The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(17-04-2010 23:12 )skateguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(17-04-2010 22:34 )escobar Wrote: [ -> ]from the time my pin didnt work i aint paying for this

It was suggested that the problem arouse because you were trying to use a pin from a previous evening - was this not the case?

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid490747

no this was not the case i tried to use the pin on the same night i texted for it
(18-04-2010 03:26 )escobar Wrote: [ -> ]no this was not the case i tried to use the pin on the same night i texted for it

So what happened when you entered the PIN?
(18-04-2010 01:27 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]It's stronger action from the non-porn BS girls I would want and that's clearly not going to be forthcoming.

Of course not.
(18-04-2010 01:56 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]The mention of Paige is the only thing that interests me. Wait, is that Paige Tyler?
It was Paige Tyler, and it was a short (1mn 35s) start of what I suppose/hope is a full strip. It's all very soft focus, and Paige is far more sexy and entertaining on the live BS shows.
However, we got just about as far as "bra off" time, and then they ended the night - this is the most we got to see...

[Image: babestationxtreme-20100418-paige-strip-sample.jpg]

Let's hope they actually show this properly on the "repeats" tonight
(17-04-2010 18:21 )Sooky Wrote: [ -> ]
(17-04-2010 14:56 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]Yes you are the only one.

Thanks for answering on behalf of everyone on the forum - now I know
Wink

Madam, one does not attain the rank of admiral if one is afraid to express oneself in a forthright manner.
(18-04-2010 09:24 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]
(18-04-2010 03:26 )escobar Wrote: [ -> ]no this was not the case i tried to use the pin on the same night i texted for it

So what happened when you entered the PIN?

His TV exploded. Or perhaps the screen simply went black as some others have reported.
How soft is that focus !! they must of put at least 2 tubs of Poundland vaseline on the lens to get that effect Wink
(18-04-2010 13:09 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]
(17-04-2010 18:21 )Sooky Wrote: [ -> ]
(17-04-2010 14:56 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ]Yes you are the only one.

Thanks for answering on behalf of everyone on the forum - now I know
Wink

Madam, one does not attain the rank of admiral if one is afraid to express oneself in a forthright manner.

Ah, but just because someone assumes a position of responsibility beyond their ability does not make them right - as BS has proved.
I too, see the danger here - the thin end of the wedge - possible outcomes are endless but could include ALL BS channels on freeview going encrypted or the non encrypted channels being severely watered down either in content or format (remember the tiny screen in the corner of the text page they had for a few months: well imagine that with a 'to see full screen pay £10')
I don't think likely to happen soon as BS revenue must come primarily from the £1.50 per min calls at the moment - but if the encrypted channel is successful then who knows...

I do however, make a request to mods - please can we close down some of these threads - there are now at least 7 for Xtreme (and its not even been on a week yet!):
whats on (at last), screenshots, review, 'nice' criticism, 'negative' criticism, on sky, on virgin - and there aren't even any girls on it yet!
Surely Whats on, Review & Technical would be sufficient?

I don't want to deny anyone the opportunity to express themselves, but I think that since BS became so paranoid that he started throwing insults and refusing to read anything that looked negative, these threads have become devisive and are likley to descend to a slanging match.

We have what we needed most (the belated whats on tonight - albeit in minimal terms) so now we can make an at least partly informed choice. So if people want to pay thats up to them. And those who choose not to can keep an eye on the whats on to see if / when they want to take the service.

Its up to BS now (the company not their representative here): let the numbers do the talking!
(18-04-2010 12:49 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]
(18-04-2010 01:56 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]The mention of Paige is the only thing that interests me. Wait, is that Paige Tyler?
It was Paige Tyler, and it was a short (1mn 35s) start of what I suppose/hope is a full strip. It's all very soft focus, and Paige is far more sexy and entertaining on the live BS shows.
However, we got just about as far as "bra off" time, and then they ended the night - this is the most we got to see...


Let's hope they actually show this properly on the "repeats" tonight

That looks like the vid that was posted on http://www.party-people.tv/videos on Thursday ...1mn.35 sec on there to

It has NOT been posted on Paige's site .... ( YET )
(18-04-2010 12:49 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]
(18-04-2010 01:56 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]The mention of Paige is the only thing that interests me. Wait, is that Paige Tyler?
It was Paige Tyler, and it was a short (1mn 35s) start of what I suppose/hope is a full strip. It's all very soft focus, and Paige is far more sexy and entertaining on the live BS shows.
However, we got just about as far as "bra off" time, and then they ended the night - this is the most we got to see...

[Image: babestationxtreme-20100418-paige-strip-sample.jpg]

Let's hope they actually show this properly on the "repeats" tonight

it was posted on the party people website the other day so culd be a few paige stripones nice one where she ends up naked on a chair
Reference URL's