeling out the same old faces, they can't go as far as a video would allow and you'd never be off OFCOM's radar. The only feasible way would be as a live webcast as there aren't many restrictions, but that's Sexstation anyway.
All one can do is carry on regardless I suppose.
(10-07-2010 15:17 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2010 09:18 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]I think if you look through the various early pages of this thread a number of us have suggested this is the way to go. But BS thought lets not do this and put something on that we don't want!!!
although everyone would love for that to happen, we need to have enough girls willing to do it in that format. the live shows we are doing currently are mostly running as a test to find out the interest from the girls etc, and see if it is feasible for us to do.
you wouldn't want us changing it to live and then having the same 2-3 girls on it as they are the only ones willing to do it.
remember the girls have restrictions themselves, as we've said many times before you simply won't get paige doing much more than she already does on BS, sure some of the girls will but there has to be enough of them which will before we can look at a fully live show
Then in simple language you do not have a viable business model. if we want soft porn there is no way you can compete with The Adult Channel and TVX in terms of price and quality and I cannot believe with all of the porn stars out there you cannot develop a roster of girls to deliver the type of product that we actually looking for. Given if Paige and others wont do it then find someone that will. Its all a question of ambition and cash. if you are happy to take our £5 to give us sub standard product then at least be willing to invest it the other way to give people what they really want from babestation. Which on its free channels is a really solid and consistent performer unlike some recently discovered channels!!
You will probably think i'm a complete arse for asking this, but why is full frontal nudity, please see that I said full frontal, not open legged posses, allowed on BS or any of the other stations. It does seem strange that shows are being broadcast on terrestial channels are ok and are shown well before the show starts on FV. Like others I bet you watch Trueblood, others are probably watching Spartacus, is the content of these any different in explicitness at the time of broadcast to what is being shown on BS, I think not. So come on lets see if things somehow might change, alas I allready know the answer to my own question.