Does Lori go full frontal, or is it another lame censored show? Seeing the actual photographer doesn't help either, not to mention the soft focus.
I think this channel is dead in the water!
I'm looking forward to what Blue TV has to offer.
(01-05-2010 02:01 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Does Lori go full frontal, or is it another lame censored show? Seeing the actual photographer doesn't help either, not to mention the soft focus.
I think this channel is dead in the water!
I'm looking forward to what Blue TV has to offer.
Lori doesn't go full frontal, do you honestly think she would?
Yes this channel does seem to be dead, judging by how active these Babestation Xtreme threads are thesedays. With this Babestation guy not here to tell us what's on tonight's show, i think people have lost total interest.
(01-05-2010 10:06 )Josh187 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-05-2010 02:01 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Does Lori go full frontal, or is it another lame censored show? Seeing the actual photographer doesn't help either, not to mention the soft focus.
I think this channel is dead in the water!
I'm looking forward to what Blue TV has to offer.
Lori doesn't go full frontal, do you honestly think she would?
Yes this channel does seem to be dead, judging by how active these Babestation Xtreme threads are thesedays. With this Babestation guy not here to tell us what's on tonight's show, i think people have lost total interest.
And also the constant plugging of the chaanel on both BS1 and BS2 must mean somethings not right! It really interrupts the shows and is really annoying!
There are no updates anymore, no schedules, nothing at all, even with this being a bank holiday weekend. You would have thought a guide to the next 3 nights viewing would have been a good idea, or 4 nights including yesterday, but nothing has been forthcoming. This makes me think that no more effort is being expended on this channel and it's demise is imminent, probably as soon as they can decide what to replace it with. I'm sure this is the end of the line. I thought it might be an idea to have a goobye to Babestation Xtreme thread, where people can post their 'tributes' or their goodbyes or their explanation of why the channel failed.
If it is the end or they are downgrading it serves them right the money they wasted. they completely screwed this up.The launch
was too long the product eventually was not good enough and they committed suicide only offering it to freeview considering the large web and sky community out there.
All we wanted was an unrestricted version of what we have now, I think people would have been happy to pay maybe a £5 per month to join some sort of vip club which would allow the girls to go as far as they do on the call services you get on Television X and The adult Channel for example. especially when we know the likes of Dani, Michelle,Lolly would participate in this and maybe more.
How to take a simple concept which most people would have been up for and completely fuck it!!! Well done BS
(01-05-2010 14:23 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]If it is the end or they are downgrading it serves them right the money they wasted. they completely screwed this up.The launch
was too long the product eventually was not good enough and they committed suicide only offering it to freeview considering the large web and sky community out there.
All we wanted was an unrestricted version of what we have now, I think people would have been happy to pay maybe a £5 per month to join some sort of vip club which would allow the girls to go as far as they do on the call services you get on Television X and The adult Channel for example. especially when we know the likes of Dani, Michelle,Lolly would participate in this and maybe more.
How to take a simple concept which most people would have been up for and completely fuck it!!! Well done BS
Yes I think £5 a month would be reasonable for that sort of content BUT £5 a NIGHT for what appears to be mainly fairly old films and soft-focus seems very expensive;in short I'm not surprised that its not working for them!
Hi guys
If it is the end of BSXtreme I think it will prove they have made an expensive mistake!! Instead of releasing a channel which would only be available to a section of the entire BS audience and doesn't show anything (apparently) that isn't available on any of the other tv porn channels the producers should have spent their money on nurturing new talent and securing the services of their best girls (Lori, Jodie, Cleo et al) for the indefinite future!! Instead they have lost money and some of their best and most popular girls!!
Hope this serves as a lesson - DON'T MESS WITH A SUCCESSFUL FORMULA!!
they were never gonna do that good a buisness with £5 a night for very softcore films and soft focus stuff.
and they were showing repeats apparantly after the 3rd night,
(01-05-2010 14:23 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]they committed suicide only offering it to freeview considering the large web and sky community out there.
I think this comment is certainly incorrect. There are plenty of successful channels on Sky and yet only 1 in 3 homes has Sky. Freeview on the other hand is in 77% of homes, so they had a plenty big enough audience if they had a good product. You're arguing that a freeview channel can't succeed but that must be nonsense, otherwise Sky channels wouldn't be able to succed either and yet look how many channels there are on Sky.
(01-05-2010 16:19 )elgar1uk Wrote: [ -> ] (01-05-2010 14:23 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: [ -> ]they committed suicide only offering it to freeview considering the large web and sky community out there.
I think this comment is certainly incorrect. There are plenty of successful channels on Sky and yet only 1 in 3 homes has Sky. Freeview on the other hand is in 77% of homes, so they had a plenty big enough audience if they had a good product. You're arguing that a freeview channel can't succeed but that must be nonsense, otherwise Sky channels wouldn't be able to succed either and yet look how many channels there are on Sky.
I appreciate the comment however if you want to debate fact then the DTG ( Digital Televesion group) and ofcom reports that there is an 87% digital primary penetration. That is fundamentally all digital formats including freeview with about 37% to Freeview and 32% to Sky. I am also not arguing the format cannot be successful on Freeview just not Freeview alone. Satelite and Freeview pentration account for about 70% of all Digital penetration excluding,cable, BT etc so if you neglect fundamentally half your target market it is suicide!!!
I suspect that the entry to service was less expensive on Freeview hence this approach. If loads of people had paid a fiver a night then it was a great gamble. Only problem is we aint that stupid!!!