The UK Babe Channels Forum

(17-04-2010 11:01 )Rogerbee Wrote: [ -> ]It's still £5 VIP right now, but, when it does go up to £10 do they think that everyone that has been paying that will love it enough by then to want to pay more? I hope they get the answer they want, I really do. I also find it interesting that when Michelle mentions her porn, she says to type her into a search engine, it's like she knows we can find better stuff than she does for Xtreme.

She does, and so do the vast majority of viewers.
But I don't really see the money as the problem - £5 or £10, guys wills pay for it if they think its worth it, and that depends on who's on and what they're allowed to do (ok the false advertising is wrong but I assume they've given themselves a bedding in period and once the show format is settled will probably increase the price, so they've put the £10 on to save later complaints about hiking the price - trouble is I have to assume it because BS won't tell us).
I don't even think hardcore or explicit come into it that much - I'd pay for Morgans website stuff if they were to show it or maybe even a 3 hour repeat of a classic partypeople show if it had cara, morgan, cherri, hannah emma etc.
The problem is that we don't know.
They expect us to pay when we don't know whats on, not because we do - thats just wrong.
You wouldn't buy anything else under those circumstances so why is a babeshow any different?
Infact in any other situation it would be considered a scam and the same judgement should apply here.
What is the problem with honesty and informed choice? EVERY other pay for view channel does it so why are BS so special?
I reckon they're pretty close to the edge here: misleading advertsing & trade description - they may find this taken out of their hands if trading standards were to look in this direction.

Good points well made. If the content continues to be like it was on launch night then interest will dwindle once everyone's curiosity has been satisfied. I already have a better collection of GG porn that is more explicit than any we're likely to get here. Is BS Xtreme a possible replacement for Sexstation? Same girls doing the same things isn't it!?

(17-04-2010 10:18 )misterG Wrote: [ -> ]He's been part of this post since 28/2 and has been aware of all the conjecture from the start. As the self appointed representative of Babestation he could at any time have quashed the incorrect assumptions and told us what was going to be provided - but instead he's allowed the conjecture to grow into expectation unchecked - and that at very least makes him culpable. Allowing someone to believe a lie when you know its not true, is the same as telling it.

You can hardly expect channels to come on here and comment on every bit of speculation and conjecture going. If they did they would only have to miss one item and you'd claim that they had confirmed it by not quashing it. The simple fact is that as soon as they were ready they started a thread and told everyone what was going on. If you chose to imagine other things in the meantime that was your own choice, so in future simply make sure you learn your lesson and don't believe anything until you get an official announcement.

Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?

Think about it - if this channel was to take off and they were to make loads of money off of it, then surely other channels would follow suit and do likewise (but obviously with their own slant on it to make it appear like they haven't just nicked the format )

Now - if they are making money out of an encrypted subscription based channel......what incentive would they have to continue with free to air channels? They are, afterall, merely money making businesses - not public service channels

I thought it wa going back to old sexstation way of a normal show to start with and when it goes encripted, full nude pussys showing and full on pussy eating, i only watched the first night and there was no pussy eating or anthing like that apart from when i saw Rio play/rub Tammy's pussey which was good but with all the hype i was expecting a lot more, some proper g/g at least and maybe some hardcore b/g. has ther been any of that?

(17-04-2010 13:21 )Sooky Wrote: [ -> ]Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?

Think about it - if this channel was to take off and they were to make loads of money off of it, then surely other channels would follow suit and do likewise (but obviously with their own slant on it to make it appear like they haven't just nicked the format )

Now - if they are making money out of an encrypted subscription based channel......what incentive would they have to continue with free to air channels? They are, afterall, merely money making businesses - not public service channels

Ideas are cheap and execution is everything... Most people can come up with ideas, but no idea works without good planning, direction and the right marketing strategy.

The best TV networks don't ask the public to provide these things... They just invest in the right people with talent to do the job.

"Too many Chiefs and not enough Indians" springs to mind...

Does any1 else feel sorry for the people that watch normal Babestation, praying for the babes to slip out of their underwear when it's all on show on another channel?

(17-04-2010 14:07 )asti316 Wrote: [ -> ]Does any1 else feel sorry for the people that watch normal Babestation, praying for the babes to slip out of their underwear when it's all on show on another channel?

a little bit, but the quality of the babestation xtreme porn is so tame.

and this channel i think will fail, am not being edgy or conterversial. i geniunely believe that unless they add more of the glamour bs girls to it. people will see it for what it is.

babestation.tv on your television sets.

and babestation.tv also has picture sets. and works out a lot cheaper then paying a 5 spot a night to watch bs xtreme

(17-04-2010 13:21 )Sooky Wrote: [ -> ]Am I the only one who actually sees the benefit to the average punter if this channel was to fail?

Now - if they are making money out of an encrypted subscription based channel......what incentive would they have to continue with free to air channels? They are, afterall, merely money making businesses - not public service channels

Yes you are the only one.

The incentive to continue with free to air channels comes from the fact that there are always plenty of casual callers who ring into these shows and you can only capture that market by being free to air. Casual callers who flick through the channels once a month are not going to pay to see anything, as they are probably not going to watch for very long anyway.

When Ofcom wanted all the babe channels to encrypt all their broadcasts what did they do? They hired lawyers to fight Ofcom and make every effort to stay free to air - what does that tell you?

Any channel that withdrew their free to air channels would simply be handing the business to one of their rivals.

(17-04-2010 01:10 )Sooky Wrote: [ -> ]So if it only costs £5 per night as is now being said, why does the official website have a crossed out £10 and state that £5 is the introductory offer - therefore not a permanant price?

Otherwise it is false advertisement to make it appear people are getting a reduced price when it is infact the standard price

Otherwise, peoples points about it costing £10 are correct

I didn't say the £5 was permanent, again just people speculating and others believing everything they read on here, apart from if it comes from me.. but what do i know hey