(01-05-2010 14:23 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]If it is the end or they are downgrading it serves them right the money they wasted. they completely screwed this up.The launch
was too long the product eventually was not good enough and they committed suicide only offering it to freeview considering the large web and sky community out there.
All we wanted was an unrestricted version of what we have now, I think people would have been happy to pay maybe a £5 per month to join some sort of vip club which would allow the girls to go as far as they do on the call services you get on Television X and The adult Channel for example. especially when we know the likes of Dani, Michelle,Lolly would participate in this and maybe more.
How to take a simple concept which most people would have been up for and completely fuck it!!! Well done BS
I agree completely. We wanted an unrestricted version of what we have, which means all or most of the women from Babestation being present. I'm glad Camilla made the effort to go fully nude, which was refreshing to see, but others like Paige, Lori and Stevie, didn't show anymore than they do on the regular channel, and they are always pushing the envelope. Why not show it all on Xtreme? Didn't make sense to me.
I'd love it if we could see the women go from the regular channels, to Xtreme, all in one night. Revolving from channel to channel, like they do now, but including Xtreme, so we can see them live.
Also, we don't want to see guys!
It should have the same background as the regular channels do, and should include 2-4-1's, and solo shows, all full frontal, if the person desires.
Why is this so difficult?
Obviously they've been trying to trick new viewers into watching old material, which is lame, especially since the new material is mediocre anyway.
Once again, props to Camilla for at least giving us a bit of what we all wanted in the first place! Props to Stevie, Paige and Lori as well for even appearing, despite not going Xtreme.
(01-05-2010 10:06 )Josh187 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-05-2010 02:01 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Does Lori go full frontal, or is it another lame censored show? Seeing the actual photographer doesn't help either, not to mention the soft focus.
I think this channel is dead in the water!
I'm looking forward to what Blue TV has to offer.
Lori doesn't go full frontal, do you honestly think she would?
Yes this channel does seem to be dead, judging by how active these Babestation Xtreme threads are thesedays. With this Babestation guy not here to tell us what's on tonight's show, i think people have lost total interest.
I did actually think she would go full frontal, since she appeared on Babestation XTREME, and not regular Babestation. Why go on at all if you aren't going to go full frontal? It's called XTREME!!!!!
I've said already that Camilla stands out amongst the others because she did actually go fully nude!
(01-05-2010 18:24 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]I am also not arguing the format cannot be successful on Freeview just not Freeview alone. Satelite and Freeview pentration account for about 70% of all Digital penetration excluding,cable, BT etc so if you neglect fundamentally half your target market it is suicide!!!
You're contradicting yourself. You state that more homes have Freeview than Sky and then say that channels on Freeview alone can't be successful, even though there are plenty of successful channels broadcast on Sky alone. Read what you said again as it makes no sense. If Sky channels can be successful by being in 32% of homes, why can't Freeview channels be sucessful when you admit they are in more homes than Sky?
(01-05-2010 19:20 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ] (01-05-2010 18:24 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]I am also not arguing the format cannot be successful on Freeview just not Freeview alone. Satelite and Freeview pentration account for about 70% of all Digital penetration excluding,cable, BT etc so if you neglect fundamentally half your target market it is suicide!!!
You're contradicting yourself. You state that more homes have Freeview than Sky and then say that channels on Freeview alone can't be successful, even though there are plenty of successful channels broadcast on Sky alone. Read what you said again as it makes no sense. If Sky channels can be successful by being in 32% of homes, why can't Freeview channels be sucessful when you admit they are in more homes than Sky?
I am not contradicting myself at all. The point I am repeatedly trying to emphasise is that none of these services can make it via one channel to service. yes there are more Freeview boxes in homes but for these services niche services in particular such as this it has to be available on all platforms.
What services on Sky can you tell me are successful on just sky alone as you say? Even sky accept their viewing figures receive an important boost from cable and BT Vision and Sky Anytime.
The point remains BS Extreme is failing because of poor price points and poor exposure and ultimately not the best product.
Before Extreme launched did not the station say that it was for a trial period only, and that it would survive if viewers responded in a positive fashion, it does'nt take a genius to see what the answer to this is.
just because they have stopped posting on here does not mean that they are shelving the channel
may just be, that we on the forum are not giving the channel the warmest of reception!!
(01-05-2010 18:31 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]I did actually think she would go full frontal, since she appeared on Babestation XTREME, and not regular Babestation. Why go on at all if you aren't going to go full frontal? It's called XTREME!!!!!
I've said already that Camilla stands out amongst the others because she did actually go fully nude!
With most of the Babestation girls, you're not going to see more than you would do on Babestation. Don't let the 'Xtreme' title fool you, all you see is sofcore porn and tame strips from the Babestation girls.
Camilla is on of the few girls that goes fully nude on Babestation Xtreme the others would be Lolly, Michelle, Dani O'neal and possibly Ree as they have done porn in the past. Girls like Lori, Paige, Georgie etc will never go further for Babestation Xtreme, so don't get you're hopes up that they will.
They certainly are not scraping the channel, as they continue to advertise it multiple times every night (which is very annoying)
I just think the channel is dying, most people don't seem to care for this channel anymore, we don't get any recent updates, the Babestation Xtreme threads don't generate much interest on the forum anymore, compared to what they used too.
The majority of the people on this forum, have simply given up on this channel.
I can only comment from my own experience, which is that the channel does have some interesting moments, and indeed that is true on most nights. There are problems sure - such as the USA soft porn movies which I'm completely not interested in watching and doubt many others are as well.
With such a large back catalogue of content from Sex Station I've hugely surprised by the amount of repetition of some scenes.
The "sneak peaks" of coming soon attractions in terms of content from Georgie, Tiffany, and Camilla do whet the appetite, although I'm getting annoyed at the waiting.
The channel is tamer than say Redhot/TVX/Adult Channel, but is clearly harder than BS1 etc as all the content is pre-recorded and edited together, so they don't have to be constantly vigilant for slips etc.
For me, the channel doesn't fully deliver, and my evening viewing tends to go to other channels. That said, I am still posting caps a few times a week if things are of interest...
(01-05-2010 20:11 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]not the best product.
sweetsugar007 is obviously a master of the understatement!